• @girltwink
    link
    1221 year ago

    This is obviously a “social media manager” generating “engagement”. And look at that, it works.

    • TWeaK
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      And what’s the bet that most of the accounts they blocked were their own alts?

  • @db2
    link
    611 year ago

    Fake, but it made me laugh. Sadly for Jersey Mike’s their advertisement, however amusing, won’t help as there isn’t one anywhere near. Or far. Possibly really far and I’m not going that far.

    • @Just_Not_Funny
      link
      161 year ago

      You’re not missing anything. They’re the worst of the sandwich chains, IMO.

      • @Fridgeratr
        link
        171 year ago

        Subway exists and takes that spot no contest

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          91 year ago

          Quality is about the same if we’re being honest, but I can feed two people at subway for the price of one at Jersey Mike’s

          • @frunch
            link
            41 year ago

            I’m not a huge fan of either place but Jersey Mike’s crushes Subway. There’s no comparison!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Are those east coast places or something? I’ve never seen either one.

            My hierarchy is Potbelly > Jersey Mike’s > Subway. There’s also Jimmy John’s, but I haven’t been to one for a long time because I was boycotting them, but I’ll have to give them a try since I found out the company changed owners.

            Oh and Quiznos might still be good, but they have so few locations I thought they didn’t exist anymore.

      • @Astroturfed
        link
        61 year ago

        I mean, subway fucking exists and the bar is so low at the other ones I’m not sure if put them near the bottom. Look for a local option and check that out is always the better option for food.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        One thing I will give them is the one time I went to one the produce was very fresh. Points for that. The bread sucked and the meat was spare.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        I like their Phillies, but that was where Phillies weren’t that common. The mall had Phillies too, and honestly I think I liked em better, but Jersey Mike’s was faster to get to.

        • skulblaka
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          Jersey Mike’s consistently has good Phillies in places that don’t know how to make a good Philly. I’m also personally a fan of the club sandwich mike’s way. But that’s about it. Everything else I can take it or leave it.

          Those Phillies though, they keep me coming back to JM’s in new places.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        This is an insane take. Like fuck corporations and fuck this kind of insidious marketing, but JM’s is easily the very top of the chain-based sandwich restaurants

  • @_number8_
    link
    611 year ago

    can we have a lemmy wide rule to not post corporate banter

      • @ThatWeirdGuy1001
        link
        71 year ago

        Because it’s how we ended up with Elongated Muskrat thinking he’s an untouchable meme lord.

        I agree it’s funny but just like when brands first started doing this it felt like it was a bad idea

    • Joe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      181 year ago

      You can’t have a Lemmy wide rule for anything because that’s not how federation works.

  • @ziggurism
    link
    14
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t get it. Are those toppings controversial? What even are they? Pickles?

    • Clay_pidgin
      link
      fedilink
      331 year ago

      Top as opposed to bottom (receiver of penetrative sex), sub as opposed to Dom(inant).

      • UnfortunateShort
        link
        131 year ago

        And then there is this weird in-between that is the power bottom - the top of the bottoms.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          A common misconception! Bottoming is not synonymous with passivity, only with receiving. One can be a dominant bottom, or indeed a “power bottom” who is the one actively providing most of the energy.

          (No I am not going to quote IASIP)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          It’s weird to me that people find this concept weird or difficult to understand. It’s so not.

          Even seen straight porn where the woman is the more active participant, more fucking the man herself than being fucked by him? It’s literally just that, but both partners are the same sex (usually; technically you could call the woman in my example a power bottom too, but nobody does).