• tanteregenbogen@piefed.eurocomsocial.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 minutes ago

    If it is a ban on all religious symbols for state employees who are teachers, I am fine with that. To call it xenophobic is not a very convincing argument as there are Swiss people who are muslims and for many muslims a hijab isn’t a fundamental part of the religion. Making exceptions for muslims just is unfair treatment for everyone else. A secular state means citizens have freedom of religion and that religion has no place in state business.

  • jenesaisquoi@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 minutes ago

    The headline is not correct.

    All religious symbols are banned for teachers. This is because the schools are supposed to be neutral when it comes to the question of faith. The teachers can believe in anything they want, and practice any religion in any way they want - but in their professional role, they must not favour any faith, be it explicitly or otherwise.

  • nocteb@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    How about we stop talking about how people look like and solve real problems instead.

  • kossa@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    So headscarfs for male teachers are A-OK?

    What about headscarfs as a fashion statement instead of something religious?

    • davepleasebehave
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 minutes ago

      I suppose a turban would also be banned under this legislation. or is it just for women?

  • reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Are they worried elementary schoolers will convert religions due to their elementary school teacher’s religion?

    • freeman@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      14 hours ago

      its about the teachers being state (or rather canton) employees and the state and school is supposed to be free from religion. you wont see a cross on the wall either. thats the reasoning as far as I know

      • CAVOKOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        While i don’t agree with the hijab or other religious coverings because I see it as a way to oppress women, it’s equally dumb to forbid women to wear it. A school should be non religious, but that doesn’t mean that you have to eradicate all signs of religion from school grounds, just that the teaching can’t be based on it.

        This seems more xenophobic than well thought through.

        • freeman@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 hours ago

          necklaces with a cross probably are banned too, the question is, if it gets enforced

        • Elchi@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          11 hours ago

          For it being xenophobic other similar clothes would have to be allowed. Are there Teachers dressed as Nuns, Monks or Cardinals?

          • jenesaisquoi@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 hour ago

            No, they are not. Wearing a cross isn’t allowed either. The ban is for all religious symbols, no matter the faith.

          • CAVOKOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Anatole France: ‘The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.’

              • CAVOKOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 minutes ago

                It’s applicable because while the law might impact the occasional nun, I suspect that what they’re really out to do is target Muslim women.