Tim Sweeney claims it’s a “Scarlet Letter” which makes players “try to kill the game”

Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney has criticised rival Valve for forcing studios to disclose when they use AI in game development.

Epic recently showed how it was integrating AI into Unreal Engine 6.

Tim Sweeney said:

“If you want to launch a game, and get it as widely publicized as possible, you’ve got to put it on Steam so people can wish list it, and if you want to play it on Steam, then you have to get this Scarlet Letter of AI attached to your product, and now there is a hater community trying to kill the game.

“I think it’s really irresponsible of Valve. They shouldn’t do it, because it makes it much, much, much harder for a game developer to have a chance of success. You have to choose from either not using tools that can make you way more productive, and probably failing due to competition that does.”

Which is totally ignoring the factor that the user should know about the purchase it makes and be able to decide for themselves. Transparency for the player is not a bad

  • TheAgeOfSuperboredom@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 days ago

    Another example that Valve is in a dominant position not through exploitation but the fact that they run a business people actually want to interact with, and the competition keep shooting their own legs off.

  • hoshikarakitaridia
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Let’s get back to that Scarlet letter though.

    If you think AI is awesome, what’s the issue with disclosing it? Is because you’re scared people will disagree with your ethical choices?

    Such a self own. It should be anyone’s interest to disclose if something has AI in it or nah, no matter whether you like or dislike AI.

    • BJW@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      The problem with discussing it is they paint a target on their back for the misinformed mob to target with their irrational hatred.

      Think about it - if it were really that bad, you should know AI was used without needing disclosure. The fact that you do shows AI-use is a total non-issue, but it’s the latest target for the hate-filled mob. Admitting you’ve used AI is like wearing a pro-Palestine shirt to a Trump rally.

  • 0li0li
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    If “consumers” wanted AI slop, they would buy your game. Labelling it is not the problem, it’s the fact that they can’t hide it to screw over disserning buyers.

    The label on steam thst states that the game needs an online connection does not seem to bother that many people, Tim.

    • BJW@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      If it were actual slop you would be able to tell without the disclosure. It’s the fact that you can’t that shows how ridiculous this manufactured controversy is.

  • Drazakil@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    If it is the future of game development to use AI, and it is so fantastic for productivity and so on, then why is it a problem to label it on the store page?

    Gabe and Steam lives rent free in this mans head.

  • bigbangdangler@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    What did they do before AI existed? Boy, it must have been really hard back then to make games.

    Of course, they were all better somehow… Curious.

  • Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    You have to choose from either not using tools that can make you way more productive, and probably failing due to competition that does.

    Which is it? AI kills games or makes them beat the competition? What an insane level of doublespeak.

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      and probably failing due to competition that does.

      If the competition also has to disclose AI usage, then they’ll be equally disadvantaged by their own AI labels.

      No – they’re worried about competition that doesn’t use AI.

    • From_D4rkness
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Exactly what I thought when I read that line. How can anyone believe such deluded logic? Does he know that this couldn’t make sense when he says it?