Smart glasses equipped with cameras, microphones, and AI are a creeping privacy and security nightmare, prompting backlash.

And rightfully so.

  • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    Well, yeah. You wouldn’t allow someone to film at a swimming pool with their phone. Stealth cameras of any form are immediately far more suspicious.

      • some_kind_of_guy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah, and won’t someone think about those poor contractors over at Meta? How else are they going to meet their AI circlejerk quota and rank all of that increasingly disturbing novel content if they can’t watch it through their glasses on their train rides to and from the office? Let’s have some compassion here folks!

        //end bit

        Ugh, just typing that made me nauseous

  • laurenceOfSuburbia
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 days ago

    Oh - I love this angle!!!

    Spread the word bros! I’ll only call them pervert glasses from now on

  • sen@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’d wear them if they didn’t have a camera - the idea of a little screen and the music/phone call capabilities baked into something I have to wear every waking moment anyways actually sounds really nice. I’d probably turn off the display after the novelty wore off, but the audio alone is still worth it to me.

        • HubertManne@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 days ago

          microphone has many more basic uses. taking notes. voice command. I mean we all realize all the smartphones have both of these things right. I mean that is why I don’t really like them but I would more like AR although realistically not in a corp is controlling everything way. If it was open source and local and under my control that would be super cool.

        • WoodScientist
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Eh. It’s already pretty easy to conceal a microphone. Harder to conceal a camera.

          • AA5B
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Actually something I worry about …… my glasses have tiny embedded magnets for “click-on” sunglasses. Maybe they could be mistaken for tiny cameras on pervert glasses

          • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            It’s actually pretty easy to conceal. there’s plenty of investigative reporting with hidden cameras and nobody’s none the wiser. The fact that they have to add a light to the glasses proves that even if you hide it in plain sight, people will still miss it.

    • Snapz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Then why don’t you buy the Bose ones?

        • Snapz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Don’t think you read last line of their original message?

      • sen@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Bose needs to spend more on advertising, I’m the correct audience but I had no idea they made these.

        • Snapz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Tell me if you need my info for finder’s fee?

  • fubarx
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    With Google glasses, it was this strange contraption over one eye, so it was easy to shun or shame them into taking it off when at a conference or in a public bathroom (saw it happen many times).

    Problem with these are that the wearer can claim they’re prescription, even though there’s a camera and mic on them. And there are tons of stickers and covers you can buy online to hide the little recording indicator.

    There were also stories that these would soon autorecord/stream everything, and use AI to transcribe what was said and identify anyone encountered. Presumably so you could later go back and review something that you missed.

    What we have are essentially millions of portable Flock cameras with infinite storage and personal ID built in.

  • nexguy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    Down with camera glasses!

    Now back to regularly scheduled perv camera phone existence.

  • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Don’t call them that!

    Slandering the innocent perverts of the world by association with Facebook isn’t gonna make 'em quit marketin spookware to assholes who oughta know better. =U

  • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    I remember a long time ago I did buy camera glasses in 2016 and they were 720p (allegedly) but were 100% disconnected and you needed a cable to get your stuff out of there.

    Why did I get them? Because they were a good way of being a tourist and recording things from your POV without a camera. Also I bought many for a spy themed evented I was attending.

    These are just terrifying.

  • Rooskie91@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    You either get bought by Google as a start up, or live long enough to see yourself make all of Google’s mistakes.

  • Sam_Bass
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    same way the monkeywrench got its name maybe

  • Hueristic_Autistic
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    You know what there should be a pull-down menu option on all phones called, “Radius” and it puts up a censored image over you like a box or a blur that can not be removed by any smart glasses wearer but can be removed by LEO’s if needed. It could use the compasses proximity sensor and identify smart glasses in the area. Could be a nice addition to Android or Graphene.

    • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      That’s impossible. The information is already gathered, you could just be sending a beacon out saying “please don’t process this”.

      What’s to stop them from ignoring that?

    • nexguy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Better yet the glasses should just blur any human or replace them with an avatar.