• akwd169@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    No thats just a photo of dog shit, hot, steamy green liquid dog shit spraying out of a dogs asshole

      • Seppo@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Is this one of those “believe someone because of their gender regardless of the evidence” arguments? That kind of thinking is dangerous and sexist.

      • dillekant@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It’s interesting there’s a sharp line between what women and men believe here. Sadly, not knowing the details makes the propaganda more likely to work. Heard and her lawyer were stupid, but that doesn’t change what likely actually happened:

        • The dog shit the bed, because of course it did it had a problem with bowel control. The fact that Depp’s team have managed to convince people of this ridiculous idea shows just how effective propaganda can be.
        • Heard was raped and abused
        • You would have to believe that Heard lied to her own therapist for months to manufacture this. Occam’s razor, no, it happened.

        The reason people don’t like Heard is:

        • She seems shifty

        That’s it.

        Here’s a video talking about it. To anyone still on Depp’s side: Maybe don’t support abusers? Maybe don’t support their narratives if you think everyone’s a scumbag? Where are the Depp memes?

        • Sailor Anarres@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Or you know we can not pass around the myth of “mutual abuse” with no evidence just because Heard is kind of a shitty person in general and doesnt respond “correctly”.

      • CaliforniaSober@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Help me understand… did the judgement reflect that? Was Depp imprisoned or fined for being “the villian”?

        Was Amber victorious after all those legal procedures and Depp found guilty of anything?

        Did Amber have to pay anything, was she vindicated as a victim and thus rewarded?

        • proudblond
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          12 hours ago

          This assumes the legal system is infallible.

          • CaliforniaSober@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            Infallible isn’t even on the table. You’re saying theres something fallible with a COMPLETE LACK OF LOGIC OR EVIDENCE.

            No one agrees with you, you have no standing… That has nothing to do with the “fallibility” of anything… if anything you’re the one pretending to be infallible as you pretend to be correct while offering zero reason, justification or defense.

            • proudblond
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 hours ago

              I’m a bit confused — are you talking to me, or about Amber Heard? Feeling pretty attacked, which, if that was your goal, congratulations I guess?

              For what it’s worth, I honestly did not follow the case very closely and what I did see was tons of conflicting narratives depending on where I was reading or hearing about it. I have no idea who to believe. Probably they’re both shitty people.

              None of this has anything to do with my comment about the justice system, which was in response to yours asking about the verdict, compensation, etc. as though those things mean truth. I don’t believe they do mean truth; I’ve had personal limited experience suggesting otherwise and there are plenty of cases that have ruined people’s lives that were later overturned.

              I’m not trying to be combative, but I feel a bit defensive because of what feels to me like vitriol from a random online commenter. If I misunderstood, I apologize.

    • xkbx@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      13 hours ago

      You might be joking but this is legit the reason why dogs look at you when they poop. They are vulnerable when they poop and look to you for reassurance / protection

      • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Do you sometimes look in the mirror and question the life choices that made you a person who talks about worshipping feces on the internet?

  • canniest_tod
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    14 hours ago

    You’re supposed to look away. They’re embarrassed that you’re for some reason watching the poop come out. Don’t do that.

    • AliOski@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Even if he was an abuser, he wasn’t any more of an abuser than she was.

    • Shindo66
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I have actually wondered this from the beginning. I feel like if I hung out with either of them separately over a beer, I would think the other one is crazy.