• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    171 year ago

    Title is irresponsible. It produces no ionizing radiation which is what the layman understands by the word radiation.

    It produces 1.75 watts per kg over the standard. There is no reason to believe this has any effect whatsoever. it’s not clear that the standard is based on anything meaningful whatsoever

  • @SpaceNoodle
    link
    English
    101 year ago

    It took them three years after release to determine this? Were there no FCC-equivalent filings well before then?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      It produces zero radiation like a nuclear reactor and only a little more energy than WiFi. This energy’s only effect is to heat adjacent tissue but much less than the actual heat produced.

      • @SpaceNoodle
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        They just like using the weasel word “radiation” to make boomers & older gen Xers scared.

        • Artair Geal
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          I’m Gen X and I’ve been in Information Technology for twenty-eight years. My generation was there at the dawn of personal computing. Yes, there are less technically-savvy people in every generational group, but “older Gen Xers” might consider what you’ve said to be… hmm, what’s the right term? Oh, yes. “Bullshit stereotyping based on age” is the term I’m grasping for here.

          I’m well aware of the ELF (Extremely Low-Frequency Radiation) panic. This actually started in the 1970s and rose to national prominence around the late 90s, when it was covered to death by every news outlet. And it was just as silly then as it is now. France is just being France.

          And that has little or nothing to do with which generational group you call home.

    • revs
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      They tested on release (it passed), they then re-tested recently (it failed)

      • @orclev
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        I’m far more likely to believe they screwed up the retest than I am that France suddenly found something everyone else missed. Also 4 watts is nothing. I’d maybe start to get a little worried if it was putting out 40 watts, although even that much is still pretty minimal.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    On Tuesday, the French watchdog which governs radio frequencies also told the tech giant to fix existing phones.

    The ANFR has advised Apple that if it cannot resolve the issue via a software update, it must recall every iPhone 12 ever sold in the country.

    But the World Health Organization has previously sought to allay fears about radiation emitted by mobile phones.

    Apple told the BBC it was contesting the ANFR’s review, and said it had provided the regulator with lab results from the tech giant itself and third parties which show the device is compliant with all the relevant rules.

    France’s digital minister Jean-Noel Barrot told French newspaper Le Parisien the decision was due to radiation levels above the acceptable threshold, according to Reuters.

    It comes as the Chinese foreign ministry issued a rebuttal against media reports which claimed government agencies had told staff to stop using iPhones.


    The original article contains 477 words, the summary contains 149 words. Saved 69%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • @Motecuhzoma
    link
    English
    4
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m sure Apple, who just released the iPhone 15 and was discontinuing the 12 anyway, will be devastated by this