Edit: please excuse the typo. I probably shouldn’t use Sunforged as an editor.

Bonus gif!

  • CassowaryTom@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 years ago

    Good Sir, I am far too.old and grumpy to be excusing typos. You should be ashamed. I demand a retraction, and I will be writing a very tersely worded letter to your editor.

    • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      This meme compaiont contains too many letters. Please remove three. I am not a crackpot

      • CassowaryTom@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Of course you arent. I submit my revised comment:

        Good Person, I am far too crotchety to be excusing typos. You should be ashamed. I demand a retraction, and I will be writing a very tersely worded letter to your editor.

        I think that you will find that taking into consideration the unused spaces I have met your requirements, but of course I welcome any notes that you may have. - Cas

  • captainlezbian
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 years ago

    Star Wars is like the defining fantasy space opera. Star Trek is peak episodic sci fi. The fact that such wildly different genres can fall under sci fi is part of what makes the genre both fascinating and nonsense as a categorization. And that’s not even bringing space westerns into the fold.

    • AEsheron
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      As a fan of both, neither are truly Sci-fi. They both use it as dressing, but one is an action fantasy and the other is drama with emphasis on social commentary. Neither are really harder sci-fi than the other in the grand scheme of fiction. Star Wars may even be a bit better in that at least they don’t try to explain most of the tech so it can’t self contradict as much as Trek does.

  • netburnr
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Typo in the first panel was really confusing.

    • Nouveau_BurnswickOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t think my region’s definition of materialistic is the same as yours, I’m not sure what you’re trying to say?

      • magnusrufus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        I think Theo had made it clear they gave no idea what materialistic means.

      • theodewere@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        makes me wonder if one’s worldview is materialistic, whether your definition of the word would be useful… because it would be coming from inside materialism, which we wouldn’t want to trust to be honest about itself…

  • scarabic
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    I don’t think DS9 is universally held up as the best but it has a unique subset of Trek fans who absolutely love it. Their enthusiasm for their favorite might actually peak higher than any other title’s fans. But they are not a majority.

  • MajorHavoc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    I just know there could be a bonus panel here where one of them smacks baby Grogu, but I can’t think of it.

  • XeroxCool
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    What framing device and how is DS9 different in that sense? Like how the story is framed as a mirror to current society?