• @Sludgehammer
    link
    English
    961 year ago

    The funny thing is that some medieval bricklayer made a conscious choice here, he could have put that brick paw-print down and made a flawless floor. Now, here we are getting a chuckle out of some unknown bricklayer’s little gag centuries later.

    • @telllos
      link
      521 year ago

      I’m also wondering if those are not fake prints. They look pretty deep. I don’t think a cat walking on drying bricks would leave such deep marks.

      To me they look like easter eggs left by the brick layer.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Maybe they’re deep because of water erosion from rains over a thousand years, those bricks look pretty polished.

          • @CitizenKong
            link
            81 year ago

            Also, wouldn’t water erosion make them less deep not more, due to generally smoothing the stone?

            • @HonoraryMancunian
              link
              21 year ago

              Maybe water pools in them long after it dries out on the surrounding brick, but whether still water still erodes stone I don’t know.

      • GreatAlbatross
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        It’s possible. I have paw prints of varying size and pressure in the concrete around my house (thanks cat).

        The ones from super wet concrete look almost like a duck/goblin footprint, the ones in drier screed look like those tiles, but much less deep.

    • Jordan Lund
      link
      fedilink
      English
      241 year ago

      As a cat owner, this doesn’t even look like a real print. It’s too deep. Most likely a manufactured print done as a gag by whoever made the bricks.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        The car walked on the brick before it was burned (the brick).

        Like when you put a fork in a cake to check if it’s done. The hole will be bigger when it’s heated afterwards.

        I don’t think it’s a deliberate prank, just a not my job situation.

    • Zellith
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Wouldn’t he have needed to change the brick? If you flip it then it wouldn’t fit there any more since its shape is asymmetrical.

  • The Menemen!
    link
    221 year ago

    I live in a house build in the late 1800s. There are names and dates carved into the brick facade from 70 years ago. I think that is kinda cool.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    101 year ago

    I kind of have fun imagining a kitty being told not to walk there. And being a kitty, they immediately walked there.

  • WhyIDie
    link
    fedilink
    91 year ago

    and no other prints around, so the cat came out and, of course, immediately went back in

    • @Madison420
      link
      21 year ago

      These would have been made, fired, and then brought inside. There’s probably more prints but they’re probably on the underside of the tile.

    • WhyIDie
      link
      fedilink
      -1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      to the ackchyuallies here: I know, but relax and enjoy the mental image of the fiction

  • @cyborganickname
    link
    51 year ago

    Possibly whittled out of the brick long after installation, by a bored funster, using a crude round-tipped tool ?

    • Nepenthe
      link
      fedilink
      -11 year ago

      Wouldn’t it take 79 years to do that to brick, though? Someone would notice

      • @jaybone
        link
        81 year ago

        He covered it up with a Rita Hayworth poster.

  • Haus
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    There’s a St. Peter’s in Wormleighton and a St. Mary’s in Priors Hardwick… I wonder which one they’re talking about.