• uphillbothways
    link
    fedilink
    68
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    For some reason if people couch their hate as a religion it becomes a protected right, which is just one reason we should reverse that shit. Religion is bullshit, should be outlawed, and religious people are ignorant, abusive cowards.

    • @TruthOf
      link
      431 year ago

      We need freedom from religion not freedom of religion

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        It would solve a lot of problems though.

        How about this, freedom to practice your religion, but only in private places. Like a “Don’t Say Doctrine” law

        • @AstridWipenaugh
          link
          41 year ago

          It’s really tempting to agree to ban public displays and mention of homosexuality if we can also do so for all religion. It’s a one step backwards, two miles forward situation…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I mean that’s what France was going for when they banned burqas, the idea was that people are free to express their religion privately but not in public. I personally think if you’re going to take people’s rights to wear a certain piece of fabric in a certain way away like that, the ends definitely don’t justify the means.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        I kind of always thought that’s why the first amendment said there should be no national religion

    • @RedditWanderer
      link
      211 year ago

      In my experience, religious institutions are ignorant, abusive cowards.

      • @RGB3x3
        link
        24
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Nah, so are the people. If people weren’t such ignorant cowards, they wouldn’t use religion as an excuse to be abusive.

        • @3laws
          link
          121 year ago

          Removed by mod

        • @RedditWanderer
          link
          31 year ago

          There are billions of people privately practicing/ believing their religion and not bothering you with it, while there are only a couple thousand of institutions/ powerful people using it to abuse people.

          Religions should be left out of politics, but people are still allowed to say/ believe what they want in their own space. (I’m not religious btw)

          • @RGB3x3
            link
            81 year ago

            It’s those billions of people quietly using their votes to put people in power who make life harder for so many people.

            Religion should be left out of politics, but rarely ever is because all those religious people want their religion to inform political decisions. And that’s true whether they admit it or not.

            • @RedditWanderer
              link
              -81 year ago

              Again, “all those religious people” keep religion out of politics in most cases. You’re thinking of the loud minority.

                • @RedditWanderer
                  link
                  -6
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  From the minority? Are you having trouble reading? It’s okay I’ll explain it again, education is hard to come by these days.

                  If you take the US for example, if all religious people were diehard people trying to replace your rights with the word of god, you’d have a dominant conservative majority every year. The minority is exactly the small group of conservatives who are trying to use religion to fire up their base.

                  The truth is more than 75% of people are religious in the US, but only a minority use it to support draconic policies from the right. A lot of them are democrats or other not bothering you with their beliefs, and leaving it out of politics. You’re confusing all religious people and religious institutions/groups.

                  +80% of people on earth are religious. Thats 58,000 million people…if they all used their beliefs to dictate policy we’d be back to the middle ages.

                • @RedditWanderer
                  link
                  0
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Lmao, Roe v Wade was overturned by a conservative supreme court, with a crooked republican party using the religious minority to gain support, not by a popular vote. Tell me you don’t know what you’re talking about without telling you don’t know what you’re talking about.

          • @TheHighRoad
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            I think most religious people are victims themselves. Problem is they don’t realize it, so they just perpetuate it and the cycle continues.

            • @RedditWanderer
              link
              01 year ago

              You’re saying I’m not an atheist either? How did you conclude that inspector Clouseau?

              What I think other’s are allowed to believe in has nothing to do with what I believe in. Why wouldn’t I be an atheist? Why can’t I be an atheist and let people believe in what they want at the same time?

      • @AngryCommieKender
        link
        01 year ago

        How so? I’m being serious here. What freedoms do you lose as an atheist?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          A better wording is “getting extra protections”. Corporations with religious owners have argued their way out of paying for health insurance that covers contraceptives. A high school coach can make a big show of prayer right in the middle of the field (and yes, that’s what he was doing; it wasn’t private at all) and the Supreme Court will say that’s fine. Literal torture is allowed if you call it “gay conversion therapy”

          What the Satanic Temple does is turn all that around. Fine, you get all this stuff under the name of religion? Then so do we. If you think that’s ridiculous, well, yes, it is.

          • @AngryCommieKender
            link
            11 year ago

            That makes more sense to me, thanks. All stuff I personally wouldn’t do, but that’s me.

        • @Bytemeister
          link
          Ελληνικά
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I had to pledge (or at least appear to) allegiance to god and country almost every weekday morning for 12 years. I have god on my money, god on my courthouse, and god on my license plate.

          We have medical advances and procedures outlawed because they deal with fetal stem cells, which is mainly a hold up on the part of religion. People also use religion to reject vaccines willy-nilly, which has a huge impact on public health.

          I’m sure there’s more, this is just off the top of my head while shitposting.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -51 year ago

      It’s one thing that it says something in a book and a totaly different to acctually act after it. If there were a non religious book that was written as long ago as a lot of religious ones and that had the same impact in the past you were still alowed to read that nowadays. But the second you actually do the stuff the Bible says no religion protection law makes it legal or right. The problem is not the book. The problem are the institutions and a few idiots.

      So don’t make the mistake of generalizing everybody just because they are religious, because then you’re making the same mistake those religious idiots.

      And religion shouldn’t be outlawed. That just creates a world where the people who believe in religion will have to hide their beliefs. The correct way is to stop giving Christianity special treatment and start treating them as normal people who happen to believe in something.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          But thats exactly what I said was not ok. There is a big difference between some old book saying something and people actually acting after it.

  • Ignotum
    link
    441 year ago

    Most religious books tell you to kill religious people, people with a different religion that is

    • @tacosplease
      link
      101 year ago

      Most religions agree with all atheists with the exception of whatever god they happen to believe in.

      I grew up in a Christian school, and they taught us how ridiculous Mormonism is – calling it a cult. Same for Jehovah’s Witnesses, Seventh Day Adventists… There was a whole curriculum for it in our Bible class.

      We spent months talking dog shit about all the other religions while unironically praising our own dogma. My school taught that the King James Bible is 100% literal. LOL

      They even told us Catholicism is basically a cult, but it’s too big to call it one.

      • Dizzy Devil Ducky
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        If bashing other sects of your own religion as a required school activity doesn’t sum up some major of problems with Christianity, I don’t know what does.

    • 小莱卡
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      i remember joshua(?) book explicitly calling for the razing and cursing of the towns they conquered.

  • @Wilibus
    link
    281 year ago

    Can they at least not use a corpse nailed to some pieces of wood as a symbol.

    • @Cabrio
      link
      19
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s ok, he’s a Middle Eastern Jewish Socialist, their symbols represent Christians perfectly.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      51 year ago

      They’re just showing what they would do to other Jews if they could get away with it.

      • 新星 [he/him/CPC bot]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        To our Jewish comrades, I hope you have had a meaningful Yom Kippur.

        To any Christians reading, why aren’t you fasting? Didn’t Jesus say not even the smallest part of law was abolished?

    • @IjonTichy
      link
      81 year ago

      why was same sex marriage and cannabis often legalized at the same time? because if a man lies with another man they should be stoned…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    131 year ago

    I don’t have a book that says so, but I’m all for throwing religious extremists off of tall buildings.