• Boring@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I created an account while in the store with an email of [email protected] and a basic password and surprisingly didn’t have to verify the email. Then turned on a VPN to my house.

    I plan on just creating a new account every time I go in just to fill up their database with nonsense.

    • geekworking
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You do realize that they are actually tracking the device itself by the hardware MAC address and other device fingerprints.

      The email is just a bonus to let them legally spam you. Anti-spam laws have an exemption. If there’s a prior business relationship like shopping in their stores, they can put you on their spam list unless you opt out.

      Bogus email only helps for spam but doesn’t do anything about tracking.

      EDIT: For Android when there’s a Captive Portal like the screen shot. devices will use Persistent randomization which while not the hardware MAC will remain the same for the same network where they can track your visits.

      • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Pretty much all modern phones randomize the MAC address everytime they connect to a network unless the user explicitly says not to do that.

        • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          randomize the MAC address everytime they connect to a network

          +1, had issues using Android devices for presence detection because of this very useful privacy feature. Even on your home network, the MAC address and device hostname get randomized, unless disabled in the settings

          Edit: typo

        • geekworking
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          When there’s a Captive Portal like the screenshot, many devices use a random but persistent mac for that network avoid reauthorization after any network drop. This will make your access to the specific network trackable.

          • Midnight Wolf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            chuckles in GrapheneOS

            (per-connection random MAC, for all networks, by default)

            • Molecular0079
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              This is actually just part of stock Android. My Pixel 5 has MAC randomization on by default for new Wi-Fi networks.

              • Midnight Wolf
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s per-network, not per-connection. Though that option does exist but is hidden away under developer settings.

          • Boring@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            But can’t you go manually forget the network in your device network options to circumvent this?

          • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’d assume after a certain amount of time or after moving far enough away from the network it “forgets” the last randomized MAC address?

            It doesn’t really make sense to store these things long term.

      • Boring@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        GrapheneOS let’s me do a per-connection randomized MAC.

        I’m sure they do collect a lot more about my device, but there’s not much I can do about it short of wrapping my phone in tin foil.

        • Midnight Wolf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Don’t forget to disable wifi and bluetooth before approaching the store, as those give off unique identifiers too.

    • Zastyion345@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Don’t forget to spoof your MAC address so they cant see who is making the fake accounts ;D

      • TheGoldenGod
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly, a damn good reason to avoid the Wi-Fi in stores altogether. So many wifi access points are super weak in security and super sketchy.

        I try sticking to my home where I can manage it like a nervous hawk.

      • Nahvi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is a fantastic read.

        I remember febreeze coming out and being like, that would be cool but you can’t trust ads and it sounds like total BS. I knew they added a scent, but I had not idea about the subtle social manipulation that they used to shift people’s habits.

        Speaking of habits, this is the first time I have heard about all the science involved in studying and breaking them.

        Thank you for that link. Definitely going to save it.

      • hperrin
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Now they can tell when women are pregnant before they even have sex.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not really. With https luckily being the default, at most they could get the sites you were going to (I don’t think dnss is dead, but it’s been very slow to grow unfortunately).

          They could probably see if you’re checking Amazon or Google, but wouldn’t be able to see what you’re looking at exactly. Theoretically they could use cameras and or triangulation to see what you’re in front of when you use the Internet, but a VPN would still show traffic so they’d know you’re looking up something.

          The big thing this would do is act like a loyalty card… They give you some amount of benefit in exchange for tracking your purchases in ever higher detail. Mostly it’s just like that, except they’d also be able to see how long you are in the store, and ideally they can link it to your purchases so they can infer more about it

          FWIW, I wouldn’t only consider giving them a disposable email

  • squiblet@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    At least they’re telling you. There’s also a lot of hidden surveillance in stores - they’ve done it with Bluetooth and cameras for some time. Things like monitoring how long you look at products and evaluating your reactions to displays.

    • rynzcycle@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s why I always introduce a good bit of entropy to my shopping patterns:

      -Enter and go straight to produce
      -Spend 20 minutes examining eggplants
      -Walk up and down 5 aisles pausing exactly the square of the aisle number in seconds.
      -Grab a box of tampons
      -Grab what I need as quickly as possible
      -Return tampons
      -Checkout and leave

      Somewhere a marketing team is spending hours trying to figure out how to improve the conversion rates for tampons and eggplants for customers in my demo.

      • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t forget to flick and knock on various fruits and vegetables. Randomize how many flicks/knocks per item, and throw in a few on produce items that normally don’t get that kind of test e.g. grapes or potatoes.

        • Linus_Torvalds
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wait, there are fruits/veggies that get this kind of treatment by typical customers? Please list a few.

          • korok@possumpat.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Melons and squashes (inc. pumpkins).

            I believe the idea is to allow you to roughly evaluate the density of the produce, to avoid e.g. mushy grainy watermelon or weird squashes that don’t have their expected hollowness.

  • Polar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why would anyone interested in privacy connect to any public WiFi? That’s crazy.

    • thanevim@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      When you need service, but data is blocked by all the steel in the ceiling/roof. I’ve used it, but with my VPN active. I wonder if they’re now going to try to block VPN services?

      • Midnight Wolf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just VPN to your home network. What are they going to do, block every IP but theirs?

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    In the EU they already had a complaint, because it violates GDPR, but in any case I would never use a public WiFi without a VPN, and even less in places with these conditions, there is also free WiFi in some Rstaurants (even in most McDonalds), public Libraries and others. Fuck surveillance advertising

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s just no reason to unless you are really skimping on phone data. Random wifi hotspots are one of the most dangerous things for an average joe in terms of infosec.

    • justcoding_de@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed. My iPhone connects to my home VPN via Wireguard as soon as I leave my home WiFi. Has the added benefit of pihole ad filtering everywhere.

      • Serinus
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So the first thing you give any sketchy WiFi is your home address?

        • justcoding_de@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yup. What are they gonna do that every other portscanning bad actor isn’t doing 24/7 already?

          Also, how would they distinguish between my private VPN and that of a commercial provider?

        • justcoding_de@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Obviously the first ad links in google don’t work any more, which drives the wife crazy ;-) Also nowadays more and more websites complain about me using an adblocker.

          But technically, not really any problems at all.

        • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          In the 6 years I’ve ran mine, I’ve not had any issues and I run a blocklist with over 1 million domains on it.

          If I was to run into something that’s blocked that I do want loaded, I can just open the pihole interface and either whitelist the blocked domain or disable blocking for a short time, each with just a couple clicks.

        • lud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I used to before but my family was extremely bothered that they couldn’t click on ad links. If I remember correctly, it’s pretty easy to set up if you want to just try it.

    • XTornado@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I have seen it on Europe… maybe there was some way to circumvent it hidden away, not sure. But you could type a random email and that’s it, like they don’t send anything to confirm the email or anything once you submit you have access to internet.

    • Resolved3874@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Went to a Walmart the other day and my phone automatically connected to a wifi that was apparently hosted by my cell carrier. Immediately turned on my VPN because wtf. I disconnected at first then realized I didn’t have any service at all which was probably why it existed. Thankfully didn’t need to log in but that’s why I have Firefox relay.

          • Cort
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            UK gdpr not withstanding, the question asked was: where in Europe. UK remains a part of Europe post brexit.

          • Astigma@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The provisions of the EU GDPR have been incorporated directly into UK law as the UK GDPR. It’s ok to not know this stuff but it only takes like 10 seconds to google before you comment about something you don’t know.

      • Zerush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        AFAIK it does not exist in Europe, but I meant that these conditions in the EU would not be tolerated. Maybe because of this there isn’t a Walmart in the EU, there are a lot of Malls from other companies and none of these use this practices in their restaurants, mostly with free WiFi for their visitors. Offering free WiFi is already enough of a benefit for them, because it attracts customers, they do not need to intrude on their privacy with an obvious attempt to spam them and make money with their data.

    • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They seem to explain pretty well how your data will be used, why would this violate GDPR?

  • Deleted@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why are all you mother fuckers shopping at Walmart. They are a welfare corporation offloading their costs to tax payers because despite making tons of money they pay shit and skirt employee benefits laws by keeping worker hours low and give new employees info on how to get financial aid such as food stamps.

    • eee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is the most privileged thing you could say.

      “Hey, why isn’t everyone eating sustainably sourced GMO-free, organic, locally-grown food all the time?”

      Spoiler alert: it costs more

      • whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, this is the thing. Does literally anyone want to go to Walmart? No. Is it the place I can afford? Increasingly, still no. Not sure I can even afford to walk past whatever the good version of a Whole Foods is today, though.

      • mushroom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Haha exactly. People shop at Walmart because they work at target and don’t make enough money to shop at Whole Foods.

    • Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cause WinCo doesn’t always have what I need, but most importantly:

      I’m poor.

    • nathris@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because all of the other retailers do the same shit only with higher prices. Here in Canada they don’t pay their employees any less than the competition, yet their prices are 30-40% cheaper on average.

      That extra 40% doesn’t result in better working conditions for the employees, it goes directly to the shareholders and bonuses for the C-suite.

      I respect the hell out of Walmart because they actually keep their price increases tied to inflation and aren’t out there trying to sell a loaf of poverty white bread for $5 or a pack of 4 chicken breasts for $37.

      • settinmoon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I got some insight from a friend who works at a major supplier for these retail stores in Canada. He said how they manage prices is that when they anticipate a rise in cost they’ll jack the price all the way to a future projected target instead of following the current inflationary rate so that they won’t need to constantly quote their customers different prices. They don’t care because they know it will get passed downstream.

    • Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cause I get shit service in Walmart and don’t really have any other option if I need to look something up while shopping.

      • ManosTheHandsOfFate
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I live near a shopping area with a bunch of stores. It has zero cell coverage from any provider. Apparently there’s been some NIMBY resistance to putting up towers in nearby neighborhoods.

    • trippingonthewire@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Fair, but even using your normal router without a VPN isn’t good imo. Even if it’s not as bad as public. And VPNs are usually an extreme measure. If I was using public WiFi, and doing stuff on my bank account, then yes, VPN all the way, but I usually don’t feel that I need it.

  • Bappity
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    it’s not like they weren’t doing this before

  • 8tomat8
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I always give some bs emails in those authentication forms. Mainly because as a client who tries to connect, I do not have internet access, so I cannot verify my email before they give me the access. And when they gave me access, there is no power in the world to make me do that 🤷

      • Case@unilem.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I found a script for bypassing captive portals on Linux back in the day…

        The full functionality of how it works escapes me at the moment, but essentially it searches the network for a host that possibly already connected through the captive portal and spoofs their MAC address.

        This isn’t the one I originally found, but its the same principal and a Kali tool, so it may be considered more secure than the original bash script I copied back in the day:

        https://en.kali.tools/?p=724

        • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I used to use an android app that shared log ins for public Wi-Fi even with a password to connwct. It was great as it automated the log in screen too, so was usually seamless.

      • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Android automatically spoofs your MAC for every network and regularly changes it for each one too unless you explicitly disable that after connecting.

        Makes static DHCP leases a PITA.

  • XTornado@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not sure about this Walmart case but most you can write any email like random letters [email protected] or not even the Gmail part as long as it’s a valid looking mail and then works like you don’t even have to confirm the email or anything.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      this is incorrect for the walmart case, next step is the password for the account, so you need to login or create a Walmart account for access

      • XTornado@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh yeah I see I mis read the prompt, I thought it was going with a enter you mail as alternative to using an account.