A set of merge requests were opened that would effectively drop X.Org (X11) session support for the GNOME desktop and once that code is removed making it a Wayland-only desktop environment.

Going along with Fedora 40 looking to disable the GNOME X11 session support (and also making KDE Plasma 6 Wayland-only for Fedora), upstream GNOME is evaluating the prospect of disabling and then removing their X11 session support.

Some concerns were raised already how this could impact downstream desktops like Budgie and Pantheon that haven’t yet fully transitioned over to Wayland. In any event we’ll see where the discussions lead but it’s sure looking like 2024 will be the year that GNOME goes Wayland-only.

    • @dack
      link
      281 year ago

      I think they already have. I held off on Wayland on my main machine for a long time due to Nvidia issues. For example, I was getting rendering issues where some windows/popups would be totally invisible until I moused over them. Those issues are now gone, and I’ve been running Wayland for the last few months with no problems at all.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        On Debian at least, Wayland is unusable for me. The whole desktop lags and makes it impossible to actually point the mouse. I’m guessing the updated Nvidia drivers fixed this?

        • @lightnegative
          link
          41 year ago

          Debian is a spectrum.

          If you mean Debian stable, then yes, try again in 10 years when today’s software versions become available

    • @merthyr1831
      link
      51 year ago

      NVidia won’t do shit until they’re forced to, which is probably why it’s come to this “force everyone over even if its not 100% ready” changeover

  • @seaQueue
    link
    611 year ago

    Oh hey, it’s this months regularly scheduled Wayland drama!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    571 year ago

    They still haven’t solved the problem of a Gnome Shell crash taking down my entire session with it. I need to be able to restart the shell independently of the Wayland compositor for me to switch.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    511 year ago

    Well let’s hope that massively improves the Wayland experience then. I tried it last week and still had flickering screens, laggy windows, and crashing games. In the current state it would be unacceptable for me to switch

    • @echo64
      link
      38
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      depends if nvidia care about improving wayland, they don’t really have any reason to care today. Maybe if people start purchasing hardware from their competition enough.

      I’m having a perfect time on intel at least. Though I have no video game requirements.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        101 year ago

        My problem is that I’m kinda tied to CUDA and thus Nvidia. If AMD’s ROCm would’ve been a bit better and supported on consumer GPUs I would’ve went for that.

        But having a non-NVIDIA card in order to use the latest GNOME doesn’t seem reasonable to me. Then again, maybe the pressure will finally make NVIDIA get their shit together

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          161 year ago

          considering how willing they were to throw vendors like EVGA under the bus, trying to figure out what pressure Nvidia listens too might be a challenge in of of itself …

        • @echo64
          link
          61 year ago

          I’m gonna assume you can use Cuda, without driving the display with nvidia. You just need a motherboard with onboard Intel

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            That seems like a rather extreme work-around for Wayland proponent delusions. Buying an nvidia card and then not using it for graphics at all.

            • @echo64
              link
              21 year ago

              I was offering solutions to ops problem, is that not allowed?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                51 year ago

                Funny that people are downvoting when this is what hybrid graphics in laptops do. The iGPU to drive the display and heavier tasks get offloaded to the dGPU

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -11 year ago

            That’s gonna make gaming a lot harder though. And I’m on an AMD CPU. I’m not sure whether it has an internal GPU even. My point is that they’ll lose a lot of users by forcing Wayland. I’m not dure Nvidia will care for such pressure

            • @echo64
              link
              61 year ago

              Yeah, but kde is also heading down the same path. The world can’t keep maintaining a legacy stack forever just because a private company doesn’t care about the problem.

              I know people want things to just work and don’t care about the rest but the reality is that unpaid volunteers do 99% of the work and I don’t really think they should have to do extra work just because of nvidia. Maybe nvidia users get left behind, that would suck. I hope nvidia choose to fix their shit instead.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                01 year ago

                I agree that volunteers shouldn’t have to maintain legacy just because a private company doesn’t have their shit together. But the reality is that a lot of people have Nvidia hardware. If GNOME and KDE will not work on the most popular gaming GPU brand, we’re going to push away a lot of people who are trying to start with Linux but encounter a broken mess.

                • @echo64
                  link
                  11 year ago

                  Sounds like you don’t agree that

                  “volunteers shouldn’t have to maintain legacy just because a private company doesn’t have their shit together”

                  you think they should, to avoid pushing people away.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      191 year ago

      I had the same problems until I switched to an AMD card. Since then it’s been smooth sailing in Wayland.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    441 year ago

    What’s everyone’s Wayland showstopper?

    I’m holding out for better autoclickers/macro recorders before I go to Wayland

    • 👁️👄👁️
      link
      fedilink
      English
      301 year ago

      Better Wine support. It’s coming soon, but I prefer xorg until Wine properly supports Wayland.

        • Communist
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          I would say Xwayland is good ENOUGH, but it’s not great, my clipboard with xwayland is awful on sway, for example. It works, but not the best.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I recently stopped switching to x11 for gaming. With most games, the performance is 5-10fps better on Wayland

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 year ago

      Honestly, Wayland just doesn’t give the impression of working well enough with everything to replace my window manager and all kinds of utilities that grew around it (or X11 in general) for a decade or two just to only notice after using it for a few weeks that it won’t work with some things. It demands a huge time investment up front for questionable gain basically.

      • Semperverus
        link
        English
        32
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        As a multimonitor user with mixed properties, and an AMD user, Wayland has been nothing but a massive gain for me and continues to get better in equally massive strides on KDE (been using kwin-wayland for almost a full year as a daily driver now). It even improved the user experience on my surface pro that I’m running the surface-linux kernel on.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          I am not using a Desktop Environment and if switching to Wayland means I will have to give up tiling window managers for DEs I will never switch to Wayland.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -31 year ago

              Considering how many things Wayland apparently still lacks that need to be implemented in each compositor separately a last release in February sounds like a half-dead project.

              • FOSS Is Fun
                link
                fedilink
                English
                81 year ago

                Sway is based on wlroots and therefore does not need to implement the complete Wayland specification itself. Many other Wayland window managers are also based on wlroots and therefore share a common base (compositor).

                Furthermore Sway’s git repo has activity up to a couple of days ago: https://github.com/swaywm/sway/commits/master

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                Dude, why are you so annoying about this topic? sway is a very good tiling window manager that IIRC two years ago was able to do things X11 based window managers will never be able to (different VRR on multiple monitors) and its basically the reference manager for wlroots, a library implementing the Wayland functionality. I’ve been using Wayland exclusively since about 2021 and I can say all my stuff now works better than under X11. Does it mean everything under the sun works better or is possible? Probably not, but at the same time, the people putting in the work have decided that the old concept was no longer maintainable for them and no one else is willing to pick it up.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  5
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Dude, why are you so annoying about this topic?

                  Because Wayland proponents have been at it for over a decade now pointing at their broken mess saying “look, everything works” and yet somehow the longer these posts stick around the more comments accumulate about things that do not work, and not minor edge cases either but major features like screen recording, games, one of two major graphics cards vendors, remote desktop, significant applications not working,… I am sick and tired of this broken project pretending it is ready to replace X11 over and over and over again.

                  If they had acknowledged that it was 20% done, 40% done, 60% done (that is maybe where it is now) it would be different but Wayland developers seem to live in their own bubble where “works on my machine sometimes, with half of all applications” is considered done.

                  Today I can install any game, any application on Linux and know it works with X11, no ifs, no “only on that vendor”, no “only on the latest unreleased bleeding edge version”. Why should I give that up for years of Wayland pain just to get back to where I started minus the things Wayland will never implement like network transparency.

              • Communist
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                The project you’re looking for is called wlroots, everything will be based on it eventually, the only compositors that aren’t are gnome and kde and that’s because they made their compositors BEFORE wlroots existed.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          But where it the long-term profit? Every time Wayland comes up in the last 15 or so years since it was first mentioned somewhere it is an endless list of comments about things that don’t work and “will work soon” ™. Meanwhile in all that time there hasn’t been a single exploit for the security issues Wayland claims to fix. X11 has worked just fine for all this time.

          I am not opposed to replacing things in general (e.g. I do like systemd and never want init scripts back) but Wayland just seems like a bad design with bad goals and bad implementations.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              01 year ago

              That talks about typical implementation vulnerabilities. I am talking about the kind of vulnerabilities the Wayland design supposedly protects us from by design.

              • Communist
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You do realize you’re comparing wayland to a protocol that doesn’t even make an attempt at stopping keylogging, screengrabbing, or really implements any form of security whatsoever, right? I could make a list but it’d be effort, you should really research this stuff before you spread FUD on accident.

                I’m just going to point out that there’s a reason EVERY SINGLE PERSON who worked on X11 has moved onto wayland. Imagine how hard of a sell it’d be for most people to move on from a project that has THIRTY YEARS of work, to redoing everything from scratch, how many people in any other situation would ALL choose rewriting from scratch.

                They learned from their mistakes, and that’s why they restarted from scratch.

    • @seaQueue
      link
      181 year ago

      Mine’s mostly just bad electron app support for native Wayland. In theory Electron now offers full Wayland support but hooooo boy is it going to be a while until all of the electron garbage I use finally updates to a new enough version for proper support.

      The other gotcha is just general client side decorations support for apps in general. I’m shocked that no one has built a small libadwaita wrapper library that implements client side decorations for apps. It’s going to be ages until app developers all implement their own (crummy) CSD that doesn’t match system themes at all.

      • alufers
        link
        fedilink
        91 year ago

        You can still use XWayland though, it’s not going anywhere. They are only removing the ability to run a X11-only session.

        • @seaQueue
          link
          51 year ago

          Yeah, fair - they’re not so much showstoppers as persistent irritations.

    • ISometimesAdmin
      link
      fedilink
      161 year ago

      I play Heroes of the Storm through Lutris.
      I have a superultrawide 32:9 monitor.
      In X11, I can get HotS to scale past its normal limits just like I could in windows and take up a full 5120x1440 resolution.
      In Wayland, I can’t.
      I will die on this hill.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        thy gamescope(that run on steam deck) i think it can scale, if yes, so it’s an implementation issue, that need to be fixed by the compositor

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -81 year ago

          need to be fixed by the compositor

          It is a Wayland issue that things like this need to be fixed per compositor. Honestly, what were the designers thinking?

          • Communist
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Why should it not be fixed by the compositor, exactly?

            As far as I see it, that’s a smart design choice, the issue is just that we needed a universal implementation, an x.org equivalent, and we now have that with wlroots, now that that exists, there’s no downsides to that approach, as far as i’m aware.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              In what way exactly does that make it a smart design choice. It sounds like compositor implementers essentially have to work around the bad design choice by including a library and even then each compositor will have to update the dependency version for wlroots each time something needs to be fixed that breaks the wlroots ABI (or for containers, static linking,… just each time).

              • Communist
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                No, it sounds like compositors will use a library so that they don’t have to do a shitload of work that they’d have to do otherwise.

                …this is already how x.org works. You have to implement the x.org server, or create your own implementation of X11.

                The only reason you think your criticism doesn’t apply to X.org is because nobody updates X.org anymore… There’s no more breaking changes to be made because it’s a fundamentally broken, shitty protocol.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            the compositor need to implement the option to change resolution, how could wayland(the protocol) dictate it?, it don’t have a feasible way to do it, what could help is less fragmentation, like using wlroot, but again wayland(protocol) don’t habe a way to dictate it

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              If they had kept the window manager concept, separating mechanism and policy they would have only needed one implementation for all the mechanisms.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                yes, they could have made the implementation from the start, and that is a valid criticism to wayland(i also agree), but we have wlroots now, and they are working very close with KDE(in one of the devs blog they even said about KDE being ported to wlroots in the future), except for gnome, every DE are working together

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        This is probably the blocker for me, too. There are some other things but this one just feels amateur.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      10
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Autotype for password managers. I don’t only have passwords which I use in my browser for which the plugin is fine. But other apps require autotype. And copy & paste can’t be the solution for this missing feature.

    • dinckel
      link
      71 year ago

      For me personally, none. Until around 2 years ago, it was Nvidia, for Kwin usage on desktop, but before that, I was happily using Wayland sessions and WMs on my laptops for some years

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      I use my laptop for work presentations and running a presentation with embedded videos doesn’t work on external displays.

      • qwesx
        link
        fedilink
        181 year ago

        It’s never going to happen on Wayland level. It’s absolutely no problem to implement this on a compositor level.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Actually libEI allows for exactly this. It’s very new so not widely supported yet but it’ll definitely get there eventually.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      SteamVR doesn’t work on GNOME Wayland because it’s missing DRM (the thing that’s needed to use the display of the VR headset)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      For whatever reason it can’t seem to suspend my thinkpad. Everything crashes and when I open the lid I have to log in again :/

      • @piexil
        link
        71 year ago

        Is that a Wayland issue? Lots of modern laptops have suspend issues (broken S0ix sleep, missing S3, bios declaring wrong states, etc)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          I can only assume it’s wayland causing the crash. When I run gnome45 in x11, it suspends and resumes normally, but when I run in wayland upon resume everything is gone, regardless of what was running. I’ve combed through dmesg to find out what’s happening but it hasn’t been too fruitful so far.

          • @piexil
            link
            11 year ago

            What hardware is your Thinkpad? Is it amd?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      I found no Remote Desktop solution to be working well together with wayland. (I’m not quite sure, if wayland was the cause of the issues I had with RDP and VNC, have to test that). The proprietary Remote Desktop all show a warning that wayland is not supported. While TeamViewer does kinda work, despite the warning, it is not a very sable connection.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Nice 😃 i currently am a GNOME user (love the animations) but if GNOME on Xorg is no option anymore and GNOME on Wayland still does not work for me, I may have to switch to Plasma on Wayland and use this Thank you very much😇

      • TurboWafflz
        link
        21 year ago

        I don’t know if this would work for whatever your remote desktop needs are specifically, but I use Sunshine and it works really well.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I have a older iMac running openSuse tumbleweed GNOME and would like to be able waking it up using my iPad an start a remote season in my iPad from my couch/kitchen, so I can watch my child while do some fun linux stuff (I’m relatively new in the scene) First problem is the waking up part: I had to forcefully disable susbend because the screen was always very glitchy upon wake up (open source readon driver). I used this command for that: sudo systemctl mask suspend.target So I have to wake the iMac from off state or find another sleep mode or fix hibernate to solve the issue. I plan to research if there is way to use wakeOnLan for that.

          Second problem was the screen remote on wayland which right now resulted in me using teamviewer on GNOME on Xorg. I don’t really like this setup and I’m looking for FOSS alternatives which preferably work on wayland and idealy would allow to ise multytouch gestures.

      • @xohshoo
        link
        11 year ago

        What are you, a rival DCL school alumnus? I mean, not Weston obviously, cause that’s a thing. It’s a better name for a display server than Lincoln-Sudbury or Cambridge Ridge and Latin

        Or are you just traumatized by the 128/Pike interchange traffic?

  • @merthyr1831
    link
    391 year ago

    honestly feels like Wayland won’t get many of the fixes it needs until everyone is forced onto it and sends in bug reports. That’s gonna suck for lots of people including me but maybe it’s now or never

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m kinda on the fence about it. On the one hand that is how it is supposed to work. That the new thing gets better, faster when everyone uses it. However, I liked to watch this dude named Brodie Robertson on youtube and a lot of the major features took years to land in wayland.

      Not because it was hard, no one wanted to do it, or any of the normal reasons you traditionally see in foss. The reason why it took so long usually seems to be the result of having to argue that it should be done. It is honestly mind boggling that things like disabling vsync, global shortcuts, and many other features that many of us take for granted were all initially dismissed as essentially “not even deserving to exist”.

      • Communist
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        These are arguments that should happen, they ensure that things in the protocol are done the right way, else there will be a massive duplication of effort as the protocol changes to something better.

      • @merthyr1831
        link
        31 year ago

        Yeah the political side of FOSS is the most frustrating part for everyone involved. I will say however that at least if Brodie’s videos are to be believed, Wayland is now actually being pushed to make decisions instead of fence-sitting for years (which is easy when your project isn’t hitting crunch time yet)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          The politics of FOSS are 100% why I have next to no interest in getting involved beyond small fixes if I come across them.

          I’m not going to argue with a bunch of neurodivergent people about good design.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      but maybe it’s now or never

      That’s a real damn shame, because X is causing no issues for me.

      It’s weird. As soon as (or even before) something is stable, people are already moving on to the next thing.

      That’s a good way to have a broken system in perpetuity.

  • @endhits
    link
    331 year ago

    Fix the issues with Wayland and everyone will happily make the switch.

    • Infiltrated_ad8271
      link
      fedilink
      441 year ago

      Fix the issues with wayland so that we are all able to use it, before forcing us to move for “our good”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        19
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        In my experience, most of the issues with wayland are caused by applications software not supporting it. If we enter a wayland-only world, developers are pushed towards supporting wayland.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            101 year ago

            You are correct in saying that there are still several problems in both Wayland (e.g. lack of drawing tablet support) and mutter (e.g. tearing protocol non yet implemented). But then you proceed to list problems that are Nvidia’s fault.

            The first is weird, but it probably depends on Nvidia’s kernel driver.

            The second is probably a synchronization issue, so it’s probably due to Nvidia refusing to implement implicit sync, and explicit sync not being yet supported in Linux. But don’t quote me on that.

            Vulkan should work. But video acceleration is definitely absent, and is listed by Nvidia itself among current driver limitations. Try this.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    23
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So what is the name the new GNOME that supports X11?

    Edit: I appreciate the alternative desktops, and they are a great reminder (feel free to keep them coming.)
    My point was that open source projects tend to fork every time a less than popular decision is made. Often, removing support for something is seen as a less popular decision. I anticipate GNOME will fork over this. I have no inside knowledge and will not be leading the charge.

  • @bigboismith
    link
    141 year ago

    Unpopular opinion but

    WE DO NOT BREAK USERSPACE! Seriously. How hard is this rule to understand?

    • Linus Torvalds

    Forcing Nvidia to update drivers by breaking your system otherwise us not the correct way to do it.

    • Kogasa
      link
      fedilink
      821 year ago

      That’s for the kernel. Userspace often breaks userspace.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      231 year ago

      Well, there are better reasons for getting rid of fossil software… Like xorg being a giant clusterhack :)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        Still not convinced Wayland won’t end up the side-line fossil to be perfectly frank. It just isn’t compatible enough considering how long it has been developed and the “every compositor needs to essentially implement the whole protocol itself” model seems like a huge design flaw.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          the “every compositor needs to essentially implement the whole protocol itself” model seems like a huge design flaw.

          It’s amazing that wayland have been developed for so long (even though work on the desktop ecosystem is more recent) and this misconception still exists, lemmy need to try to do something to solve Brandolini’s law .

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Well, it would certainly help if you explained in what way that is a misconception. I mean obviously they can share part of the implementation via libraries but where else do you see that as a misconception?

        • Communist
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          every compositor needs to essentially implement the whole protocol itself

          This is also how X11 works if you choose not to use x.org… wayland is a protocol, the equivalent you’re looking for is wlroots.

          If you use wlroots, you don’t have to do any of that.

          As for why kde/wlroots/gnome are separate… x.org used to have multiple implementations too, until one took over and became used everywhere. Wlroots is the equivalent to x.org, and shares many implementation details with kde, gnome is the only odd one out, and both kde and gnomes implementations only exist because they came before wlroots.

    • aard
      link
      fedilink
      141 year ago

      User space is not breaking often enough for nvidia users. If it’d break regularly maybe users would either buy something with proper support, or force nvidia to open their stuff so it can be maintained like the rest, and no longer is a roadblock for progress.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        nvidia has open-drivers, it’s shit, but they have

        (sometimes i go there to laugh)

        maybe these push can make nvidia fix the problems

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    121 year ago

    Guys, am I the only one?

    I dont care about X11. But some weird things just dont work.

    I have a stupid AMD mobile GPU which seems to neither support virtualization, nor Wine games.

    Also, I only had one keyboard/mouse input at a time, so either shift or running for example. People told me thats because of XWayland.

    Is that a thing? This would be a total dealbreaker

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      131 year ago

      AFAIK wine requires no special hardware support. It isn’t virtualizing anything, it just translates directx calls into OpenGL/Vulkan calls executed by your normal driver. If wine doesn’t work I suspect it’s something else

    • FOSS Is Fun
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Have you enabled virtualisation support in your BIOS/UEFI? Many vendors ship their hardware with this switched off by default (and some hardware actually doesn’t support it at all).

      I don’t have any issues with Xwayland and simultaneous key presses. Tested with Bottles (i. e. WINE), BeamNG (native Linux build) and the games from SCS Software (also Linux-native). I am running Fedora 38 Silverblue with an AMD RX 5500 XT GPU.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    A set of merge requests were opened that would effectively drop X.Org (X11) session support for the GNOME desktop and once that code is removed making it a Wayland-only desktop environment.

    Going along with Fedora 40 looking to disable the GNOME X11 session support (and also making KDE Plasma 6 Wayland-only for Fedora), upstream GNOME is evaluating the prospect of disabling and then removing their X11 session support.

    This merge request would remove the X11 session targets within gnome-session: "This is the first step towards deprecating the x11 session, the systemd targets are removed, but the x11 functionality is still there in so you can restore the x11 session by installing the targets in the appropriate place on your own.

    That was followed by this merge request that would land later on – more than likely, one cycle later – for actually removing the X11 session code.

    Some concerns were raised already how this could impact downstream desktops like Budgie and Pantheon that haven’t yet fully transitioned over to Wayland.

    In any event we’ll see where the discussions lead but it’s sure looking like 2024 will be the year that GNOME goes Wayland-only.


    The original article contains 254 words, the summary contains 193 words. Saved 24%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • @gaybear
    link
    10
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    deleted by creator

  • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏
    link
    fedilink
    101 year ago

    Any X11 forwarding support or emulation of some kind provided by Wayland? Or will apps detect this over the terminal as they usually currently do and render on the remote machine?