- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
Their mission is to enable safe spaceflight. We cannot give up on the safety side, but could there be a little bit more emphasis on the enable side?
Maybe if SpaceX hadn’t just destroyed a launch pad and the surrounding area I would be more sympathetic.
Space X was also very slow in getting the required report to the agency to review. Perhaps Space X should have done a better job there instead of rushing ahead to the next launch.
I’m sure Elon is willing to pay more taxes to fund this.
I want Elon to stay the fuck away from all of this. Let me like spaceships without feeling fucking gross about it.
As much as I agree with the sentiment, we both know that’s not going to happen. Let him pay for the privilege.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The SpaceX officials said they want to be clear that the FAA is doing a reasonably good job with the resources it has, and that everyone supports the mission of safe spaceflight.
However, they said, the FAA needs significantly more people working in its licensing department and should be encouraged to prioritize missions of national importance.
Inefficient regulation, the officials said, is decreasing American competitiveness as space programs in China and elsewhere around the world rise.
“Maybe the committee can give them the big picture goals of what they want to accomplish for the US, and then maybe the FAA can be a little more innovative in how they interpret some of the rules and regulations," a SpaceX official said.
During the hearing on Wednesday, Gerstenmaier will recommend that the FAA double the staff in the licensing division of its Office of Commercial Space Transportation, which is known as AST.
The company also believes that license applicants should be able to opt-in to help fund independent third-party technical support to assist the FAA surge in the near term while the agency goes through the hiring process.
The original article contains 557 words, the summary contains 186 words. Saved 67%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
Didn’t musk bail out of California because taxes?
Dude wants a tax-funded agency to pour work into his pet project and skip out on paying for it. What a freeloader.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The SpaceX officials said they want to be clear that the FAA is doing a reasonably good job with the resources it has, and that everyone supports the mission of safe spaceflight.
However, they said, the FAA needs significantly more people working in its licensing department and should be encouraged to prioritize missions of national importance.
Inefficient regulation, the officials said, is decreasing American competitiveness as space programs in China and elsewhere around the world rise.
“Maybe the committee can give them the big picture goals of what they want to accomplish for the US, and then maybe the FAA can be a little more innovative in how they interpret some of the rules and regulations," a SpaceX official said.
During the hearing on Wednesday, Gerstenmaier will recommend that the FAA double the staff in the licensing division of its Office of Commercial Space Transportation, which is known as AST.
The company also believes that license applicants should be able to opt-in to help fund independent third-party technical support to assist the FAA surge in the near term while the agency goes through the hiring process.
The original article contains 557 words, the summary contains 186 words. Saved 67%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
