US District Judge Tanya Chutkan on Friday temporarily froze the gag order she issued on Donald Trump in the former president’s federal 2020 election subversion criminal case.

  • Nougat
    link
    fedilink
    30
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Yet again, Trump does anything he wants with impunity.

    Edit: Wait, that gag order didn’t exact any consequences anyway. Putting it on hold is “We aren’t even allowed to tell him to stop doing whatever he wants.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2011 months ago

    to give the parties more time to brief her on the former president’s request to pause the order while his appeal of it plays out.

    • originalucifer
      link
      fedilink
      32
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      christ. its the guys whole schtick. appeal every ruling to the absolute stupidest level possible to delay.

      he’ll be dead before any of this matters

      • @logicbomb
        link
        1011 months ago

        I fucking hate to be put in this situation, but every single wealthy person in America would use the same tactic, not just Trump. In criminal cases, defense lawyers file as many relevant motions as the client can afford, because each one gives the judge a chance to issue a ruling, and each ruling represents one more possible chance for the judge to do something that could be appealed.

        It’s stupid, but it’s the best way for defense counsel to defend their client. It’s just a lot of billable work for a small chance of improved outcome, so it is a tactic that is only available to wealthy people.

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          English
          311 months ago

          somebody buy the man an unlimited lifetime supply of hamberders.

  • magnetosphere
    link
    fedilink
    1511 months ago

    I want to be mad at the system for endlessly coddling this man, but if I’m being honest, I should be mad at myself for expecting anything else.

  • fiat_lux
    link
    fedilink
    1111 months ago

    For roughly 1 week - which could have easily fit in CNN’s headline.

    • Prox
      link
      911 months ago

      Still too long.

      • fiat_lux
        link
        fedilink
        711 months ago

        I can’t fix a slow legal system, but I can actively undermine the strategy of omitting key information to boost ad revenue and user engagement metrics. It’s manipulative on CNN’s part, and fuck both CNN and Trump for manipulating information for private gain.

        • Prox
          link
          111 months ago

          Haha I was saying that 1 week is too long too freeze the gag order. I totally agree that CNN should have put the duration in the headline.

    • sik0fewl
      link
      fedilink
      111 months ago

      It would have ran right off the page! Blame the typesetters!

      • fiat_lux
        link
        fedilink
        211 months ago

        Nah, I hold Gutenberg personally responsible. I’m taking it right back to the source.