• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    731 year ago

    This demonstrates why open, federated, censorship resistant platforms are necessary for a healthy world wide population.

    Love them or hate them, voices silenced are voices oppressed.

    • @MrkawfeeOP
      link
      English
      51 year ago

      Yes it’s only a matter of time before Hasbara operatives try to suppress pro Palestinian voices on here. They’ve already taken over Reddit.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          281 year ago

          I believe, wholeheartedly, that governments pay people to astroturf reddit.

          They’ve gotten it down to a science at this point. Something I always notice now is people arguing against arguments that don’t exist. They’ll be like “I can’t believe people are saying x” when nobody is actually saying x.

          It’s that kind of manufactured outrage, the kind that makes people feel like they’re missing out, that causes them to pretend to understand what’s going on in order to fit in.

          It’s sad and disgusting, but I don’t even bother with reddit anymore. It’s too obvious that everyone there is either a shill or an idiot.

          Lemmy appears to have gotten all the high-quality posters that reddit used to be good for.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          My oldest reddit acount was around 12-13 years old when I moved here and let me tell you the shifts over time were noticeable and constant especially in the world news sub. Honestly looked like it was someones goal to turn it into what it looks like now.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            131 year ago

            Honestly looked like it was someones goal to turn it into what it looks like now.

            Ding ding ding. Moderators have only become less impartial as time went on with reddit.

            A public modlog is absolutely necessary to hold mods accountable, which is why reddit doesn’t have one and none of the mods advocate for it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              41 year ago

              Based on the drama around antiwork after the fox news spot I believe it. I’ve seen admins install mods into already moderated subreddits simply because they weren’t as reddit would like them, profitable.

        • InfiniteGlitch
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          I thought, it was just me thinking this/ noticing this. But majority of videos are posted by bots continuously and sometimes, it feels as if it is trying to stir up crap.

          Reddit is quite useless in general nowadays. Only reason why I’m on it is for the specific subreddits (which are unfortunately not yet here).

  • @fubo
    link
    English
    521 year ago

    You can’t be pro-Palestine if you’re not anti-Hamas.

    Remember, Netanyahu is pro-Hamas because he knows Hamas is bad for Palestinians.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      251 year ago

      Sadly this is turning into one of those “I support the troops, but I don’t support the war” moments. People just hear “pro-Palestinian people” and immediately think “omg, you support Hamas and terrorists!”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I dunno. This just seems like one of those stupid talking points that sounds clever on the surface but when you actually think about it, it’s dumb as hell.

      Like, are you really stupid enough to believe Hamas would sabotage any legitimate chance of getting Jews out of Israel because they prefer Gazans to be oppressed? Nah. They’d rather be in control of Israel.

      Unfortunately, the snowball effect has already taken hold, so those who can’t think for themselves will just parrot what you’re saying without second thought in order to fit in.

  • @atk007
    link
    English
    471 year ago

    Duh. This censoring is why antisemitic conspiracy theories take hold in the first place. I understand moderation, but if you flag any discussion that goes against mainstream narrative as extremist, all that is left is an echo chamber. It’s right out of 1984 playbook. I am wondering how long before Lemmy will be called an antisemitic platform for even posting news like that?

    • @steventhedev
      link
      English
      51 year ago

      @eyeonpalestine was removed after showing signs of the account being compromised. NBC

      • @sfgifz
        link
        English
        161 year ago

        These accounts were initially locked for security reasons after signs of compromise, and we’re working to make contact with the account owners to ensure they have access

        Why not make it read-only until they make contact with the owners. Seems like an awfully convinient excuse otherwise.

        • @steventhedev
          link
          English
          -41 year ago

          Facebook are pretty upfront about the reasons for taking down accounts. It’s possible before they were detected they managed to upload some stuff that would get the account banned right away.

          • @MotoAsh
            link
            English
            101 year ago

            Oh, so some guy posts CP to Twitter, Twitter removes the post and reinstates the guy entirely … but it’s tooootally not suspicious when FB nukes an account from orbit for “signs” of being compromised…

            Yea, no. I call BS.

            • @steventhedev
              link
              English
              -91 year ago

              X (formerly known as Twitter) is a different company than Facebook. They have different policies.

              Facebook tend to be upfront about the reasons they removed an account. And they’ll ignore any and all evidence to the contrary after they’ve made that decision. There was a guy who hit the HN frontpage this week because he can’t advertise his online courses on Python and Pandas. Apparently they thought he was trying to sell live animals instead of teaching people how to do data science.

              Twitter just does whatever Musk wants this week.

              • @MotoAsh
                link
                English
                5
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Way to miss the point. They’re pretending to be up front. The real reason is the censorship you’re so adamantly denying.

                • @steventhedev
                  link
                  English
                  -31 year ago

                  Perhaps you can calm down and wait for eyeonpalestine to actually publish a statement before jumping to conclusions?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    151 year ago

    Once you start making social media platforms legally liable for the contents of their users’ posts, this is what will always happen. E.g. this state of affairs appears to be the express purpose of Canadian law. I don’t know why anyone is surprised.

    If you want free speech, you have to stop punishing the courier who delivers messages you don’t like.

  • Ordoabchao
    link
    fedilink
    111 year ago

    I would have thought the answer to that was obvious? Of course they are.

    • bioemerl
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      The president has no business coordinating with social media on any issue.

    • @slumlordthanatos
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      The question before SCOTUS boils down to: “Is it against the First Amendment for the government to inform social media platforms that a post/account violates that platform’s TOS?”

      The Biden administration is explicitly NOT ordering these platforms to take down posts, but reporting them to mods, like any other user can.

  • @reddit_sux
    link
    English
    61 year ago

    Pro-palestine posts are anti-semetic don’t you./s

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      171 year ago

      Anyone else find it weird how it’s not okay to be anti-semetic, but it’s okay to be: anti-Chinese, anti-Russian, and anti-muslim?

      • @MotoAsh
        link
        English
        13
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Bigoted hypocrites seldom realize they’re bigoted or hypocrites. At least not in any meaningful way. There were a shitload of them before this attack. Why so surprised they all have the wrong opinion? It’s exactly what they always do: blame the victim.

        These are the people that ask, “well what was she wearing?” after someone gets SA’d…

      • @reddit_sux
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        You can be anti war crimes without being anti semetic, or anti Russian, or anti China. You can be anti terrorist without being anti Muslim. You needn’t be a bigot.

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      English
      341 year ago

      The civilians who are just trying to survive anyway they can.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 year ago

          Then we should have open platforms to be able to discuss the issues. And not have a third party censoring it to push forward an agenda

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -61 year ago

            And you’re looking at ad-pushers like google, facebook or tiktok to be these discussion platforms?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              61 year ago

              No, central control will always tens toward censorship. Open federated distributed platforms like Lemmy

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -251 year ago

    I don’t get it, how can we be pro-palestinian ? They are sending hundreds of missile every year since like 2005. Israel could have just gone in and raze the place to the ground but they just waited for years. I don’t think the war is good by any means but damn, someone came into your home, killed your friends and family and you’re not supposed to do a thing about it ? What am I missing here ?

    Like, would people be OK if we were protesting for alqaida right after 9/11 ? That’s just insensitive. I understand not all Palestinians are for the war but what is Israel supposed to do here ?

    • @atk007
      link
      English
      341 year ago

      I don’t think the war is good by any means but damn, someone came into your home, killed your friends and family and you’re not supposed to do a thing about it ? What am I missing here ?

      I think you just defined Palestinian position.

    • tables
      link
      fedilink
      161 year ago

      but they just waited for years

      Israel destroys Gaza tower housing AP and Al Jazeera offices - 2021

      Israel Bombs Hospital and UN Building - 2019

      ‘The world stands disgraced’ - Israeli shelling of school kills at least 15 - 2014

      You can Google for “Israel bombs”, limit the results to whatever range of years you want, and you’ll find plenty of these. Throughout the years there’s been areas of Gaza that haven’t even had time to rebuild before they’re being bombed again. Searching for “UN condems Israel” is another great one. It’s almost funny how many times a country can be condemned for war crimes by the UN without any actual repercussions against that countries’ government, as long as they’re “allies”. Is this what you call “waiting for years”?

    • @MrkawfeeOP
      link
      English
      131 year ago

      Israel has kept Palestinians in a concentration camp called Gaza since 2005. They control entry and exit in addition to electricity and water. Palestinians have been made refugees in their own country since 1948 and have watched white European settlers ethnically cleanse villages, raze farms and kill livestock while killing and imprisoning anyone who resisted. That’s not to mention the millions of refugees languishing abroad with no hope of return.

    • InfiniteGlitch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      When I see comments like yours, I have to double take to see if it is an troll comment or not.

      How can you not be for Palestinian people?

      • They have been driven out of their land since 1948
      • Been oppressed ever since being forced to leave their homeland
      • Been murdered, ridiculed, victimized ever since then
      • All country presidents seems to be okay with it

      How can someone even be for Israel government with all this knowledge?

      Certainly what Hamas did is wrong and I condemn it however if you are being oppressed for 70+ years, at one point, you’ll seriously lose it and fight back. Realize Hamas was made in 1987 to fight for Palestinian lives, if Israel didn’t just steal land, oppress Palestinian people and keep doing that for so long - Hamas might not even have existed.

      What Hamas did on 7 October, Israel have been doing that for decades upon decades to the Palestinian people and no one cared. Now it’s a country with lots of money, artillery and such - everyone cares all of a ‘sudden’.

        • tables
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          It’s why I happily soak up the downvotes all the time from the pro-Hamas crowd on here.

          The second part of this sentence is likely why you’re downvoted. The whole “everyone who disagress with me is pro-Hamas / anti-semitic” is tiring, disingenuous, shoves aside any possible good faith discussion, and I’d argue it’s actually destructive as it muddies the definition of these terms. Anti-semite specifically is a term I don’t think people should be throwing around willy nilly, but by this point, 99% of the time I see it used in online discourse it describes someone who doesn’t think mass civilian bombings are OK, and maybe 1% actual anti-semites. It’s basically the right wing version of some “leftists” calling people fascists for having the slightest right of center opinion.

          I usually either scroll past any mention of these or downvote and move on because it’s too tiring to devote time to people who, most of the time, are arguing in bad faith.

            • tables
              link
              fedilink
              41 year ago

              I get what you mean. My pet peeve is more with “real life” people. I don’t spend that much time on Lemmy anymore because, well, in a lot of ways it’s a lot like the worst parts of Reddit. And, in general, I’ve started to notice that “internet opinions” hardly ever represent what I see when I talk to real life people. So I tend to not care much about anything coming out of Lemmy, Reddit, Twitter, etc, as I find it’s often the loud very tiny minority.

              But I have the habit of reading opinion pieces on a couple of national newspapers, and I’ve noticed the “you’re an anti-semite if you disagree with me” pattern a lot. Most opinion pieces by usually left leaning political writers have been more level headed than I actually expected them to be - in the sense that there’s a couple of them who usually hold far more extreme positions on pretty much everything else and have been surprisingly “center” on this issue. Whereas on the right, a few people who I would say are usually fairly moderate and level headed have gone hard on the “the left actually hates jews, they don’t care about civilians” trope. And it’s very confusing to me because I have yet to find any actual left leaning person who’s any relevant in my country’s political scene actively sharing that discourse. So it all feels like baseless deflection. It was the kind of behavior I expected out of Reddit - it’s been the case for years I feel that in most bigger subreddits any critique of Israel’s government would immediately make you an honorary anti-semite. Though that seems to have changed a bit after we entered the “Bibi is trying to turn Israel into a dictatorship” arc and he’s not seen as the savior of Israel anymore. But it weirds me out to see these talking points coming out of real life political commentators who I would usually expect to be at least somewhat level headed. In general, with exceptions from the usual crazies and outside places like Twitter, I have yet to find the big leftist pro-Hamas discourse everyone seems to pretend is all around.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      If you’re saying crimes by some members of a population, condemn the entire population. That’s going to be a rough sell, is every citizen in Mexico responsible for the drug trafficker activity? Can we just start bombing Mexico, saying any collateral damages the responsibility of the drug traffickers?

      When looking at the power dynamics of a situation you have to look at who has more capabilities. In an apartheid situation where one population has unequal access to power, weapons, civic services, infrastructure, energy, water, human rights… you have to look at what is the systemic cause for the violence not just who’s committing the violence.

      When slaves rebel, it’s usually very bloody, and lots of non-slave owners get killed. The solution to that is not we’re going to triple down on slavery, it’s oh slavery is a terrible situation that causes lots of violence but it’s very nature.

      The fun thing is none of us have a direct hand in resolving the conflict, but we can identify the systemic issues that are causing the cyclic violence. So if a terrible thing happens, and then people respond with another terrible thing, and then people respond to that with another terrible thing, it’s the classic eye for an eye leaves the world blind.

      So let’s just think logically through these scenarios, either you have to come to peace with the oppressed population, deal with them fairly to end the violence… Or you have to kill every single one of them so that it doesn’t matter that they were being oppressed.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Lemmy in 1993:

      I don’t get it, how can we be pro-Irland ? They are sending hundreds of bombs every year since like 1968. The UK could have just gone in and raze the place to the ground but they just waited for years. I don’t think the war is good by any means but damn, someone came into your home, killed your friends and family and you’re not supposed to do a thing about it ? What am I missing here ?

      I understand not all irish are for the war but what is the UKl supposed to do here ?

    • CALIGVLA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You’re conflating Palestinian with Hamas. Hamas is an extremist group within the Palestinian population and no one in sane mind is on their side.

      I don’t think the war is good by any means but damn, someone came into your home, killed your friends and family and you’re not supposed to do a thing about it ? What am I missing here ?

      You’re certainly not supposed to go to the murderer’s neighborhood and kill everyone that lives there just because that’s where the culprit lives.

      I understand not all Palestinians are for the war but what is Israel supposed to do here ?

      Not indiscriminately kill civilians? Especially ones trying to cross the border for refuge or fleeing from bombardment? I’m not going to pretend it’s an easy situation, but the way they’ve been behaving the last couple of weeks almost seems purposely malicious, especially after that deranged speech at the UN council.

    • @DoomBot5
      link
      English
      -41 year ago

      Thousands of missles. Since Hamas’s invasion, they launched over 5000 rockets. That figure was from the first week.

        • @DoomBot5
          link
          English
          -11 year ago

          Hamas fires rockets all the time. In fact they did fire plenty of rockets right before and during their terrorist attack in Israel.