Brooklyn landlord Rafiqul Islam faces arson and attempted murder charges

  • @jordanlund
    link
    781 year ago

    Easier to deal with insurance than evict? 🤔

    • @GlitterInfection
      link
      English
      951 year ago

      The prison sentence might even be shorter than the eviction process would have been…

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      English
      51 year ago

      Insurance won’t pay- trying to claim your house that you intentionally torched is insurance fraud.

      • @jordanlund
        link
        31 year ago

        I think the idea was he thought he could get away with the arson, or that he could blame the tenants for the arson.

  • @x4740N
    link
    English
    781 year ago

    Eww fox news

    • Heresy_generator
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      But they only have the most business-relevant of all business news! Like this crime where the accused is not white! Very businessy; much finance.

  • @Burn_The_Right
    link
    52
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This never happened. Or did it?

    Fox News has testified in court multiple times that their “news” is not fact-based and that no reasonable person could confuse their stories as factual. So… It’s a fairly safe bet that this story is bullshit, based on Fox News’ own sworn statements.

    Fuck these Fox News affiliate links.

    • Hildegarde
      link
      -91 year ago

      No.

      Companies don’t make sweeping, damaging admissions in a court defense. No broadcaster would admit that all of their news is not news. They only make statements about the facts at issue. It’s a bad idea to admit anything beyond the scope of the case at issue. Anyone saying that a news agency admits they aren’t news has a bridge to sell.

      The arguments made by fox were that their pundit, Tucker Carlson made exaggerated statements during his punditry show. And the courts agreed that those false statements were not defamatory, because reasonable viewers would not expect a political pundit to be factual, because dishonest exaggeration is what political punditry is.

      MSNBC made very similar arguments in court. Rachel Maddow got a lawsuit from One America News Network dismissed under very similar circumstances. You don’t get factual information from pundits. Doesn’t matter what political leanings the network claims to have. Pundits are all liars, that’s what they do.

      Fox does awful journalism. You probably shouldn’t trust their reporting, but not because they admitted in court that their pundit did punditry before they fired him.

      • @Pretzilla
        link
        151 year ago

        Oof. Maddow and Faux are NOT two sides of the same coin.

        • Hildegarde
          link
          31 year ago

          They are both political pundits who work(ed) for advertisement funded national broadcasters. They both made statements in court that they do not make factual statements as a defense against defamation cases, both of which were winning arguments.

          They have a lot more in common than you would think.

          Fox and CNN and MSNBC will claim to be left or right wing. They do so to cater to specific audiences. But they are all funded by largely the same advertisers which have the same interests. Don’t trust any enormous media corporation.

      • @SoleInvictus
        link
        10
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You have accurately communicated the facts and I believe adherence to truth, even if you don’t like that truth, is the only way to be better than the typical OANN and Fox News crowd. I even found a corroborating article for the skeptics.

        https://thedispatch.com/article/fact-checking-a-claim-that-fox-news/

        When people disparage facts they don’t like based simply on the fact they don’t like them, they’re furthering a post-truth society.

  • @FerolisD
    link
    English
    23
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • @SalamendaciousOP
      link
      -71 year ago

      Personally I like reading from as many sources as possible. I like to compare biases. You’re obviously free to ignore whatever you want.

        • @SalamendaciousOP
          link
          -31 year ago

          I read Fox along with lots of other sources and I’ve found that by and large when it isn’t political Fox isn’t as horrible as you’re making it out.

    • Unaware7013
      link
      fedilink
      1011 year ago

      Hot take: people are more important than property, and anyone who thinks not paying for a basic human right is worth murdering over is a piece of shit who should be shunned from society.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -361 year ago

        Hotter take: Anyone should be allowed to set things they own on fire*. Being a landlord is thing here that should be outlawed.

        *Property fires cannot contain other people or their possessions. Fire must not spread to other properties.

        • @nutsack
          link
          20
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          that’s murder. you are advocating murder.

        • candyman337
          link
          fedilink
          391 year ago

          Are you saying that if you can’t make money you deserve to be homeless?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              I work in hospice and see all kinds of family situations. I see elderly parents that have to move in with their children because of medical and end of life care expenses, children who have to make decisions that will impact their current and future financial stability to care for their parents, and parents who’s children either can’t or won’t blow their futures to put the parents in a safe, clean facility.

              While I don’t wish any of those circumstances on you, I might imagine that should you find yourself there one day you might appreciate some compassion or empathy that you’re denying others.

            • Unaware7013
              link
              fedilink
              121 year ago

              I’m not sure what you’re saying, considering the person I replied to said the dude was right to try to murder a bunch of people, and I said property is not worth more than human life. I never said the world was free to live in, just that people who think that this behavior is acceptable over something that should be a human right are pieces of shit.

              What are you trying to say?

        • Neato
          link
          fedilink
          91 year ago

          It’s not but it should be because it can be.

    • @FireTower
      link
      711 year ago

      Dude arson endangers not just the lives of the residents of that building but those of adjacent buildings. Fires spread. Even if you could justify the death of the squatters arson is far from any justifiable mechanism.

      • @jopepa
        link
        221 year ago

        Everyone’s trying to explain the value of human life to this comment but you’re explaining the hazard to other objects. You’re reaching people where they are; I think just might change a heart tonight. Good job.

    • @s1ndr0m3
      link
      691 year ago

      Fuck landlords. They are leaches.

      • @dlpkl
        link
        -161 year ago

        And what does that make literal squatters lmfao

        • @HauntedCupcake
          link
          91 year ago

          It makes them impoverished and desperate in an economy that increasingly funnels wealth towards the idle rich

          • @dlpkl
            link
            -101 year ago

            Whew jumping to conclusions much? Did you imagine all that just to justify theft?

            • @orrk
              link
              101 year ago

              considering the rest of you guys are trying to justify murder, I think he has to do way less conclusion jumping

              • @dlpkl
                link
                -71 year ago

                The rest of who? Where did I even start to sympathize with the guy in the article. Y’all are streeeeetching

                • @orrk
                  link
                  71 year ago

                  your the guy trying to defend the person who is of the opinion that squatters are best dealt with by fire, if they stop providing rent income to the privileged

    • @TenthrowM
      link
      English
      671 year ago

      He tried to kill 6 children. What is wrong with you?

      • Kevnyon
        link
        fedilink
        -111 year ago

        And they had not paid rent since January? I will never understand the notion that some people, regular people, not billionaires, deserve to lose income while some people deserve free housing because of “family”. While he obviously went a bit overboard, I can’t imagine there wasn’t some desperation in his actions because he had not been paid rent for months on end.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          If they kept their rent the same, they would still get paid.

          But they were greedy, so they didn’t.

          They only have themselves to blame.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 year ago

      While I can try and understand your position. These people basically stole his investment. Arson and murder is not the correct solution.

      • snooggums
        link
        fedilink
        371 year ago

        Evicting them is the correct solution, and if that is too hard for him then maybe he is in the wrong business.