• @mlg
    link
    English
    201 year ago

    Danny Danon, a former Israeli ambassador to the UN, said Israel had a list of people it would “eliminate” for participating in the raid, and that journalists who recorded the assault would be “added to that list”. He added: “We will hunt them down together with the terrorists.”

    So from “we didn’t shoot that journalist with the giant press vest” to “anyone who reported the events will be killed”.

    • @NOT_RICK
      link
      English
      61 year ago

      Shouldn’t they be grateful that journalists were there to document Hamas’ war crimes?

  • Orbituary
    link
    13
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Passing the buck. Why would Israel’s security not have known?

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Four of the world’s biggest news organisations have vigorously denied any prior knowledge of Hamas’s deadly assault on Israel on 7 October, saying such a suggestion was untrue, outrageous and reckless.

    The Associated Press, Reuters, the New York Times and CNN issued robust statements in response to questions about Palestinian photographers in Gaza who documented Hamas’s cross-border raid in which at least 1,400 people were killed.

    Benny Gantz, a former defence minister who sits in Israel’s war cabinet, said on X, formerly Twitter: “Journalists found to have known about the massacre, and [who] still chose to stand as idle bystanders while children were slaughtered, are no different than terrorists and should be treated as such.”

    The AP and CNN said on Thursday they had severed ties with Hassan Eslaiah, a freelance photographer who took images of Hamas gunmen crossing the border.

    The US Republican senator Tom Cotton called on the justice department to investigate the media outlets in question, claiming without evidence that the journalists “almost certainly knew about the attack in advance”.

    Some of their atrocities were captured by Gaza-based photojournalists working for the Associated Press and Reuters news agencies, whose early morning presence at the breached border area raises serious ethical questions.”


    The original article contains 907 words, the summary contains 204 words. Saved 78%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -71 year ago

    As vigorous as Israels response was, and how locked n loaded it seemed, I wouldn’t be surprised to hear it was a false flag or US operation.