Interesting article about how HBO/Max is raising prices while it’s starting to lose customers. Can the number crunchers in finance and marketing at this channel (and others) find the right balance?

    • toasteecup
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Could be but I feel like we lack context. 700,000 is a number but large or small depends on what we’re comparing it to.

      Update: just read the article and no real numbers are given. I feel like that’s typical for wired? Not sure, but I don’t remember reading a wired article and ever saying “I feel confident enough to have a data based opinion regarding this subject”

        • toasteecup
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          That’s definitely fair, do you by chance have the total number of subscribers?

          • Ashyr@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            I don’t, but I’m not sure they’re releasing those numbers. The reason I assume a net loss is a quote from the article.

            Max’s subscribers have been “relatively flat” for nearly a year, and the service also lost subscribers in the quarter previous to this one.

    • buzzBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Removed by mod