Rep. Clay Higgins, R-La., during a Homeland Security Committee hearing on Wednesday accused the FBI of secret involvement in the January 6 attack. Higgins during the hearing with FBI Director Christopher Wray cited their exchange from a previous hearing. “I asked you, ‘Did you have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters positioned inside the Capitol on January 6, prior to the doors being open?’ You responded. I quote again, ‘I have to be very careful of what I say,’” Higgins recalled, arguing that “we can’t get a straight answer” despite a “tremendous amount of evidence.”

  • Ghostalmedia
    link
    English
    837 months ago

    How the hell does a nation even dig itself out of this disinformation / conspiracy theory rat hole?

    This shit is so depressing.

    • @hogunner
      link
      377 months ago

      Get money out of politics. Nothing will fundamentally change until we accomplish this.

      • @eran_morad
        link
        36 months ago

        I think this is the rather depressing truth.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      157 months ago

      For starters, stop treating these people as serious people, regardless of position or economic/political standing. This clowns and his kind should have their mics automatically cut off and all interviews immediately ended the moment they start bringing this shit up with any level of seriousness. We have to stop treating them as sane people with valuable opinions worthy of attention the moment they start spouting fucking reality denying nonsense like the mental patients they are.

    • @agent_flounder
      link
      English
      107 months ago

      I think it will have to be a long coordinated fight and grass roots involvement. There is a lot to fix.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    597 months ago

    He is nothing but an embarrassment to Louisiana. His FB page is filled with what sounds like drunken rantings.

    • @bostonbananarama
      link
      327 months ago

      Just a quick question, how would one go about embarrassing Louisiana? Seems like a tall order…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    207 months ago

    I often think House seats should be smaller, there used to be 33k people per district, now it’s over 700k.

    But fewer people per district would make for some idiosyncrasies and guys like this make me think we have enough weirdos in the House as is.

    • @kryptonianCodeMonkey
      link
      297 months ago

      A sizable reason for the current state of eccentric weirdos in the House is the Gerrymandering happening all over the place. Makes it way easier to win based on notoriety and the letter next to your name alone.

          • @QHC
            link
            47 months ago

            It’s harder and less effective with more districts, however.

          • @RestrictedAccount
            link
            37 months ago

            Fair enough, but there would be vanishing small returns because math.

    • TechyDad
      link
      117 months ago

      I think it would balance out because those idiots might be more numerous, but they would have less power. So maybe a few Representatives would be looney, but they wouldn’t be able to get much done against the even larger ranks of sane members.

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          English
          17 months ago

          and then you discover… all the other loonies that get elected, too.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      47 months ago

      I agree, but we’d have to restructure how the House does business.

      The current count of Representatives is 435. If we were to go back to old ratios at 30k, we’d have 11,300 Representatives.

      We’d have to break it up into smaller, constituent houses, or something.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        57 months ago

        If we went back to 210k people per Rep it’s about 1555. 210k is the ratio last time apportionment was done in 1912 or something like that.

        The math isn’t the point though. Republicans won’t budge regardless because any increase damages their inherent advantage.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      27 months ago

      Conservatives should love this, as it’s part of the Original plan right?

      Uncap the house. More reps = less power per rep.

      I will ALWAYS err on the side of diluting power. Always, All ways.

  • @Fades
    link
    177 months ago

    Fucking traitor and psycho

    • @eran_morad
      link
      26 months ago

      That’s like 99.9999999% of all repubs.

  • @Additional_Prune
    link
    167 months ago

    There are lots of these angry, stupid people. Some of them are at high levels of government–for example Clay Higgins. Democracy in the United States is in grave danger. Millions of Americans have abandoned reality and want bloody revenge on their perceived enemies.

  • Optional
    link
    117 months ago

    Christ, what a shitweasel

  • @son_named_bort
    link
    106 months ago

    🎶 Your recent lie

    Didn’t go your way

    Who you gonna blame?

    Ghost buses!🎶

  • @eran_morad
    link
    106 months ago

    Another republicunt trying to convince me that I’m the idiot. No, fuck you. I have eyes in my head and I am able to observe and accept physical reality. Fuck off and die.

    • Bakkoda
      link
      fedilink
      96 months ago

      “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”

  • @Nightwingdragon
    link
    English
    10
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    “I asked you, ‘Did you have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters positioned inside the Capitol on January 6, prior to the doors being open?’ You responded. I quote again, ‘I have to be very careful of what I say,’”

    I’m going to guess Higgins has never heard of the term “ongoing federal investigations”. If, for example, the feds are currently investigating the Proud Boys, Wray answering that question would put those investigations at risk and possibly risk exposing any undercover investigators that are on the case. Even his statement of “I have to be very careful of what I say” is all but an admission that at the very least, some kind of investigation is going on.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    67 months ago

    When you absolutely, positively have to have an insurrection on short notice, who you gonna call?