• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10311 months ago

    I think so far this is what people wanted: end the status quo and apply shock therapy.

    His supporters hope that in the long run the economy will become independent and the country would come out of the never ending crisis. My guess is that everything will simply end up owned by private interests and while (best case scenario) the economy will do better, people will suffer even more.

    • davel [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5911 months ago

      The Argentinian economy will not do better, only the wealth of the neocolonial compradors will, and the wealth of their Global North capitalist masters.

    • @sock
      link
      411 months ago

      ugh welcome to earth where the only way to have a healthy “economy” is for people to suffer. but we cant seem to just live in peace and help eachother out without monetary benefits. so people are forced to suffer because of greedy bastards.

      LETS GO WE NAILED IT GUYS

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      111 months ago

      They privatized many of the highways and you have to pass through toll booths every so often as ownership changes. These people provide no service, there are just taking the money. Same with much of the transit—many buses and trains are privately (mafia) owned.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      111 months ago

      Yeah, because Friedman’s free market shock doctrine shit just isn’t working.

      Free market regulating itself is the next bullshit argument

  • IWantToFuckSpez
    link
    fedilink
    9911 months ago

    He did say he would apply shock therapy to the economy. He never mentioned if the economy would come out alive.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7911 months ago

    This is just the price the poor are going to have to pay while the rich get to loot the country.

    • @sock
      link
      911 months ago

      “some of you may die, but thats a sacrifice im willing to make”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      311 months ago

      The poor are kept poor by being unable to even buy a pc… 200% import tax on electronics is the WORSE YOU CAN DO TO NORMAL PEOPLE.

    • @Ddhuud
      link
      -911 months ago

      Because inflation has absolutely no bearing on poor people’s silver linings.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    7611 months ago

    Who could’ve guessed that a rightwing government wouldn’t solve their issues (which were originally caused by rightwing policies)?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -211 months ago

      No, you are lying. Argentinas problems do not originate from right wing policies but from over protectionism

    • @Ddhuud
      link
      -2211 months ago

      which were originally caused by rightwing policies

      Such as…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1511 months ago

        The implosion of Argentina is a very complex issue, but, essentially, the country allowed itself to be informally dollarized and ceded control over most of its industries to international (read corporativist) interests. When Perón restructured the country, it was done with a limited scope and with relatively short term changes, causing their economy to collapse again later (it doesn’t help that Brazil, a powerful potential ally, had undergone a rightwing U.S.-backed coup at the time). Then, the whole Falklands/Malvinas war happened, all rightwing bullshit, and the country still hasn’t bounced back.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          611 months ago

          Don’t forget that every time a right-wing government get to power, they open up a new credit line with the IMF and leave the next government and the population on debt.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          111 months ago

          You just reminded me of an art display that went up in a park in Buenos Aires when I lived there. Basically the park is oriented around a fountain with a large circular area of brick around that, then pathways that go to the corners and sides of the square (ie to the sidewalks).

          They put up a series of walls in that outer circle that told the story of the Malvinas conflict. What stood out to me was that they referred to the UK not by any name or country reference, they were just called “The Enemy”.

          People remember and they don’t forgive.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Always take that sort of thing with a grain of salt. The UK is by no means innocent, but Argentina had no real claim to the Falklands - they were the invaders. Can’t really forgive others for a crime you committed.

  • @Plopp
    link
    3111 months ago

    If this keeps up I’ll have to stop shitting myself.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2611 months ago

    It’s beginning to look like Venezuela but with libertarians. It’s quicker than I thought.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1911 months ago

      Venezueal is a locked country that’s sanctioned to hell, Argentina is about to break incompetence records not ever seen before

      • @what_is_a_name
        link
        -611 months ago

        If you think that you are under 20 or have been living under a rock.

    • El Barto
      link
      11
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Hell no. For Argentina to look like Venezuela, inflation must be 100,000%. I wish I was exaggerating. 1 USD is 40 trillion of the old Venezuelan currency pre-Chavez, the one the government has cut 9 zeroes to hide inflation ever since.

      Of course, that doesn’t mean that the situation in Argentina isn’t looking dire.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      711 months ago

      Argentina isn’t sanctioned at all lmao. Thinking Venezuela is a failure is exactly what the US and its allies want you to think with the ridiculous amount of sanctions. Can’t have people see Socialism succeeding.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      011 months ago

      I lived in Argentina for five years. I’ve spent much time since then trying to convince people in the US that you have more rights and freedoms in Argentina. This might be changing now.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2511 months ago

    Who would’ve known, the man that made it so people can get their salary in jugs of milk is a complete idiot.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -211 months ago

      Not correct. He’s trying to undo fifteen years of lunatic tankies stealing money. The country is BANKRUPT. two times over. He’s doing his best. Even tho he has old fashioned dumb religious ideas, you do NOT know what one hundred percent inflation EACH YEAR FOR A DECADE does to people. Argentinians are now waiters in Mexico and Ecuador… They fled because of Kirchner making the country into a mud pool of corruption and freeloaders

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2011 months ago

    Look, theres a lot of reasons this guy sucks.

    Increasing the costs of two things that are causing the most damange to our planet is not a reason to criticize him tho.

    • @acosmichippo
      link
      English
      27
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      sure it is. removing subsidies on commodities like gas doesn’t change the demand for gas, it just puts more of a burden on poor people, and doesn’t matter at all to the rich who use it most. that path will only lead to backlash against green policies in general, see the yellow vest protests. in order to reduce consumption you actually need to reduce demand by giving people sustainable alternatives.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Demand elasticity is a thing. Demand won’t shrink by the same ratio prices rose after removing subsidies, but it will shrink.

        Response to that I can’t predict, but there are places in the planet where prices are lower because of the general poverty of population and the need to still sell it, and places where prices are even higher, but most of the population can’t afford fuel, I can’t name.

        EDIT: This was incomprehensible, sorry. I meant that in the long term prices for the consumer are going to become closer to what they were with subsidies, likely, thus the real prices - lower. The question is how bad it gets before that happens.

      • @Zippy
        link
        -111 months ago

        How the fuck do they afford subsidies? Why do you think they have been in this crisis for 30 years? It is a well educated and fairly modern society. But if you think socialist programs can be paid by borrowing money or printing money indefinitely and won’t result in cronic poor outcomes then you have little understanding of basic economics.

        • @Eldritch
          link
          English
          511 months ago

          The fact that you think subsidies are socialist says more about you than anyone else. And not in a good way.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2511 months ago

      This guy isn’t a climate activist. It’s funny to see the price of fuel going up with a climate denier.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      011 months ago

      Tankies love it.

      GASOLINE was soooooo cheap with subsidies. It needs to quadruple again, at the very least. REMINDER THEY DO NOT HAVE ANY CRUDE!

      Fifteen years of left wing policies printing money have left the place in literal SHAMBLES.

      The official exchange rate was half of the real one.

      That is NOW being FIXED.

      If you do NOT KNOW ANYTHING, SHUT UP PLEASE (this is meant for the other commenters, not you)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        011 months ago

        Finally someone that understands the real situation of my devastated homeland. Liberal or not (I don’t follow any political view, I hate them, I follow the common sense and empathy) this guy was the ONLY person with enough balls to change the devastating history and future of my loved country. I don’t know what’s going to happen, I not sure what this guy is going to do in the future, but at least he is doing something. To understand the level of crisis, that’s more than enough.

    • @Shardikprime
      link
      -1411 months ago

      I am not surprised that Lemmy is a cesspool of leftism

      • El Barto
        link
        211 months ago

        Then why are you here?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -2
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I don’t have problems with political views but This post is pure propaganda. Argentina is trying to get up after 100 years of fake socialism that set it to the disaster it is today in all gubernamental institutions

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    18
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    hopefully circumstances worsen quickly enough that it’ll be noticable for everybody so that the general public can clearly identify it as a direct consequence of this maniac being elected. If its deteriorating too slowly people might just not notice it as much and might go along with all the coming explanations ( probably immigrants, leftists, blahblah). If there’s a quick look into the abyss people might wake up and get into action.

    • @deafboy
      link
      1611 months ago

      “He also devalued the peso by 54 percent, putting the government’s exchange rate much closer to the market’s valuation.”

      It looks like the situation was worse all this time. The government just stopped pretending.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      411 months ago

      If there’s a quick look into the abyss people might wake up and get into action.

      And vote for the politicians that gave them slow decline again…

      • @orgrinrt
        link
        011 months ago

        Or, at any rate, someone else rather than this specific one giving them either the fast or the slow decline. At least there’s a chance, then, that people vote for something other than that.

        Regularly worse is still better than significantly worse.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          711 months ago

          The thing is, in weak democracies there’s rarely “someone else” that will fix things. Ukraine got super lucky with Zelensky but even he looked like a total crook when elected. Pretty much only populists can win elections in countries like that and it’s impossible to tell if the populist is saying populist things to get rich or to actually try fixing things. Most of the time they just want power and money and people that take the risk and vote for them have big chance of getting if more fucked.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      111 months ago

      This is the standard political cycle in Argentina, like a giant pendulum. Someone starts screaming about how they will fix everything and gets voted in. Their incompetence makes things worse and the cycle repeats with someone new.

  • @LufyCZ
    link
    1511 months ago

    Makes sense, if stuff is subsidized, the government has to pay for it. If the government doesn’t have money to pay for it, they’ll just print it out of thin air, devaluing the currency (and thus taxing the working class).

    There’s gonna be a lot of pain for Argentinians in the months and years to come, hopefully it’ll all be worth it…

      • davel [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5411 months ago

        It’s worth it for the capitalist class that is buying the country’s commons at fire sale prices.

      • @Ddhuud
        link
        -9
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        No, you’re right, let’s better keep our ruler class’ pockets full. That won’t bite us in the ass.

        • @Eldritch
          link
          English
          -211 months ago

          Then tax or seize their wealth. The loss of subsidies will specifically hurt the poorer much harder than the wealthy. The wealthy will just push their increased burden from loss of subsidies off onto the poor like they always do.

      • @LufyCZ
        link
        211 months ago

        Printing money is like borrowing it from the taxpayers.

        If there’s hyperinflation, it means that said loan isn’t being paid back, far from it actually.

          • @LufyCZ
            link
            311 months ago

            Of course it wouldn’t be there, I’m not saying that the government spending money at all is bad.

            What is bad is the government spending too much money, so much that they introduce way too much money into the economy, making the rest worthless.

            Obviously it’s a combination of factors, but printing (and then introducing) a shitton of money will have very direct effects on the value of the currency.

            • davel [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              From David Greaber’s and Michael Hudson’s work, I think I have a better understanding than most.

              Whether or not you need a government to manage money is neither here nor there. The specific monies that the US & Argentina specifically have are sovereign fiat monies, which are controlled by their governments.

      • @Eldritch
        link
        English
        111 months ago

        While I would definitely never recommend anyone to watch a second thought video essay. Seeing as they are an untrustworthy narrator. Who lies and misleads people. Especially around topics encompassed by their preferred ideology. This video at least is relatively safe. And straightforward. It’s just sad that they aren’t honest and objective enough that you could recommend them for people to watch in general. The video production quality is usually always decent enough even if the information isn’t.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1411 months ago

      That is not the idea that he had in mind when devaluing the currency. Instead of respecting the international money market exchange rates for USD to the Peso, he has unilaterally declared a new value which is about half of what it was before. The idea is to make Argentinian goods and labor competitive on the international market so the country can vacuum up huge sums of money from greedy investors.

      That idea is dumb though because investors tend to want some kind of political stability. They will not just say “Oh I can build my widget for 30% cheaper in Argentina because of this money woo” - they will say “Oh, Argentina will probably seize my assets if we invest there because they’re being run by a nutjob dictator.”

      • @LufyCZ
        link
        1311 months ago

        The black market rate was around 1000 pesos per dollar and the official was 400. They devalued it to bring it closer to the black market one.

        If the official rate meant anything, the black market one wouldn’t be so drastically different.

      • BraveSirZaphod
        link
        fedilink
        811 months ago

        Instead of respecting the international money market exchange rates for USD to the Peso

        You’re completely ignoring the black market Peso : USD conversion rate, which is even lower than what Millei has shifted things to at about 1000 pesos per dollar. The aim is to try to get the rate to actually reflect reality.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1211 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Mr. Galli has been trying to cut back without making life worse for his two daughters, who are 6 years and 18 months old, including switching to a cheaper brand of diapers and racing to spend his Argentine pesos before their value disintegrates even further.

    “I prefer to tell you the uncomfortable truth rather than a comfortable lie,” he said in his inaugural address, adding this past week that he wanted to end the country’s “model of decline.”

    The economic turmoil paved the way to the presidency for Mr. Milei, a political outsider who had spent years as an economist and television pundit railing against what he called corrupt politicians who destroyed the economy, often for personal gain.

    The previous leftist government had used complicated currency controls, consumer subsidies and other measures to inflate the peso’s official value and keep several key prices artificially low, including for gas, transportation and electricity.

    With the chronic high inflation, labor unions often negotiate large raises to try to keep up, yet those wage increases are quickly eaten up by sharp price hikes.

    “I always say that we are at university, and every day we sit for a difficult exam, every five minutes,” said Roberto Nicolás Ormeño, an owner of El Gauchito, a small empanada shop in downtown Buenos Aires.


    The original article contains 1,384 words, the summary contains 216 words. Saved 84%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      311 months ago

      For the better, since obviously the REAL EXCHANGE RATE was already around a thousand for a while.

      ALL HE DID WAS MAKE THE OFFICIAL AND UNOFFICIAL RATE MORE SIMILAR. so effectively making the illegal money changers obsolete! (and telling people to start buying food for next fw months and use the money changers to start saving in usd.

      THE PESO WAS ALREADY DEAD.

      ALL MILEI IS DOING IS PREPARING TO KILL IT COMPLETELY.

      I LIVE IN ECUADOR. WE USE SOLELY USD.

      NO INFLATION HERE!

      ARGENTINA HAS HUNDREDS OF PERCENT OF INFLATION EACH YEAR!!