• 1 Post
  • 228 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle

  • It sounds like you have been deeply hurt and I am sorry that happened. I am not the guy who did that to you or someone you care about.

    There are good men out there who would die to protect their children from other harms, are not predators and move society forward with a healthy contribution. I am one of those, not the other kind.

    In terms of building a better world, that sounds amazing. Until that job is done, it definitely falls to me at a minimum to keep my family safe, because for now the world still has real dangers and predators that can hurt them.



  • But I am different to a woman, specifically if there’s a violent threat or harm to the family.

    I will step in first to handle it, I’m more suited to it. I won’t be able to do it the other way around where I take the kids and run while the wife deals with whatever the threat is.

    Or a simpler example, if I get attacked, I do not want the wife to step in. However, if she is attacked, I will step in.

    Unless we’re limiting the discussion to exclude those situations?





  • ModvatoBlueskyDEI is Equity.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 months ago

    Why do you people think talking will help? You are so far past the point of honest discussion it’s mind-blowing.

    THERE IS NO EUREKA MOMENT COMING FROM RHETORIC.


  • Why would there have to be a point? It’s possible there is no architect and thus no point. It could all be random chaos colliding into this weird situation, and we’re just particles floating along in the maelstrom.

    To come the question of why should you care, well you can choose pleasures or pain in your time on this planet. Pain is the default if you make no choice.







  • You can thank the British people for that vote. No scapegoating. No playing the victim. Only the British people brought that into reality (helped some by their politicians, and foreign adversaries who have completely open and anonymous access to the social discourse)

    But it was the British who did it in the end, and fed directly into the enemy’s ideal of a less cohesive western world.