• 0 Posts
  • 14 Comments
Joined 1 年前
cake
Cake day: 2024年1月9日

help-circle








  • Just as an interesting “what if” scenario - a human making the effort to stylize Van Gogh is okay, and the problem with the AI model is that it can spit out endless results from endless sources.

    What if I made a robot and put the Van Gogh painting AI in it, never releasing in elsewhere. The robot can visualize countless iterations of the piece it wants to make but its only way share it is to actually paint it - much in the same way a human must do the same process.

    Does this scenario devalue human effort? Is it an acceptable use of AI? If so does that mean that the underlying issue with AI isn’t that it exists in the first place but that its distribution is what makes it devalue humanity?

    *This isn’t a “gotcha”, I just want a little discussion!





  • saplyngtoProgrammer Humor@programming.devGoogling
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 个月前

    While the generational diss train is fun and all I think it has more to do with design patterns of the most popular hardware at any given point.

    Now at this current state, unless you’re seeking out a desktop an individual is going to have most of their “technology time” on a phone which have been overwhelmingly been designed for simplicity and ease of use.

    When a barrier for entry and usability is low, it can be used by a wide range of people but that also means that most common operations are going to default to being fairly quick and easy. If the barrier to find “good” information is higher than the barrier for the entry point of the technology you’ll find most people settling for what’s probably “okay” information (even if that information isn’t actually correct)