seen this post elsewhere? click for explanation
This post got banned from [email protected] for reason “Troll Posting” which is Very Disrespectful in my opinion. 😕
I mean this meme with full respect and love to my fellow community members and I was proud of the discussion and support it was creating.
EDIT: POST RESTORED YAY. (Thank you to the mods it turned out to be a misunderstanding.)
Important clarification/FAQ
I am not calling to coddle or excuse the behavior of bigoted men in any way!
I am calling to be kind and understanding to young men (often ages 10-20) who are very manipulable and succeptible to the massive anti feminist propaganda machine. Hope this clarifies that very important distinction. :)
Very good comments that express key points:
- Detailed summary of the situation if you’re wondering what’s going on
- The rhetorical value of the bear hypothetical and what this means for you
- One example of why the long-term rhetorical value of the hypothetical is poor, in the context of intersectionality
- What does disenfranchisement mean in this context?
- The importance of not asking women to tone down their expressions of fear and frustration
- “But why can’t they just say it nicely?”
- The importance of participation in kindness toward young men, specifically outside the context of people speaking their experiences
spoiler
,
Oh not just “at this point” I’ve been busy figuring out what sticks with people vs. what doesn’t for at least two decades now. Points that, when prodded, don’t cause resistance, where some leverage can be applied that then may or may not avalanche into reevaluation of other topics which would be foolhardy to address directly. Dancing around the neuroses of the collective to enact my grand political vision of *checks notes* universal psychological health.
That all said yes of course we also have issues with gender roles. It’s just that in terms of who sits at the big power levers that’s not terribly relevant any more, it’s not 1850 any more the dam has long since been breached and as women can inherit fortunes nowadays the gender distribution of oligarchs is bound to level out soon enough.
spoiler
sdfsaf
Removed by mod
spoiler
sdfsaf
Yes, totally agree, we should all just stick to our initial assumptions and then rationalize them afterwards
spoiler
sdfsaf
Removed by mod
spoiler
sdfsaf
spoiler
sdfsaf
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
Here
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
That’s insightful, and I can see where you’re coming from, that behaviour is unfortunately very common, but I fear you’re applying that kind of logic too readily.
The guy you’re talking to is being sincere, and even partially agreeing with you. There’s just nuance being added to a conversation, and now you’re tacitly implying he’s far right?
He argues that maybe, social economic class is more important than gender when it comes to oligarchs. That’s not trolling the libs to incite a reaction. He might be wrong, but he’s not just trying to upset you.
Anyway, this is my last reply. I don’t see any point in further discussion