• Linus Torvalds, creator of Linux, does not believe in cryptocurrencies, calling them a vehicle for scams and a Ponzi scheme.
  • Torvalds was once rumored to be Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto, but he clarified it was a joke and denied owning a Bitcoin fortune.
  • Torvalds also dismissed the idea of technological singularity as a bedtime story for children, saying continuous exponential growth does not make sense.
    • @Lost_My_Mind
      link
      English
      317 months ago

      Well, we all know he beats his wife…

      …in monopoly! Give me those brown properties!!!

      • @Serinus
        link
        English
        27 months ago

        Why’s it gotta be the brown properties?

        • @Mercury
          link
          English
          27 months ago

          The man loves going to brown town, what’s wrong with that?

        • @Lost_My_Mind
          link
          English
          17 months ago

          They’re the cheapest to aquire, put hotels on, and they’re right at the start of the board. If you overshoot go, you’re PAYING $250 instead of recieving $200 if you land on baltic. And you, as the owner of the brown properties would either get $250 or $450 everytime.

          All for just $610 to buy both, and upgrade them both to hotels.

          • Kushan
            link
            English
            17 months ago

            Statistically, the best properties to have are the ones just after jail. Everyone who passes go still has to pass them, while those who get sent to jail also have I pass them. The organge properties are the best, because the average dice roll is 7 and from jail that lands you right on them.

    • @RizzRustbolt
      link
      English
      -57 months ago

      Healthy relationships have ridiculous hall-passes that share at least one person in common.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -297 months ago

      He’ll live long enough to end up on the wrong side of the polygamy rights fight. But I’d like to be surprised.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        427 months ago

        I imagine he will be an old and gray man and someone will ask him his opinion and it will probably be like

        What? Are you fucking with me? I didn’t give a shit what people did behind closed doors 40 years ago, what fuckin made you think I would care now? Are you fucking mental? Did your daddy not love you enough? Get the fuck out of here, your making my blood pressure spike…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        107 months ago

        Polygamy: Mormons, etc. generally opposes womens rights.

        Polyamory: Ideally places noone above another, elevates everyone to have the healthy connections such that noone is a “3rd wheel” or more disposable. Less about “polycules” recruiting new members, and more about individuals pairing with new partners, and existing partners (initially at least) gaining a metaphor. Mileage may vary and the point is everyone’s needs are a bit different and shouldnt feel pressured to fit neatly into a nuclear box.

        Just fyi.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        97 months ago

        Polyamory isn’t cheating though.

        Cheating is, by definition, sex with another person against your partner’s will.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Five guys and five gals will be arguing they have a right to share DNA amongst each other and make a single kid, giving them all parental rights. Religious right will have their scheduled stroke. Most of the population won’t care. Internet trolls will be screaming how it’s a United Nations plan to depopulate the planet.

          Or basically any legal recognition for polygamy.

          • @Syrc
            link
            English
            17 months ago

            Five guys and five gals will be arguing they have a right to share DNA amongst each other and make a single kid

            …Is that even possible? I thought humans could only have exactly two parents biologically? If I didn’t misunderstand, I’m legit curious about this.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              07 months ago

              We’ve already reached two lesbians with their combined dna being carried by a surrogate (which has extra dna effects as the carrier). With further dna advancements it should be possible to mix up multiple parents dna.

              • @Syrc
                link
                English
                17 months ago

                Is it this one? I’m far from an expert but it seems like they used a different part of DNA from each woman, I doubt it’s possible to go beyond 3 parents with the same method.