This brings the total under this administration to $167 Billion in relief for 4.75 million borrowers.

  • @goldenlocks
    link
    -36 months ago

    Who said i disagree with him?

    You claim to be against genocide several times on your account.

    And I also know that compromise is how things get accomplished.

    Your strategy has managed to move this country to the extreme right wing. Time to admit it doesn’t work and try something else.

    Go ahead and look through a history book and see how many times protest votes and not booting succeeded in actionable results.

    Oh the irony, you’re the one with reading to do. I’m building a movement to improve the country and it starts with support. You would be proudly shouting down civil rights protestors back in the day.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      36 months ago

      So…. You didn’t check to see how many times doing nothing has brought change.

      I’m still waiting.

      • @goldenlocks
        link
        -16 months ago

        You’re the one doing nothing, yes I went though history and checked, turns out not doing anything like you changes nothing. Your plan: vote dem and do nothing for 4 years. My plan: build a movement by supporting the Green party so we have an opposition forcing the Dems to give concessions.

        Hilarious.

        • @zeppo
          link
          English
          16 months ago

          The only way that could possibly effective is if it was paired with comprehensive voting reform in every state (well, every state that matters).

          A third party cannot win with the current first-past-the-post system. It’s so obvious that I can’t imagine why it would need to be explained. Have a good leftist candidate, it’ll take votes from the liberal. Popular conservative alt candidate, will take votes from the Republican. With our current roughly 50/50 balance, either one could result in the candidate with less support for their ideology winning. That’s how you end up with something like (theoretically) 25% Stein, 35% Biden, 40% Trump, and Trump wins because he had the plurality. Great.

          • @goldenlocks
            link
            16 months ago

            The only way that could possibly effective is if it was paired with comprehensive voting reform in every state (well, every state that matters).

            Yes, we’re working on that unlike the Dems.

            A third party cannot win with the current first-past-the-post system.

            Yeah they can, if you vote for them.

            That’s how you end up with something like (theoretically) 25% Stein, 35% Biden, 40% Trump, and Trump wins because he had the plurality. Great.

            RFK not exist?

            • @zeppo
              link
              English
              16 months ago

              If EVERYONE who would otherwise vote D voted for them, yes. That’s not going to happen, hence the scenario I gave which you quoted. Split the non-conservative vote between two parties, and the conservatives win - how is that going to help?

              • @goldenlocks
                link
                16 months ago

                Conservative vote is being split by libertarians and RFK, so it’s a great opportunity for the Green party. Notice how the spoiler argument is never used against the libertarians?

                • @zeppo
                  link
                  English
                  16 months ago

                  It is though. There have been 3rd party conservative spoilers too… it’s just that typically, it’s a Republican plot to fuck over Democrats.

                  • @goldenlocks
                    link
                    06 months ago

                    I’ve never seen it. It’s only Dems making the argument while ignoring the Libertarian party pulls far more Republican voters than the Green party pulls Democratic voters.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          16 months ago

          You’re going to…. “Build a movement.” Right. So, while you were checking on how much change was brought by doing nothing, did you come across the myriad people that “built movements?”

          Because that shit pretty much started back in the 60’s. And it took them until 1984 to even start the Green Party. And they’re been “building movements” since.

          So what exactly are you going to do differently than people more organized and smarter than you didn’t do over the past four decades?

          • @goldenlocks
            link
            -1
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            You’re going to…. “Build a movement.” Right. So, while you were checking on how much change was brought by doing nothing, did you come across the myriad people that “built movements?”

            Wow, someone actually arguing that historically movements did not start small, you’re a smart one /s.

            Because that shit pretty much started back in the 60’s. And it took them until 1984 to even start the Green Party. And they’re been “building movements” since.

            More than you’ve ever achieved in your life.

            So what exactly are you going to do differently than people more organized and smarter than you didn’t do over the past four decades?

            I use my skills in web development to help them out with several state party websites, and much more. So happy I have things to be proud of instead of being you.