• @cyd
    link
    English
    -6
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Reads like NIMBY propaganda. “Oh no muh construction dust.” Bitch you live in a desert…

    • @apfelwoiSchoppen
      link
      English
      374 months ago

      Put solar panels in parking lots and on buildings, where the humans live, not in fragile ecosystems. Deserts aren’t bereft of life, they are filled with some of the most resilient and charismatic flora and fauna known. Joshua trees and the Mojave have it bad enough already.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        274 months ago

        Honestly, solar panels above parking lots would rock. Shade for people in the parking lots, and power generation. Yet we don’t do it…

        • @MintyFresh
          link
          English
          9
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I want the term “parking desert” to take hold in place of parking lot. I hate most aspects of automobiles. The amount land we pave over for storage is just tragic and rude.

          We should build solar farms over our parking deserts to reduce human footprint.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            24 months ago

            I largely agree. I think we should have car-free city centers (delivery truck and transit only) with parking garages at the edges near transit hubs. But instead of that, we subsidize driving and encourage a car-centric society.

            • @MintyFresh
              link
              English
              2
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Yes! I’m into it. Just imagine the dope ass garden towns we could all be living in.

        • @not_that_guy05
          link
          English
          94 months ago

          We are in California. Here parking is starting to add shade with panels on top.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Cool. I’m in Utah and i’ve never seen parking lot solar panels, it’s all either roof mount or on the ground in a big field somewhere.

        • @dirthawker0
          link
          English
          64 months ago

          Kaiser, which is a major hmo here in California, has been putting solar panel parking shade in their lots. The community college in my town has it too. I can’t think of any downsides to them other than the installation cost. Everyone likes shade from sun and rain, and free electricity.

        • @[email protected]
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          04 months ago

          What are you on about? Who is we? This is an extraordinarily popular application of solar panels.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14 months ago

            I’ve never seen it. In my area, they’re all roof or ground mount, not suspended above parking lots.

            • @apfelwoiSchoppen
              link
              English
              14 months ago

              And even in places where it is happening, it is still extremely rare for a parking lot to have solar panels. Legislation is needed.

    • Hello_there
      link
      fedilink
      94 months ago

      Yes. Joshua trees and desert tortoises live in a desert. That’s the point.

    • @Brkdncr
      link
      English
      34 months ago

      “Construction dust that stirs up the fungus that causes valley fever…”

    • CrimeDadOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      There’s more to NIMBYism than saying “not in my back yard” in opposition to any development for any reason. A position isn’t meaningfully NIMBY unless it is in opposition to an arguably good development for bad reasons. For example, it is NIMBYism to oppose the construction of affordable housing because you don’t want to attract poor minorities to your neighborhood. In this case, a PV solar power plant might arguably be a good thing, but the reasons for opposing it, including the destruction of a rare ecosystem and a specific type of dangerous construction pollution, are more than fair.