I own a long dagger/short sword. The hilt is in the design of the German eagle with its wings spread out as the hand guard and in the middle of the hand guard is a swastika. The scabbard is also adorned with swastikas on the top, mid section, and bottom.

I don’t want to own this piece as I don’t want to be seen as a Nazi sympathizer or anything of the sort, but I don’t want to sell it to someone who actually is a Nazi sympathizer or something like that.

What do I do with it besides trash it? I don’t want to trash it because it’s decent quality. It’s not historic in any way (which disturbs me to think about) but it’s well made.

What can I do with it?

*The item in question is not historical

  • @Lost_My_Mind
    link
    16 months ago

    I know the gutteral instinct is to burn it, or melt it down. But I think you should donate it to your local history muesem. This applies for all war stuff you have, not just nazi stuff.

    I think its important for all generations to not be allowed to forget what did happen, and what could absolutely happen again if we forget.

    Sure, it’s “your” sword, but I just feel like it should serve a more important purpose.

    • Blyfh
      link
      36 months ago

      It’s not historic, though. If that were the case, I would’ve 100 % agreed.

      • @Lost_My_Mind
        link
        -16 months ago

        All war used uniforms/weapons/equipment I’d say is historic. Even if it was just a helmet used in the civil war, or a soldiers flask in WWI.

        It may not be individually a talking point for something historic, but it shows what they used at the time. Especially if you have multiple pieces from the same time period.

        And as time goes on, it gets more important. Because as time moves forward, and we have so many advancements in our world, this piece will not advance. Always a visualisation of its time.

        Right now I don’t think anyone would consider pieces from the afghanistan war to be “historic”, but the things we currently see as modern, will be relics in 100 years.

        We’re barely and I mean BARELY getting to that point of the Viet Nam war pieces seeming as relics.

        I think a good rule of thumb is “if the soldiers who would have used the item would have died of old age by now, THEN it’s a relic.”

        Which this certainly is. Which is why I think it should be in a glass case, with a little description on its history.

        • Rhynoplaz
          link
          16 months ago

          You misunderstand. OP mentioned in a reply that it’s a replica made post Y2K.

          So, no, it’s not historic. It’s neo nazi shit.

          • @Lost_My_Mind
            link
            16 months ago

            Oh. Ok, no. I take back everything then. I thought is was war used.

            Thats my mistake.