The key problem is that copyright infringement by a private individual is regarded by the court as something so serious that it negates the right to privacy. It’s a sign of the twisted values that copyright has succeeded on imposing on many legal systems. It equates the mere copying of a digital file with serious crimes that merit a prison sentence, an evident absurdity.

This is a good example of how copyright’s continuing obsession with ownership and control of digital material is warping the entire legal system in the EU. What was supposed to be simply a fair way of rewarding creators has resulted in a monstrous system of routine government surveillance carried out on hundreds of millions of innocent people just in case they copy a digital file.

  • @AdrianTheFrog
    link
    English
    713 days ago

    My ideal copyright would be 15 years or death of the creator or the end of sale/support, whichever is earlier. That would mean that Portal 2 has copyright and Portal doesn’t, which sounds about right.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        813 days ago

        So Disney and Nintendo can keep doing what they are doing but also the same companies can steal the work of smaller artists almost immediately?

        No thanks.

        • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
          link
          English
          213 days ago

          So Disney and Nintendo can keep doing what they are doing

          After 30 years not even Disney or Nintendo will pay a billion for exclusivity.

          but also the same companies can steal the work of smaller artists almost immediately?

          Let’s make copyright non-transferable. For a company to retain copyright it must employ the creator.

          • @Sanctus
            cake
            link
            English
            313 days ago

            After 30 years not even Disney or Nintendo will pay a billion for exclusivity.

            In October 2012, Disney acquired Lucasfilm for $4.05 billion.

            • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
              link
              English
              312 days ago

              To keep episode IV in copyright would cost $2^47 = $141.737 trillion

      • @Soggy
        link
        English
        513 days ago

        Nah. I’d even call 15 years too long.

        • @angrystego
          link
          English
          212 days ago

          You don’t pay a plumber every single time you use his work 15 yrs after his death.

        • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          To retain copyright:-

          $2^n for year n

          $1 for year 1

          $2 for year 2

          $4 for year 3

          $1k for year 10

          $32k for year 15

          $1m for year 20

          $1bn for year 30

          • @Soggy
            link
            English
            713 days ago

            Why, though? It still pointlessly favors people who already have money. Just get rid of it.

            • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
              link
              English
              113 days ago

              Ok, let’s say the copyright retention fee is only paid when it’s above 1k, I.e. after 10 years.

              • @Soggy
                link
                English
                413 days ago

                You are desperate to give rich fucks an avenue to maintain an advantage over everyone else.

                • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
                  link
                  English
                  3
                  edit-2
                  12 days ago

                  No. I want to give small creators a tool to stop their work being stolen in the short term.

                  But I also want to force copyright monopolists to pay ever increasing tax on the property they hold that should really be in the public domain.

                  My proposal also means orphan works no longer exist.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        113 days ago

        Like, maybe tiered to something like 5 years: pay what it costs now, 10 years: 10 times that cost, and 15 years: 100 times, with a hard cap at 15? I could get behind that.

        • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
          link
          English
          213 days ago

          Yeah. Something like that. Maybe don’t even need a cap.

          If you pay $2^n each year n to retain copyright then by year 30 you are into the billions.

        • @kryptonite
          link
          English
          212 days ago

          5 years: pay what it costs now

          It doesn’t cost anything to copyright something. You just automatically own the copyright to something you create.

          (This may vary outside the US; I’m not familiar with international copyright law.)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            112 days ago

            I thought there was a registration fee for copyright, but I think I mixed it up with trademark…