• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    115 months ago

    That’s why 60% of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck! All they have to do is invest the pennies they have left over! Crazy how a group of people that motherfucking huge aren’t just pulling themselves up by their bootstraps!

    • MacN'Cheezus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -155 months ago

      I think the moral of that story is that you should at least make a bare minimum effort in order to justify your existence. The Parable of the Wedding feast has a very similar lean: there, a guy gets thrown out of the wedding (after having been invited for free because the original guests wouldn’t come) because he wouldn’t even dress up for it.

      The point is, there ARE examples of Jesus cutting people off because they’re not worth his continued investment in them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Correct me if I’m wrong, but your point sounds like, “[The god of my religion] does not find your existence is worth enough to help, therefore, the United States Government is not obligated to change a system where 60% of it’s citizens are not financially stable.”

        • MacN'Cheezus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -45 months ago

          Correct me if I’m wrong, but your point sounds like “the God of YOUR religion better not be telling the God of MY religion what to do.”

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            6
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Yes, you are wrong. When it comes to the USA, NO religion should dictate governmental decisions. Whether it is yours or somebody else’s.

            • MacN'Cheezus
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -55 months ago

              Right, which implies that the God of your religion is the state, because that’s who you want to give supreme authority to.

      • @Shardikprime
        link
        2
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        What?

        I just want to point out that in the wedding illustration, that guy who gets thrown out it’s not because he didn’t put an effort dressing

        He was thrown out because he he could not have got inside the building without the wedding garment

        So he shouldn’t be there

        That’s why they thrown him out

        Because he was not recognized as being one of the invited AND chosen in any of the 3 rounds of invites that went out , the dude had to go.

        The whole deal is basically telling people at the time that each rejected invitation made you part of his enemies, and even then if you tried to pass as if you had been invited and chosen, you’d be found out

        • MacN'Cheezus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          05 months ago

          Okay but it still roughly fits the situation in the OP, doesn’t it? He got thrown out because he wasn’t producing the expected result (i.e. being a proper wedding guest).

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            All guests were given the garment for free.

            So maybe he thought his own garment was better than the one provided by the host, which it wasn’t.

            • MacN'Cheezus
              link
              fedilink
              English
              25 months ago

              All guests were given the garment for free.

              Where does it say that?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                35 months ago

                You’re right, I must have misremembered that. I totally thought that it was explicitly stated in this parable.

          • @Shardikprime
            link
            -15 months ago

            Nah, it’s because he wasn’t even supposed to be there. He was not chosen

            • MacN'Cheezus
              link
              fedilink
              English
              05 months ago

              Okay, then perhaps the guy in the OPs meme wasn’t chosen either

              • @Shardikprime
                link
                -15 months ago

                Probably, I don’t understand the meme at all

                • MacN'Cheezus
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  15 months ago

                  The meme is attempting to caricature Conservative’s idea of Jesus by alleging that the biblical Jesus would never put profit over people. But as the parables I mentioned show, that is in fact inaccurate and thus promotes a liberal caricature of Jesus who feeds people endlessly without ever asking for anything in return.