• @disguy_ovahea
    link
    403 months ago

    English is weird. It can be understood through tough thorough thought, though.

    • @samus12345
      link
      English
      173 months ago

      How many ways can “ough” be pronounced in English?

      through - oo

      tough - uff

      though - oh

      thought - ah

      cough - off

      bough - ow

      Any others?

      • Zagorath
        link
        fedilink
        English
        133 months ago

        thought - ah

        ?

        thought - or; if you pronounce it the UK/Aus/NZ way

        thought - o; if you pronounce it with a general American accent

        As for others:

        • thorough - uh (schwa)
        • hiccough - up
        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          123 months ago

          Would phoneticizing it as “aw” help? American English pronounces “thought” as if you added a t to ‘thaw’

          Saying it’s “o” makes it sound like you mean it to be pronounced “oh”

          • Zagorath
            link
            fedilink
            English
            5
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            As far as Latin alphabet approximates, I’d say “aw” is pretty perfect. Because I think most accents will pronounce “thought” as if you add a t to “thaw”. It’s just that what that means in terms of the actual articulation varies a lot.

            So, Americans with the cot-caught merger will pronounce it with the “cot” vowel, which is what I was trying to get across. UK/Aus/NZ don’t all pronounce it the same as each other, but do for the most part pronounce it with the same vowel as they would use for the word “or”. And “thaw”, in our non-rhotic accents, is the same as Thor.

            So “aw” works either way. Nice find!

            • Jojo, Lady of the West
              link
              fedilink
              13 months ago

              Pretty sure “caught” won and “cot” lost in the caught-cot merger. I don’t think most Americans would conceive of it as an “o” sound

              • Zagorath
                link
                fedilink
                English
                23 months ago

                When I hear an American with the caught/cot merger say “caught”, it sounds way more similar to my (unmerged) “cot” than my “caught”

                • Jojo, Lady of the West
                  link
                  fedilink
                  23 months ago

                  I believe you. I meant more that it “won” conceptually than phonetically. To an American ear it sounds more like “aw” or “ah” than “o”.

                  • Zagorath
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    13 months ago

                    Oh yeah, maybe. I don’t really know how you’d measure that.

        • @samus12345
          link
          English
          43 months ago

          I’m referring to American English specifically. “o” would make me think it’s pronounced “thoat”, but it’s the sound I meant.

          “thorough” rhymes with “oh” in Standard American English.

          “Hiccough” is a good one. I always hated that spelling and prefer “hiccup” for that reason.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            33 months ago

            “Hiccough” is a good one. I always hated that spelling and prefer “hiccup” for that reason.

            TIL those are both pronounced the same way. (Gaol/jail is worse, though.)

          • Zagorath
            link
            fedilink
            English
            03 months ago

            Yeah o on its own is definitely unclear. I meant o as in “cot”. (As in the American cot-caught merger.)

            I feel “ah” would be a better shorthand for the vowel in “palm” or “bra”, or “car” in non-rhotic accents.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      53 months ago

      Yes, English is weird, but this word still breaks rules. “Gh” (pronounced “f”) is never at the beginning of a word, and “ti” (pronounced “sh”) is never at the end.

      • @disguy_ovahea
        link
        43 months ago

        Oh, you’re absolutely correct. I think it’s just meant to poke fun at the complexity of the language.