• @AbidanYre
    link
    English
    137 days ago

    40MHz is plenty for doom.

    • 𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚐
      link
      English
      8
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      40MHz is plenty for doom.

      Ew, no. Even 386DX-40 is terrible for Doom:

      Doom timedemo 386 DX 40 MHz DOS PC

      486SX-33 is certainly playable, but you really want 486DX2/66:

      Doom Timedemo - 486DX2/66MHz

      Edit: grammar

      Edit 2: These videos are accurate, btw. I upgraded from 386SX-25 to 486SX-33 just for Doom while my friend got the 486DX2/66 Packard Bell. Envy.

      Edit 3: My memory forced me to go back and properly designate the models.

      • MacN'Cheezus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26 days ago

        Can confirm. My dad had a 386DX-40 when I got my hands on a copy of Doom, and it was a fucking slideshow at best.

      • @AbidanYre
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        I had a 386sx@25MHz too and I don’t remember it being that slow. Unless that demo has the detail cranked up to high or something like that. Although, like that first commenter I had a math co-processor, so maybe that helped.

        Or maybe my memory is off and I made the window tiny.

        • 𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚐
          link
          English
          2
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Are you sure you didn’t set low-detail with the viewport cranked way down? I played it on the same model with a math co-processor and it could not handle high-detail and the large viewport in the video.

          Edit: I’m fairly certain I had a math co-processor, but I’ll defer to you on this detail just in case. That would certainly make a sizeable difference.

          • @AbidanYre
            link
            English
            26 days ago

            I think the detail level made a pretty big difference. I definitely ran it in low and kind of forgot that high was an option, but the shotgun animation in that video is bringing up some traumatic memories.