• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    73 months ago

    I don’t agree with you but either way that doesn’t change the fact that nuclear is just slow, expensive and a bad idea in 2024.

    • @PunnyName
      link
      33 months ago

      How is nuclear a bad idea? It’s one of the best options. Sure it’s slow and expensive, but once it’s up and running, it’s safe, and even less radioactive than coal.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        53 months ago

        Because solar and wind can be deployed much faster. You rather easily have a decade of extra coal or gas emissions, if you built nuclear today.

        • @PunnyName
          link
          33 months ago

          Two things can be built at once.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            33 months ago

            Sure, but why would you built a nuclear power plant, when you are faster in having a clean grid with wind and solar. The workers building the npp could built more wind and solar after all.

            • @PunnyName
              link
              -13 months ago

              So just do both at the same time.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            No. The total amount of money available for energy research and construction is a given amount. If it’s better spent on solar and wind that’s it.