Darryl Anderson was drunk behind the wheel of his Audi SUV, had his accelerator pressed to the floor and was barreling toward a car ahead of him when he snapped a photo of his speedometer. The picture showed a car in the foreground, a collision warning light on his dashboard and a speed of 141 mph (227 kph).

An instant later, he slammed into the car in the photo. The driver, Shalorna Warner, was not seriously injured but her 8-month-old son and her sister were killed instantly, authorities said. Evidence showed Anderson never braked.

Anderson, 38, was sentenced Tuesday to 17 years in prison for the May 31 crash in northern England that killed little Zackary Blades and Karlene Warner. Anderson pleaded guilty last week in Durham Crown Court to two counts of causing death by dangerous driving.

  • @FireRetardant
    link
    English
    29
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    At a certain point we need to prioritize people’s safety over “vroom vroom”. 200+ km/h is nearly double highway speeds. Children dying from speeding crashes should be much more important than somebodys ego and desire to speed.

    • Admiral Patrick
      link
      fedilink
      English
      465 months ago

      If children dying from mass shootings isn’t enough to move these obstructionist-types, then nothing is.

      • @jpreston2005
        link
        English
        275 months ago

        When Sandy Hook happened and we didn’t even get universal background checks, I saw conservatives plainly that day.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -335 months ago

        Guns have useful legal purposes and specific constitutional protections though. Cars don’t. The number of people going track racing in their SUVs has to be essentially zero.

        • @demonsword
          link
          English
          115 months ago

          Guns have useful legal purposes

          Weapons are tools with only one utility, kill people.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -2
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Killing people isn’t always illegal, and you forgot hunting, euthanasia, and target shooting.

            • Flying SquidM
              link
              English
              15 months ago

              euthanasia

              Who exactly is euthanizing people with a gun? And why aren’t they using a less painful method?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                15 months ago

                If a horse or cow breaks its leg, what’s a less painful method? A properly-aimed bullet is instant and 100% painless. You gonna call a vet, wait half a day if you’re lucky, and then hope they give chemicals quickly and correctly while the animal languishs in pain?

                • Flying SquidM
                  link
                  English
                  05 months ago

                  Settle down there, Governor Noem.

          • @crank0271
            link
            English
            35 months ago

            These rights are enshrined in the Magna Car-ta

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      95 months ago

      As a driving enthusiast even I agree with this.

      However, people will just work around any limiters that get set like we already do.

      Many cars and motorcycles already have speed limiters—often 130-150mph.

      • @FireRetardant
        link
        English
        15 months ago

        Big fines, impound, jail time for people caught bypassing their limiters.

        • skulblaka
          link
          fedilink
          English
          65 months ago

          As far as I know that’s already the case.

          But nobody is going to know about it except you and (optionally) whoever you hired to do it if not yourself, so you’re only getting fined/arrested for it after you’re caught going 180mph.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 months ago

          yeah, be hard on crime! (sarcasm)

          I’m just meming—i don’t have a solution. other than maybe if people like me had a good outlet to enjoy what we love.

      • @FireRetardant
        link
        English
        25 months ago

        There are some 110 km/h hwys near me. The average speed seems to be 130 km/hr and cops don’t seem to mind until you go faster than that. 20 over seems “acceptable” near me, even in school zones marked 40 km/hr.

      • Spraynard Kruger
        link
        English
        2
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        There’s one around the White Mountains in NH that I have driven on that was 75 mph, but that is the absolute fastest I have ever seen. The same highway (I think) stayed 75 mph through the Green Mountains in VT too. Both areas are rural without a ton of drivers outside of peak tourism season, and about a 0% chance of hitting a pedestrian.

        Definitely a chance of hitting a moose and totally fucking up it’s legs, ending your own life in the process. Motherfuckers have been known to walk away from many car accidents without much more than a limp. They’re tall enough where they roll over most cars and even many pickup trucks when full grown.

        EDIT: Nevermind. It was I-93, which has a speed of 70 mph in the section that I drove on and I couldn’t find a 70 mph speed limit sign on that highway in VT, because it ends quickly after entering VT. Couldn’t be bothered to find where the VT highway was though.

        70 MPH on I-93 in NH

      • morriscox
        link
        English
        15 months ago

        Southern Utah has 80 MPH between Cedar City and Washington City (by St. George).