The tech mogul’s platform is the first to get hit with charges under new EU social media law.

The European Union is calling Elon Musk to order over how he turned social media site X into a haven for disinformation and illegal content.

The EU Commission on Friday formally charged X for failing to respect EU social media law. The platform could face a sweeping multi-million euro fine in a pioneering case under the bloc’s new Digital Services Act (DSA), a law to clamp down on toxic and illegal online content and algorithms.

Musk’s X has been in Brussels’ crosshairs ever since the billionaire took over the company, formerly known as Twitter, in 2022. X has been accused of letting disinformation and illegal hate speech run wild, roll out misleading authentication features and blocking external researchers from tools to scrutinize how malicious content on the platforms spreads.

The European Commission oversees X and two dozens of the world’s largest online platforms including Facebook, YouTube and others. The EU executive’s probe into Musk’s firm opened in December 2023 and was the first formal investigation. Friday’s charges are the first-ever under the DSA.

Infringements of the DSA could lead to fines of up to 6 percent of a X’s global revenue.

  • @snekerpimp
    link
    English
    232 months ago

    Is 6% of global revenue enough? Or is that just a foot note in the books on the cost of doing business?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s 6% of revenue, not profit. So it cuts even more into profits as it doesn’t allow a company in breach of regulations to reduce the impact of the fine by adding expenses that will temporarily lower their profit.

      Even more spicy, they can also impose periodic penalties up to 5% of the average daily worldwide turnover for each day of delay in complying. That shit can bankrupt you.

      • @vxx
        link
        English
        29
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        6% of profit would mean that EU owes twitter money.

      • @brucethemoose
        link
        English
        16
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Or Musk could pull Twitter out of the EU.

        That would be so wonderful. The EU economy would probably take off just from the saved time/brainpower, lol.

      • @snekerpimp
        link
        English
        82 months ago

        Thank you for showing me the teeth behind this ruling. If non-compliance carries harsher consequences, it may be enough

    • @Bassman1805
      link
      English
      182 months ago

      That could realistically be around 1/3 yearly profit in a reasonable company (18% operating margin is common). No idea whether Twitter is currently profitable (it wasn’t when he bought it).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        172 months ago

        An example could be AliExpress, with a 130B in revenue and 11B in profit (2023), it would reduce their profit to 3.2B with the 6% fine. That’s a whopping 70% less profits, and cutting expenses isn’t gonna fix it either.

      • @snekerpimp
        link
        English
        62 months ago

        Question still stands, is it enough?

        • @Fedizen
          link
          English
          82 months ago

          yeah it seems big enough that it might be cheaper to hire moderators

        • @WEFshill202
          link
          English
          52 months ago

          I mean that seems reasonably punishing yeah, not nearly the hours worth of profit usually charged to companies breaking the law. I believe the EU can even enforce its own content moderation on the site and charge the costs of that to Musk so its pointless for a company to not follow the laws at that point …

          • @snekerpimp
            link
            English
            12 months ago

            Musk will buy a company and tank it for the memes. I don’t think a warning shot like this will sway his decisions on the direction of said company. The people making the decisions aren’t culpable, the company is. The people making the decisions will just leave to a different company and we can start the whole process over again.

            I hope it’s enough and I sound like a bitter old man.

            • @nomous
              link
              English
              42 months ago

              Then he can tank it for the memes. Do that to enough companies and the “weird genius techbro” mask starts slipping and the venture capitalists no longer want to bankroll you and you start being seen as a liability.

              • @snekerpimp
                link
                English
                32 months ago

                God that would be great to see, what a temper tantrum that would be.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Historically, no, because companies still misbehave, the fines aren’t high enough for them to not try and see whether they get away with stuff.

          OTOH, historically, yes, because once fines come flying companies shape up.

          That is, they’re willing to gamble on that initial fine, but absolutely won’t tank the recurring fines for continued infringement.