Thomas Matthew Crooks, the suspectin Saturday’s shooting, was registered as a Republican voter, according to Pennsylvania records.

Already the republicans are dismissing his voter registration as meaningless. Here comes the “mental illness” angle.

Edit: apparently it’s not uncommon to register with the party you oppose in PA. This is going to be a fun ride.

  • @dhork
    link
    English
    25
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    If law enforcement sees a guy on a rooftop with a gun threatening a crowd of people, though, that’s an acceptable situation for “shoot first, ask questions later”. That shot that killed the guy probably saved other lives.

    • @ABCDE
      link
      -502 months ago

      Non-lethal shots are a possibility.

      • NoIWontPickAName
        link
        fedilink
        372 months ago

        They also allow people to keep shooting.

        That is some Hollywood shit, in real life you shoot until the threat is neutralized, it could have been another las vegas

        • @ZoopZeZoop
          link
          142 months ago

          Yes, one of the rules of gun safety is that you don’t point your gun at anything you don’t intend to kill.

        • @ABCDE
          link
          12 months ago

          They usually don’t. See: Europe.

          • NoIWontPickAName
            link
            fedilink
            12 months ago

            Ok, well you feel free to try and wound someone in that situation if you’re ever in it, hopefully no one else dies because of it.

      • teft
        link
        252 months ago

        No one in the history of actual combat shooting is taught to take non lethal shots. Ever.

        • @Mog_fanatic
          link
          132 months ago

          Idk what your talking about. You shoot the gun out of the hand. Then you shoot the hat off for intimidation and the somewhere nearby you shoot the rope of someone getting hanged to free them to kinda balance things out. This is all common sense.

          • teft
            link
            9
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I cannot argue with your rootin’ tootin’ shootin’ logic.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 months ago

          What do you mean with combat shooting? Because here in Finland police is trained to (and required by law) to try to minimize the damage and if possible, to stop someone without killing them, usually by shooting at the legs etc. But that’s more for knife fielding attacker and other situation where such shots are more possible and not when the cops or others are being shot at

          • teft
            link
            12 months ago

            I mean US military and police training.

            • @ABCDE
              link
              02 months ago

              This isn’t the military. You said no one, which is not true.

        • @ABCDE
          link
          02 months ago

          Combat shooting? It’s not a warzone. Come to Europe, mate.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          02 months ago

          There was an era where some cops were trained to shoot at limbs but even cops knew to ignore that shit.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            It’s the normal procedure here in Finland to try to take someone down with shooting in the legs or somewhere else that they might survive from. Not the case if they start shooting of course, it’s more for situation where they’re wielding a knife and coming for the cop or someone else

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        202 months ago

        Non-lethal shots are a fantasy.

        You have plenty of blood vessels in your limbs and it is very easy to bleed out via the femoral artery or whatever else. This is literally why tourniquets exist

        Assuming it is an actual threat and not a black kid with a toy train: Shoot to kill and then, when it is safe, have EMTs try to keep them alive.

        • @ABCDE
          link
          -32 months ago

          Not in the real world they’re not.

      • @dhork
        link
        English
        32 months ago

        If you’re standing 20 feet in front of the guy, yes. If your only shot is across a field from one rooftop to another, you have much less control over where the bullet hits.

        • teft
          link
          9
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          At those distances (200-300 meters going by the map i saw) with professional shooters they can put multiple rounds inside of a spot the size of a dime. That isn’t the point though, you shoot to kill in those situations. Non lethal shots are hollywood shit.

          • @ABCDE
            link
            02 months ago

            Or what happens in places outside of the US.

        • @ABCDE
          link
          12 months ago

          Is that what happened?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        They’re less lethal, not non lethal, and they’re frequently used as an excuse to escalate violence needlessly. I’m very critical of the use of their use of force and would generally prefer police to be unarmed, but this is not a situation where I have any complaints. That threat needed to be neutralized as quickly and effectively as possible. Overwhelming force was the best way to do that.

        • @ABCDE
          link
          12 months ago

          Was overwhelming force used? It sounded like one person going up a ladder and retreating, before the guy got shot(s) away.