Progressive Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) announced Wednesday that there are currently enough votes in the Senate to suspend the filibuster to codify Roe v. Wade and abortion rights if Democrats win control of the House and keep the Senate and White House.

“We will suspend the filibuster. We have the votes for that on Roe v. Wade,” Warren said on ABC’s “The View.”

She said if Democrats control the White House and both chambers of Congress in 2025, “the first vote Democrats will take in the Senate, the first substantive vote, will be to make Roe v. Wade law of the land again in America.”

  • @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15 months ago

    No? Why would it be. You don’t need a filibuster proof margin to eliminate the filibuster. If your point had been “a filibuster proof majority is so incredibly rare it makes governing essentially impossible” that would be relevant, but just pointing out we only had one once so that’s why Roe wasn’t codified is not.

    • Baron Von J
      link
      115 months ago

      Senator Warren’s comments, and this post about them, aren’t just about the filibuster. It’s also about codifying Roe v Wade. And I was replying to someone who said they should have done something about when they could have. The only times they could have are when they either suspended the filibuster or when they had a filibuster-proof majority. And my reply related to the last time the Democratic party could have reasonably done anything about Roe v Wade, which just so happens to have been the last time the only time they had a filibuster-proof majority.

      I don’t know why you’re gatekeeping so hard here. The votes on my comments indicate everyone else thinks I’m making positive contributions to the discussion. So maybe just relax a little and let people converse on the topic.

        • Baron Von J
          link
          55 months ago

          my point with that was simply that you seem to be the only one who thinks I’m offtopic.

    • @BassTurd
      link
      25 months ago

      We didn’t have the votes to get it done in 2020 as the person you responded to pointed out. No, we didn’t need a filibuster proof majority, but we needed a voting majority to suspend the filibuster, which we didn’t have with Sinema and Manchin. Outside of Obama and the ACA, there hasn’t been an opportunity to get anything through both chambers that didn’t have Republican support.

      So it is a valid excuse for why it’s not been codified without a filibuster proof majority.

      • @Ensign_Crab
        link
        English
        35 months ago

        When we have the seats, we find the no votes.

        • Baron Von J
          link
          65 months ago

          But they only had at most 48 and the VP because Manchin and Sinema torpedoed the discussion before it could be put to vote.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            45 months ago

            I am speaking as a general statement on the requirements, not rehashing what happened with those two turds in the past.

          • @Ensign_Crab
            link
            English
            15 months ago

            And which party did they belong to?

            • Baron Von J
              link
              45 months ago

              At the time in 2021? … they were both members of the Democratic party. Sinema registered as Independent in 2022 and Manchin only did so at the end of May this year.

              • @Ensign_Crab
                link
                English
                15 months ago

                Correct. They were Democrats, and they were acting like Democrats.