• @RapidcreekOP
    link
    253 months ago

    Then someone would complain that I changed the title, which is against the rules. There’s a picture of him, and the summary has his name.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      483 months ago

      Just a note that Rule 1 in the sidebar says “if your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive”, so changing it is ok as long as it improves the information as the OP suggested. We’re luckily not constrained by the terrible titles chosen by news sites to boost clicks.

      • @zerog_bandit
        link
        63 months ago

        They’re still running on Reddit rules

        • Rhaedas
          link
          fedilink
          113 months ago

          Which were terrible. My favorite was when a source capitalized the title, so anything you did would violate a rule and get it removed.

          • Ninmi
            link
            fedilink
            33 months ago

            I assume as the volume of links grow, the amount of work mods would have to do in vetting editorialized headlines grow as well as some people would like to inject in their own bias. You’d see this obnoxious editorialization from time to time in .ml in the past on articles concerning USA, for example.

            I’d just add the relevant info in angle brackets after the original headline, personally.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      73 months ago

      And then the actual title of the article will be changed 2 hrs later by the actual news agency.

    • Corroded
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 months ago

      I haven’t seen a lot of people get upset about altered titles on Lemmy. I feel like there’s a general understanding that an accurate title is better.

      Some people cite the article’s original headline in the text below the submitted link.