• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    613 months ago

    Honestly, I’d settle for a good one. Gay or not. Because a person’s sexuality and preferences are entirely irrelevant to one’s ability to be a fair and hard working representative.

    • @lmaydev
      link
      283 months ago

      Let’s not pretend that people would refuse to vote for a gay candidate.

      Whether we personally consider it an issue it has likely massively hurt their prospects as a politician.

      Also representation is really important. Especially for younger people.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        13 months ago

        I’ve never in my life voted for someone because they were a heterosexual. I vote based on their track record. When we stop giving a shit about what people do with their genitals, we will be better off. We don’t need gender identity representation in our politics- we just need someone that will treat all people as equals- and enact policy that reflects this.

        • @lmaydev
          link
          12
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Again you might not but plenty of people would. I would say it’s a pretty large crowd as well.

          Also sexuality has nothing to do with gender.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            23 months ago

            We’re not talking about gender, we’re talking about homosexuality. That has everything to do with genital preference.

            • @lmaydev
              link
              13 months ago

              They said gender identity.

        • @HomerianSymphony
          link
          -43 months ago

          When we stop giving a shit about what people do with their genitals, we will be better off.

          (From the people who brought you “JD Vance fucks couches”.)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            4
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Unless he himself has been saying that, you’re painting with too broad a brush. We aren’t all accountable for what our political allies do. Thank fuck. There are plenty of people on the left with more enthusiasm than ability to reason and communicate in public.

            And I say that appreciating the irony that I will hold republicans accountable for allowing Nazis in their midst. But the difference to me is they don’t speak out. Some of us will call out the left on bullshit (e.g. Gaza) even if we share similar ultimate goals. I see very few on the right ever do that.

            Also, Vance fucks furniture is sort of obvious humor that no one takes really seriously, anyway, so probably not worth tackling that as a serious subject.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -53 months ago

          When we stop giving a shit about what people do with their genitals,

          This is not how international politics work. Can you think for a second of the optics on the world stage? The us isn’t some international flyover state equivalent like Iceland. If Harris steps down and Buttigeg needs to meet with someone in the Middle East how do you think that meeting is going to go over? The US is a big fish and this is like, unprecedented for a world power this huge.

            • JayTreeman
              link
              fedilink
              93 months ago

              Exactly. It would be an incredible way to push forward lgbt+ rights. I’d prefer a candidate with good politics, but I’d be lying if I didn’t like the idea of how it would ruffle bigots… But Harris’s main goal is to get elected.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -23 months ago

              Ok, fine I’ll give you that totally unlikely outcome. Pete then follows up with the question: Your nation executes homosexuals but decided to let me live, are you going to reconsider your policy on executing them?

              How do you think that response will blow over? This is an unstable region with extreme hatred towards anything lgtbq. Very unlikely they’d even invite him to discuss any oil deals.

              • @Burn_The_Right
                link
                23 months ago

                Ooh! Is it Fantastic Fiction Story Time?! Ok, my turn!

                Then, President Buttigieg produces flowers from thin air with a “Tah-Dah!”, handing them to the foreign leader. The leader then embraces the president and everyone cheers!

                Fiction is fun!

      • @HomerianSymphony
        link
        -7
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        it has likely massively hurt their prospects as a politician

        Or, the complete opposite.

        Do you think there’s any way Pete, the mayor of a town of 100,000 people, would have become a national presidential candidate if he wasn’t gay?

        • @MegaUltraChicken
          link
          33 months ago

          Absolutely. Hes one of the best communicators in the party. Dude is a fantastic surrogate. Especially when you send him into unfriendly territory. I’m not going to say he’s the right pick for VP (I have some problems with his policy background), but acting like he’s only where he is because of his sexuality is fucking stupid.

    • @foggy
      link
      183 months ago

      …that’s kinda what he’s saying. He’s saying there’s enough people who agree with this now that the political backlash to it will be a drop of hate in a huge bucket of sensible sentiments.

    • @Agent641
      link
      113 months ago

      Is america ready for a competent president? Will voters accept an adequate candidate? Its hard to say, without knowing first which divisive and inflammatory categories they can be sorted into.