I understand that weather on TV can’t be hyperlocally accurate. But a weather app on my phone has my exact GPS coordinates. Why can’t it tell me exactly when a rain cloud will be passing over my location?

It’s gotten to the point where I just use precipitation maps to figure out my rain chances for the day.

The hourly forecast is mostly useless because it’s not a chance % but a % of the area that will be raining.

  • @givesomefucks
    link
    English
    131 month ago

    But a weather app on my phone has my exact GPS coordinates. Why can’t it tell me exactly when a rain cloud will be passing over my location?

    Because they’ve never been able to do that…

    When they say “50% chance of rain”, it doesn’t meant there’s a 50/50 chance it rains where you’re located

    It’s that for the broadcast area, about half is gonna get rain.

    • @folekaule
      link
      191 month ago

      Unless I misunderstood what you said, that’s not it either. 50% chance of rain means exactly that: according to their forecast models, there is a 50% change it will rain. Snopes did a writeup of this.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        13
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Key word “in the given forecast area”.

        The statement “there’s a 40% chance of rain at any given point at any given time in the forecast area/period” is an average over both area and time.

        Many different actual distributions of rain could result in that average, including a 100% chance of it raining 100% of the time in 40% of the are or a 40% chance of it raining in 100% of the time in 100% of the area, and a 100% chance of it raining 40% of the time in 100% of the area. Real distributions are typically messier than that.

          • @kitnaht
            link
            -16
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Reading Snopes will give you plenty. Read the articles - and a lot of them use weasel-wording to push the result they want.

            I don’t have the exact article on hand at the moment, but an example would be someone claiming that clear-cutting 1000 acres of trees would destroy [X]^3 of CO2 reduction; and then Snopes will “fact check” it by saying they aren’t cutting down 1000 acres of trees this year. Often times they’ll ‘debunk’ something that sounds like the claim, but isn’t the actual claim.

            • AmidFuror
              link
              fedilink
              81 month ago

              That’s not a correct understanding of how Snopes works. They debunked this.

              • @kitnaht
                link
                -31 month ago

                We’ve investigated ourselves, and have found nothing wrong!

                • @TheTetrapod
                  link
                  31 month ago

                  I think you just restated their joke.

        • @linearchaos
          link
          English
          61 month ago

          yeah, never mind the references in the article where they pointed out the evidence for their conclusions. :P

    • Pasta Dental
      link
      fedilink
      61 month ago

      It’s that for the broadcast area, about half is gonna get rain.

      Isn’t that virtually the same thing as a 50% chance of rain at my position though?

      • @givesomefucks
        link
        English
        11 month ago

        Yeah…

        And it wants a definitive answer for the exact location they’re standing in…

        Which isn’t possible

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -11 month ago

        No, because clouds—and weather patterns in general—are not necessarily uniform across an area.

      • Rhynoplaz
        link
        -21 month ago

        Yeah, kind of. It’s going to rain. That’s the forecast. That rain will effect half of the area in their forecast range.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 month ago

      No it doesn’t, it means that under those conditions, about 50% of the times it has rained in that area