@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 month agoRulefiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square123fedilinkarrow-up11.13Karrow-down13
arrow-up11.12Karrow-down1imageRulefiles.catbox.moe@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 month agomessage-square123fedilink
minus-square@alekwithaklink20•edit-21 month agoWell it’s certainly not proof per se*, but considering all the bugs and spies the USSR planted it seems like a no brainer that they would be listening in on any and all unencrypted over the air communications.
minus-squareFaridlinkfedilink15•1 month agoJust FYI, the phrase is “per se”, not “per say”. It’s Latin for “by itself”.
minus-square@alekwithaklink7•1 month agoJust FYI, Not according to my android keyboard’s autocorrect.
minus-squareFaridlinkfedilink4•1 month agoMaybe it has learned from previous occasions. Mine doesn’t suggest either option.
Well it’s certainly not proof per se*, but considering all the bugs and spies the USSR planted it seems like a no brainer that they would be listening in on any and all unencrypted over the air communications.
Just FYI, the phrase is “per se”, not “per say”. It’s Latin for “by itself”.
Just FYI, Not according to my android keyboard’s autocorrect.
Maybe it has learned from previous occasions. Mine doesn’t suggest either option.