Bottom Line

The only purported evidence for the claim that Khelif is trans comes from an undisclosed test performed by an allegedly corrupt sports governing body that may have shown she has a DSD condition. The IOC has said Khelif meets its requirements for participation, with Adams, the IOC spokesman, specifically clarifying, “This is not a transgender issue.”

Because Khelif is not transgender, claims attempting to make her victory against Carini an issue about transgender rights or “woke” politics are without basis.

  • @UncleArthur
    link
    -1253 months ago

    No-one is saying she’s trans. She is, however, chromosomally male (DSD), which is the issue under debate.

    • m-p{3}
      link
      fedilink
      733 months ago

      There are genetic conditions, termed differences of sexual development, in which biological females are born with XY chromosomes but possess female anatomy

      Though there is no independent confirmation that Khelif has these conditions, people born this way would legally be considered female or intersex.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            03 months ago

            Some people don’t care, some are too stupid to even grasp the concept.

            The person you’re replying to obviously cares enough to comment…

        • m-p{3}
          link
          fedilink
          353 months ago

          And as I said, it hasn’t been independently confirmed, pure speculation until then.

          • @NatakuNox
            link
            183 months ago

            And the Olympics don’t make chromosomes the deciding factor for competition. So even if her chromosomes aren’t “correct” these people just want to make her the poster child of women abuse… These same people want to ban women’s right to medically care so it’s all anti women and anti LGBTQ all wrapped up in one.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          183 months ago

          Swyer syndrome is just males born with vaginas and occasionally getting pregnant and giving birth I guess.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          103 months ago

          That’s what I was taught in primary school. But it turns out a lot of things are more complex than what was taught in primary school.

    • Unruffled [he/him]OPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      623 months ago

      You mustn’t have read the article. There is zero proof of that, just a half-baked claim with no proof to back it up, from the corrupt and sanctioned International Boxing Association (IBA). Women really shouldn’t have to their genitals or chromosomes inspected just to prove they are a ‘real’ woman, just because some arsehole thinks they don’t look feminine enough.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -58
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        So:

        • iba is wrong and corrupt,

        • the tests were fake and even if they weren’t they shouldn’t even be done

        • everyone who thinks she looks very atypical for a woman and very typical for a man is wrong

        • if anyone doesn’t agree with you, they are an “arshole”

        Brilliant! Bravo!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          313 months ago

          Unironically, yes, that is a decent summary of the situation. I mean your last bullet wasn’t in the article and is somewhat subjective, but…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -333 months ago

            Ok. Wow. You really don’t see how you look like, claiming this?

            I mean if nothing else, you look like the “arshole” in the situation .

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              173 months ago

              So, the test administered by the IBA was “We can’t tell you, it’s proprietary” and the results of the test were “Trust me bro, she failed,” and now this supposed test result is being used by people to jump to conclusions about her appearance and to try and drag her down just to make a rallying point in arguments about sex and gender in sports. Sorry if people blatantly ignoring how flimsy their evidence is so they can make a point by accusing some athlete of being really a male led me to make my own uncouth assumptions about the personality of someone who would hold such a view.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -14
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                So you had no thought about iba not releasing the full tests to protect the athlete?

                You are jumping to conclusion that it’s all a big conspiracy against this athlete. That sounds unlikely to me.

                Also, you accuse me of using this situation as some kind of rallying cry and I will assume everyone that is not 100% in line with what you think. I was banned from another community just by saying that there is an issue in woman sports by individuals with certain conditions and that it should be addressed. Who is in total mob mode here? Not even a mention of discussion is allowed.

                • @acosmichippo
                  link
                  English
                  9
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  So you had no thought about iba not releasing the full tests to protect the athlete?

                  You are jumping to conclusion that it’s all a big conspiracy against this athlete. That sounds unlikely to me.

                  Are you aware of the circumstances around the decision, the IBA being banned for having a long history of shadiness, and only failing this woman as soon as she beat a Russian? I suppose the IOC could all be conspiracy theorists too…

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              103 months ago

              …says the person downvoted to ovlivion for being an arsehole.

              Some people… How can you be so… unaware.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  63 months ago

                  Whether you’re an asshole or not absolutely depends on the opinion of others, not your own.

                  Again… Fucking unaware of your surroundings.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -93 months ago

                    You must be very thick to think I would notice being banned, down votes, insults and all kind of vomit only for mentioning that this is an issue in women’s sports.

                    Very very thick. I would use a harsher word, but I’d immediately banned. Unlike some.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          183 months ago
          1. Correct, with proof.
          2. Correct, see bullet point 1.
          3. There’s nothing that describes a “typical woman” or “typical man”.
          4. Correct, I think the actual term is a “bigot”.
        • @Username02
          link
          163 months ago

          Do you get off from being stupid?

        • Unruffled [he/him]OPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Pretty good summary TBH.

          The last point is also supported by the evidence at hand.

    • @Bassman1805
      link
      583 months ago

      Not even. The IBA never clarified what test she supposedly failed, they just randomly disqualified her and never explained why.

      And yes, TONS of people are claiming she’s trans.

        • @MotoAsh
          link
          173 months ago

          Well, the world is full of idiots, so sadly stupid things like this become real issues that hurt real people.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -123 months ago

              That’s a very obviously not true. Most people don’t know what is going on and they go by what they read in the news or were told. If you start by calling them idiots, they will (quite legitimately I must add) think you are the idiot and ignore you.

      • @UncleArthur
        link
        -243 months ago

        I don’t count Trump as a person.

        • barooboodoo (he/him)
          link
          fedilink
          123 months ago

          We’re all really impressed with your super clever and funny joke but maybe you should go back and edit the blatant lie out of your original comment now?

    • themeatbridge
      link
      353 months ago

      What’s your basis for making the claim about her chromosomes?

        • Plum
          link
          403 months ago

          Quillette?

          Never heard of it.

          It has been described as libertarian-leaning,[2][3][4] “the right wing’s highly influential answer to Slate”[5] as well as an “anti-PC soapbox.”[6]

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -293 months ago

            That doesn’t make it wrong in this specific case or even necessarily less trustworthy in the general case. The Wall Street Journal is generally considered a conservative-leaning newspaper but their reporting is very reliable.

            • Plum
              link
              233 months ago

              We’re at a point where vetting news corps is an important step in wading through disinformation and vitriol.

            • @Eldritch
              link
              English
              193 months ago

              Reliably conservative? Sure. Reliably factual. Eeeeeeh, that’s stretching a bit.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -8
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                I think that not trusting the news in the WSJ is a good indicator of being in a partisan bubble.

                • @Eldritch
                  link
                  English
                  143 months ago

                  Trusting it is just as much being in a partisan bubble. I don’t trust any of them honestly. Any corporately owned media I automatically have a bias against. And that’s not a bad thing. Because I know what their bottom line is and I know what’s important to them.

                  That does not mean that they cannot have a good reporters and reporting. That happens much less often. Far less often than it used to even. But you only trust reporters. And those who have earned it. The outlets that they belong to are superficial.

                  Rupert media is using the outfits former credibility to launder batshit opinion and twisted facts to push an agenda as much as any place else these days. Even if I tend to agree with things they publish that I see. You never trust a capitalist. Well to do anything other than enrich themselves that is.

        • themeatbridge
          link
          17
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          The IBA says this was not a testosterone test, which means it’s referring to a genetic test.

          At no point has the IBA said it was a genetic test, nor has it shared the results of any test.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -12
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          The Snopes article conflates the unfounded claims that these athletes are transgender with the more serious claims that their testosterone levels are outside the standard female range, and then dismisses the latter based on evidence against the former. Your article does a much better job at distinguishing these claims and addresses each one thoughtfully and in detail.

          The sort of zero-information Twitter posters making this a “woke” issue one way or the other should be ignored. With that said, I think its valid to criticize the IOC for the lack of standards and testing which would exclude athletes with masculine levels of testosterone from women’s competitions. I also think that the IBA’s accusations are currently unsupported by any publicly-available evidence; respect for the athletes’ medical privacy would justify this in a normal situation, but the IBA is both untrustworthy and motivated to cause specifically this sort of controversy.

          The athletes caught in the middle may actually be biologically typical women, in which case the entire controversy is moot. I wonder if they will volunteer to be tested by some reliable third party in order to settle this issue. They aren’t obligated to, but I admit that if they don’t then I will be suspicious about their motives.

          • @MotoAsh
            link
            153 months ago

            They already have been “tested” and passed.

            Interesting how you want to draw a hard line around something with extremely fuzzy borders, almost like you want to control the world instead of understand it…

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -9
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Are you saying that the IOC tested the testosterone levels of these athletes? That’s not something I have read anywhere else. Do you have a link?

              The hard line is between athletes who are allowed to compete in the women’s games and athletes who aren’t. There’s no possibility of fuzziness there.

              • @MotoAsh
                link
                53 months ago

                “… no possibility of fuzziness there.”

                … and yet you ask ME to provide the proof. Just move along bigot. At least if you value your life.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              24
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              You did say

              She is, however, chromosomally male (DSD)

              which I think is not a conclusion that can be confidently reached given the available evidence.

        • themeatbridge
          link
          163 months ago

          This is a summary of my take on the controversy surrounding Olympic boxing. If any facts are wrong, please help me correct them. Sorry for the long thread.

          And then that’s it. There’s no additional information.

      • barooboodoo (he/him)
        link
        fedilink
        223 months ago

        What the heck? Why would they do something like that? Banning a person for blatantly lying about a subject they know nothing about in the first place? That’s so weird!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -143 months ago
          • I never said a lie

          • I know te subject as much as anyone here

          The problem is that some subjects are tabu here and they should not even be mentioned, let alone discussed. Its ironic and quite idiotic considering what extreme views you can find on the same lemmy communities.

          • barooboodoo (he/him)
            link
            fedilink
            53 months ago
            • Yes, you did.

            • No, you don’t.

            Yeah it’s so taboo, look how little discussion is going on here. Although I guess it might seem like that when you ignore all the comments disproving your misinformation.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -73 months ago
              • nope

              • yes I most certainly do. But you on the other hand are way out of your depth

              What are you even taking about? Now you are just pulling stuff out of your dumb ass. Nobody is proving or disproving anything here. Just a lot of hysteria and insults.

              Pointless. I will leave you to your warm and cozy bubble where any challenge is met with vitriol and vomit. Bye.

              • barooboodoo (he/him)
                link
                fedilink
                13 months ago

                Cool thanks. Have fun continuing not to watch or support women’s combat sports and deciding you get to have terrible opinions about subjects you’re completely uninformed on!

      • @UncleArthur
        link
        -373 months ago

        It’s weird. I’m left-wing but am being accused of being right-wing because I believe men should not compete in women’s sports.

        Two hundred years ago, a woman was someone’s property. Now, apparently, it’s just a feeling, or something that is defined by a passport rather than chromosomes. Women are losing their rights to men who are taking over every aspect of their sex and it makes me angry.

        • @Eldritch
          link
          English
          423 months ago

          You’re being down voted because you’re asserting something maliciously as fact that there’s no actual evidence of.

        • @dexa_scantron
          link
          303 months ago

          No, instead someone’s gender should be determined by randos on the internet who believe lies spread by corrupt Russian boxing officials. As God intended. /s

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -183 months ago

            Or you should? Wtf are you taking about.

            Relax. Not everything you don’t like is a corrupt Russian trying to hurt your feelings.

            • Unruffled [he/him]OPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              113 months ago

              That’s the whole point. A person’s gender shouldn’t be up to you to decide, for @[email protected] to decide, or for some corrupt boxing organization located in a country known for it’s anti-lgbtq+ stance to decide.

              We can only go by the facts in this case. The only fact that matters here is that Imane Khelif says she is a woman. The IBA has produced no facts to the contrary, only unsubstantiated claims, and they are not a trustworthy source.

              Even if she does have some chromosomal difference, and we have no idea if that is true, that is not something that would matter in the Olympics, because it’s not against their rules. So, it’s really a moot point anyway.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -73 months ago

                But I’m not trying to decide it. I never had. I think she should be able to compete. She was competing before, the other competitors were not against it.

                What I’m saying is that women sports have this issue because conditions do arise in body development. I’m not saying imame has it (all though all the circumstantial evidence first point to it, but that’s beside the point).

                But whenever I mention this and I get attacked. There looks like there is no room for discussion here. It’s either a ban, or people start to rain on with person insults and strawmen. I find it really interesting. Usually in these situations there’s is a lot of room for people to grow. I’m trying to see if anyone will be able to calm down enough first.

        • @takeda
          link
          273 months ago

          You started a tirade against someone without any evidence available yet.

          IBA claimed that she was ineligible due to some unspecified test they did. Perhaps they will disclose tomorrow.

          Everything points out that this ban was political to protect a Russian boxer who lost to her. Khelif fought for many years she also lost 9 times to other women, but just that one time when she fought to Russian boxer she got disqualified by organization that itself got disqualified for corruption and ties with Kremlin.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -183 months ago

            Why start with some conspiracy theory? Why are some people so much against talking about this issue. I got banned just bringing it up. Everybody here thinks the best action is to ban all mention of the issue and pretend it doesn’t exist.

            • @Agrivar
              link
              153 months ago

              Why start with some conspiracy theory?

              Like that she’s not a woman? that conspiracy theory?

                • @acosmichippo
                  link
                  English
                  3
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  Then you surely agree that we should be questioning their integrity in this matter, right?

                  Also consider there have been no other transgender-related controversies around these olympics except for the two initiated by the IBA.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -33 months ago

                    The tests and results are confidential for a reason.

                    The whole idea of a conspiracy to affect one boxer in the woman’s category doesn’t make sense.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          203 months ago

          Why can’t you just own up to the fact that you hate this person for no rational reason?

          First she was trans and when that didn’t work it was hormones and when that didn’t work it was testosterone and when that didn’t work it was chromosomes and now that this isn’t working I’m genuinely curious what rabbit you’ll pull out of your hat this time.