Tagged as NSFW because this level of nonsense is a cognito hazard. Found through a retweet of a Xitter post of a Reddit post of Facebook discussion. If shares this, please keep the repost count up to date. Ty! 🙏

I’ve been wanting to create a community for this sort of “so wrong they’re right” shit from right wingers. It wouldn’t just be queer related, but about any instance of conservative logic accidentally pointing to the truth. It’d be stuff like this:

The only issue is that I dislike figuring simple tech stuff out, so I’ll never get around to doing it. It’s just a chore, even if it isn’t hard or I know how to do it. I pick my fights with ADHD, and creating a community to run isn’t a top priority 😞

  • @[email protected]
    55•1 month ago

    Ok so a trans woman transitions too well for their liking and thus they declare they must have been cis all along?

    Fucking Kek.

    • @[email protected]
      24•1 month ago

      btw please write “trans woman” instead of “transwoman”, I’m sure you didn’t intend it but the latter is frequently used by as a dog-whistle by fascists to avoid admitting we are women.

    • TheHarpyEagle
      10•1 month ago

      Their criteria is based entirely on whether the person in question gives them a boner. Someone beat it to Mulvaney and now has to convince themselves that she is a “real woman” to sleep at night.

      • @Etterra
        1•1 month ago

        People will do anything to evade cognitive dissonance and nobody ever like conservatives.