• @jordanlund
    link
    English
    356 months ago

    They must not be counting light rail which is electric.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_rail_in_the_United_States

    "The United States, with its 27 systems (as counted by the Light Rail Transit Association), has a much larger number of “true” light rail systems (not including streetcar systems), by far, compared to any other country in the world (the next largest are Germany with 10 and Japan with 9).[1]

    According to the American Public Transportation Association, of the roughly 30 cities with light rail systems in the United States, the light rail systems in six of them (Boston, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Portland (Oregon), San Diego, and San Francisco) achieve more than 30 million unlinked passenger transits per year.[2]"

    The problem with light rail here is excessive heat makes the overhead wire expand and when that happens, it sags causing the trains to have to slow down. :(

    In the winter, the problem is snow and ice blocking the lines and the switches.

    • Altima NEO
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      In Portland, the biggest problem light rail has are assholes parking on the tracks.

      • @jordanlund
        link
        English
        46 months ago

        Or driving in front of the train!

        • @Lost_My_Mind
          link
          English
          116 months ago

          Just hit the damn car. You’re a god damned TRAIN!!! CHOO CHOO MOTHERFUCKER!!!

          It’s like Paul Heyman told Taz. “If anybody gets in your way, get em’ outta your way!”

      • @Passerby6497
        link
        English
        46 months ago

        Sounds like the trains need a cow catcher to help clear the tracks.

      • @grue
        link
        English
        26 months ago

        Haha cowcatcher goes brrrrrrrrrrrr

      • Amanda
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 months ago

        Sounds like that should be assholes without cars

    • @reddig33
      link
      English
      -166 months ago

      You’d think with current battery tech we wouldn’t need the overhead wire anymore.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        466 months ago

        Batteries are heavy and expensive. A wired power source is so much more efficient for rail it’s barely worth discussing.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        136 months ago

        The best use of a battery on a train is a small one to handle junctions. You disconnect from the wire at the end of one set, go through the junction, and then reconnect at the other side. Saves a lot of ugly spaghetti wiring.

        Otherwise, no, just use wires.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          116 months ago

          You don’t even need that. Every electric train I know of has pickups on each car, and any break in the catenary or third rail is short enough that it can be bridged naturally by two cars, or sometimes even just one, if it has pickups at both ends.

      • Iron Lynx
        link
        English
        56 months ago

        That would mean that instead of an engine, you’re lugging around a battery pack, which is just as heavy while giving you a fraction of the range of an engine. Not to forget that battery cells have only a finite lifespan.

        Meanwhile, OHLE gives you infinite range and room for major weight savings. Plus you can keep running the same power system for decades.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26 months ago

        Battery and hydrogen-powered trains exist, they’re mainly used on less frequented lines because it would be more expensive to electrify them.