He’s had yet another horrible week. The old tricks aren’t working. Kamala Harris does not fear him. And it’s showing in the numbers.

  • @PM_Your_Nudes_Please
    link
    274 months ago

    Even then, the error % on polls is high enough that Trump could be ahead instead.

    Polls post their calculated error %. If they could be off by like 5% in either direction, then that’s what they say. And if the poll shows Trump losing by 2%, with a 5% error, that means Trump could win by 3%.

    Every single reputable poll that has been published shows a Trump victory within the margin of error.

    • @hate2bme
      link
      -124 months ago

      I don’t know a single person that has been polled. They are all guesswork.

      • @Bernie_Sandals
        link
        144 months ago

        No, they just don’t have to poll massive groups, surprisingly small groups work well enough for polling.

        • @hate2bme
          link
          -134 months ago

          Well they didn’t prove shit when they said Hillary was gonna win. Just gonna say I’m not ever gonna trust one.

          • @Bernie_Sandals
            link
            114 months ago

            Almost every poll had him winning within the margin of error, 2016 was never certain, just like this election isn’t.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            74 months ago

            Polls are all about probability. They can’t predict the future. So, even though Hillary was likely to win, there was still a chance that Trump could win. Does this mean that polls are useless? No, because knowing the popularity of your candidate relative to the other candidates is important information.

            • @CharlesDarwin
              link
              English
              14 months ago

              I doubt too many polls could have predicted the Comey/GOP/FBI election interference, for example.