You’re acting like it’s a useful point to be had. Everybody who already was a fucking 14 year old and isn’t ace already knows that. It’s not unless your trying to suggest it should follow a specific conclusion. 14 year olds can and do also want to drive, smoke, skip school, use explosives, and drink. Preferably all at the same time. Since your conclusion is transparent, well…
unless your trying to suggest it should follow a specific conclusion
That’s why we can’t have the discussion. Anyone trying to bring it up in any context gets accused of pedophilia. Even when there is a legitimate point to be made.
In this case iirc the point was about infantilizing women of all ages and the negative impacts of the madonna-whore complex and how pretending women have no sexual desire is actually quite misogynistic.
But yeah. Nope, forbidden topic. Insta ban. At least they didn’t make it permanent.
You didn’t make a point. You vaguely said that it’s taboo to say teenage girls have a sex drive (which hilariously, it isn’t: see the popular books, TV shows, and movies regarding that).
My ban disagrees. All the downvoters disagree. The guy so butthurt about something else I said that he decided to brigade me here on a totally unrelated topic disagrees.
I went from agreeing with the headline to fuck this guy real quick. I admittedly had never heard of Nothing, because it’s a stupid name, and so this decision is par for the course it seems. Just add another name to the Chop List.
Full transparency, I’m not arguing against full remote - I 100% support it. I’ve done it and it doesn’t work for me - I like being in the office a few days a week, but full onsite for desk jobs is asinine.
I’m in the office 2x/week, and it’s the perfect balance for us. We pack those two days w/ collaboration, which leaves the other three relatively open for individual work. And the best part about 2x/week is that you could theoretically fit twice the workers in the same physical space, which should reduce corporate leasing costs.
This is a litmus test for who actually reads the article
Since you’re being a scold elsewhere in the thread to everyone confused by the headline, I’ll just leave this here.
Wow.
That reason is pretty spot on.
Sir, my god.
oof
Oof, The ultimate “this you?”.
How do you find those mod reports?
https://slrpnk.net/modlog there’s the modlog on your instance.
Banned because I was absolutely correct, we are NOT ready for that discussion.
And it’s pathetic you go through the modlog looking for dirt on someone.
You’re acting like it’s a useful point to be had. Everybody who already was a fucking 14 year old and isn’t ace already knows that. It’s not unless your trying to suggest it should follow a specific conclusion. 14 year olds can and do also want to drive, smoke, skip school, use explosives, and drink. Preferably all at the same time. Since your conclusion is transparent, well…
That’s why we can’t have the discussion. Anyone trying to bring it up in any context gets accused of pedophilia. Even when there is a legitimate point to be made.
In this case iirc the point was about infantilizing women of all ages and the negative impacts of the madonna-whore complex and how pretending women have no sexual desire is actually quite misogynistic.
But yeah. Nope, forbidden topic. Insta ban. At least they didn’t make it permanent.
If you want to make a point that doesn’t make people fill in sentences for you, I’d recommend against being vague.
My point was that it’s impossible to make the point because people are hysterical.
I expected downvotes but did not anticipate the mods also being hysterical.
Ok so you made a point that people get hysterical when you start making suggestions that lead to pedophilia. What was the goal in that?
That’s the problem. You immediately jump to conclusions and then condemn people for shit you made up in your own mind.
You didn’t make a point. You vaguely said that it’s taboo to say teenage girls have a sex drive (which hilariously, it isn’t: see the popular books, TV shows, and movies regarding that).
My ban disagrees. All the downvoters disagree. The guy so butthurt about something else I said that he decided to brigade me here on a totally unrelated topic disagrees.
I went from agreeing with the headline to fuck this guy real quick. I admittedly had never heard of Nothing, because it’s a stupid name, and so this decision is par for the course it seems. Just add another name to the Chop List.
I did read it and my opinion stays the same.
To be in 5 days a week is nonsense.
A hybrid schedule would allow for the same collaboration and innovation. 3 days and office and 2 at home. Everyone wins.
sad machinist noises
You should get that fixed.
Few natural born enemies exist, fewer still as deep and natural as the animosity between machinery and maintenance.
I’m full remote…nothing says insulting like having to badge in then then call India to make sure the kids over there actually got some work done.
Full transparency, I’m not arguing against full remote - I 100% support it. I’ve done it and it doesn’t work for me - I like being in the office a few days a week, but full onsite for desk jobs is asinine.
I’m ok with hybrid for the people that need that, but mandating it means it’s probably not a company I want to work for.
Exactly.
I’m in the office 2x/week, and it’s the perfect balance for us. We pack those two days w/ collaboration, which leaves the other three relatively open for individual work. And the best part about 2x/week is that you could theoretically fit twice the workers in the same physical space, which should reduce corporate leasing costs.