CEO Carl Pei says remote work “is not compatible” with the company.

  • macniel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1184 months ago

    That headline is rather confusing. Then I realised that “Nothing” is a fricking company.

    Also branding his stuff as Nothing phone/OS/ear is hilarious. Hilariously bad.

    • originalucifer
      link
      fedilink
      304 months ago

      totally agree. this guy couldnt market his way out of a paper bag… like naming a social media server ‘moist’

    • subignition
      link
      fedilink
      144 months ago

      I think it’s a bit of a stroke of genius on the article author’s part, because it’s a great double entendre the way it’s written.

  • @SpaceNoodle
    link
    English
    1044 months ago

    ‘This is a company for grown ups’

    And yet you don’t trust your employees to get their work done unless directly before your watchful eye? Get real, chump.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      564 months ago

      “People can’t communicate as well remotely,” the CEO, projecting their personal lack of communication skills on everyone else.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    64
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    “I know this is a controversial decision that may not be a fit for everyone, and there are definitely companies out there that thrive in remote or hybrid setups,” he added. “But that’s not right for our type of business, and won’t help us fully realize our potential as a company.”

    By comparison, Nothing’s demand for five-day office attendance may sting for employees who helped shape the company while embracing its founding work-from-home environment.

    Besides calling people who want flexibility children, the company was founded as work from home even though that wasn’t right for the type of company. Sounds like the CEO doesn’t know how the company works.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    644 months ago

    Nothing CEO Carl Pei suggested that those unable to transition from remote working should leave the company and “find an environment where you thrive.”

    Get completely fucked you dismissive shitbag.

    Pei said in the email, telling employees who are worried about flexibility that “this is a company for grown ups.”

    I’ll say it again. Get completely…

    I typically cheer device makers because I want competition to force my preferred device maker to compete on innovation. I had been on the side of Nothing. I now want it to fail. I want this dickfaced asshole executive to find out he ran his company into the ground by pissing off the talented people below him.

    • @Feathercrown
      link
      English
      144 months ago

      Most likely his company will slowly crumble over the coming decades as his top talent leaves due to mistreatment while he wonders helplessly and obliviously how it all went wrong

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      64 months ago

      Seriously. I won’t buy Nothing-anything at this point over this move. Carl Pei can fuck right off.

      • @cm0002
        link
        English
        104 months ago

        I’ve seen that theory a lot, but I just don’t think it’s actually all that common. Layoffs are layoffs, but the common thing about layoffs is they are usually calculated to cut the worst performing employees and go up from there.

        A forced RTO policy is going to be unpredictable in who stays and who goes

        • @shalafi
          link
          English
          164 months ago

          Even worse, mandatory RTO selects for employees who have no choice but to stay. The talent will bail out.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 months ago

          also it guarantees that everyone starts using working hours to apply for jobs instead of doing their work.

        • Zagorath
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24 months ago

          The thing is, these decisions are made at a level that doesn’t much care for the distinction. Mid-level managers know who the good workers are, and in regular layoffs they’d be making decisions about who to lay off. But even before that happens, top-level executives have decided how many to lay off, and it’s not much of a concern to them who specifically goes.

          Same with RTO constructive layoffs. They estimate a certain percentage will quit, reducing their cost base. There’s not much more thought than that.

  • P03 Locke
    link
    fedilink
    English
    454 months ago

    “Nothing is requiring employees to be in the office five days a week”

    Yes, you’re right. There isn’t a thing that requires this. You shouldn’t be required to do so.

    The problem with naming a company an idiotic name like “Nothing” is that it’s so easy to make who’s-on-first jokes.

    • @huzzahunimpressively
      link
      English
      7
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      theres nothing i hate more than nothing nothing keeps me up at night i toss and turn over nothing nothing can cause a great big fight

      Yeah I was really confused when I read the title lol, I have to remember that there is a company named Nothing

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    294 months ago

    I’m assuming he made this declaration from his office, otherwise it would be hypocritical, and that’s impossible. Surely.

  • Diplomjodler
    link
    English
    244 months ago

    Not that it matters but that would make me incompatible with the company.

  • Seraph
    link
    fedilink
    244 months ago

    Projection. Guys like this are admitting that they themselves are incapable of the discipline required for at home work and think no one else can either.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    23
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I really liked the work Nothing was doing, what a bummer. “this is a company for grown ups” my ass, how condescending.

    • warm
      link
      fedilink
      234 months ago

      What work? They are just regular phones, with a bit more ego centric bs marketing showered over.

      • The Quuuuuill
        link
        fedilink
        English
        164 months ago

        Yeah their hardware was overpriced and I couldn’t find any justification for their prices being higher than “well but we’re independent and our hardware is aesthetically pleasing”

        Like… I get why Teracube and Fairphone are expensive for their specs. But Nothing gave me cryptobro vibes

        • macniel
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Fairphone are expensive for their specs

          ye, and its a price I gladly paid for my fairphone 5. I love that thing :D

          • The Quuuuuill
            link
            fedilink
            English
            34 months ago

            The thing is… Fair phone is how expensive all phones their capability should be. Its just that most phones are greed machines produced via the exploitation of labor

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        The design and interface mostly. Nothing UI is actually pleasurable to use, but I’m a fan of minimalism.

        • warm
          link
          fedilink
          64 months ago

          Fair, but isn’t it just pretty much just stock android? I guess it’s nice to have another option out there for (almost) stock though.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            24 months ago

            Stock android doesn’t really exist. It barely works and is missing essential features like working Bluetooth audio. It’s intended as a starting point for companies to build their own experience on top of, if any company released a phone running anywhere near stock android they would be laughed out of existence. Linus Tech tips did a pretty good overview of what stock android is a few days ago https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-hlRB2izres

            • warm
              link
              fedilink
              24 months ago

              Sure, but that’s not really what people mean when they talk about “stock android”. Generally it means a version you would find on a Pixel or Xperia phone, the bare minimum basically without complete overhauls like OneUI etc.

              But you already knew that.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                14 months ago

                That version doesn’t exist is what I’m saying. The manufacturers have to put in significant work to get it to that point. And along the way they have to choose to make it similar to pixel/what people expect “stock” android to look like, instead of putting their own flair on it. My point is that it takes just as much work to make an android skin that feels “stock” as to make one that doesn’t. You can’t dismiss their version of Android as being “stock” because that doesn’t exist.

    • Lemminary
      link
      English
      7
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It’s a requirement at this point. Evil is the only way up, or so they tell themselves.

  • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
    link
    English
    174 months ago

    “Remote work is not compatible with a high ambition level plus high speed,”

    Because wasting time shipping squishy sacks of flesh through meatspace to push buttons is so much faster than having them push buttons at home. /s

    But if you have as shitty a company name as “Nothing” then I guess you need all the ambition you can get.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    174 months ago

    This right here. This article title. This is why you don’t name your company “Nothing”.

    • @Red_October
      link
      English
      64 months ago

      And when I saw it I had initially thought “Wouldn’t it be funny if someone named their company Nothing and was struggling to push a return to office?”

  • @Snapz
    link
    English
    174 months ago

    Why would we listen to this fucking tool? He’s literally the CEO of nothing.

  • @hdnsmbt
    link
    English
    16
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Pei said in the email, telling employees who are worried about flexibility that “this is a company for grown ups.”

    During the next pandemic, do employees get to refuse working from home on the grounds of being grown ups?

      • @hdnsmbt
        link
        English
        44 months ago

        I wouldn’t want to that. I’m calling for a strike ✊