@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 4 months agoI shall exercise against you my right of rejection because you have treated me with contempt.mander.xyzimagemessage-square20fedilinkarrow-up1347arrow-down18
arrow-up1339arrow-down1imageI shall exercise against you my right of rejection because you have treated me with contempt.mander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 4 months agomessage-square20fedilink
minus-squareKerblinkfedilinkEnglish59•4 months agocuneiform isnt even that weird, check out the multiocular O ꙮ this was only used once in a single cyrillic manuscript to spell “many-eyed seraphim”
minus-squareCyrus DraegurlinkfedilinkEnglish17•4 months ago> Furries in the audience respond: "OwO neat sona~! OK BE AT LEAST A LITTLE AFRAID
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish10•4 months agoAaahhhhh! I said be not afraid! Geez!
minus-squarerockerface 🇺🇦linkfedilinkEnglish9•4 months agoAnd the version of it most apps use doesn’t even have enough eyes. The original text (and the updated since Unicode) has 10-eyed O, while most places display 7. Old Cyrillic texts are pretty wild.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•4 months agoIt’s kind of infuriating that with trouble having been taken defining this single use character, people don’t bother to render it correctly.
cuneiform isnt even that weird,
check out the multiocular O ꙮ
this was only used once in a single cyrillic manuscript to spell “many-eyed seraphim”
Be not afraid.
> Furries in the audience respond: "OwO neat sona~!
OK BE AT LEAST A LITTLE AFRAID
ꙮWꙮ
What’s this‽
Their fly-sona.
Aaahhhhh!
I said be not afraid! Geez!
And the version of it most apps use doesn’t even have enough eyes. The original text (and the updated since Unicode) has 10-eyed O, while most places display 7. Old Cyrillic texts are pretty wild.
It’s kind of infuriating that with trouble having been taken defining this single use character, people don’t bother to render it correctly.