• Kerb
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7221 days ago

    shakes fist in anger 𒂍𒀀𒈾𒍢𒅕

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7821 days ago

      I’m flipping between “why is there cuneiform Unicode” and “of course there’s cuneiform Unicode” much more rapidly than I really expected

      • Kerb
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5921 days ago

        cuneiform isnt even that weird,
        check out the multiocular O ꙮ
        this was only used once in a single cyrillic manuscript to spell “many-eyed seraphim”

        • rockerface 🇺🇦
          link
          fedilink
          English
          921 days ago

          And the version of it most apps use doesn’t even have enough eyes. The original text (and the updated since Unicode) has 10-eyed O, while most places display 7. Old Cyrillic texts are pretty wild.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            621 days ago

            It’s kind of infuriating that with trouble having been taken defining this single use character, people don’t bother to render it correctly.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          Shame I can only see squares there. I wonder why. I can see wikipedia’s. Does this work? Two hieroglyphs: 𓂀𓀀

          Edit: It does, I can read those in my own comment.

          Edit 2: Windows issue? I can see them on Android/sync for lemmy.

          • Miles O'Brien
            link
            fedilink
            English
            821 days ago

            I can see both your and the original hieroglyphics just fine on my phone using Firefox, and on windows with the same.

            Odd thing is, my wife sometimes gets MY emoji and non-standard text as squares, and we have the exact same phone. The only difference between us is she uses the default keyboard.

      • @reinei
        link
        English
        620 days ago

        For anyone else stumbling about this revelation: It very well wouldn’t be Unicode otherwise now, would it?

        There’s a reason linguists and computer scientists sometimes get mental breakdowns over emoji because the know that those same emoji were on the same agenda taking up actual time as discussions about which ancient language or newly discovered grapheme/symbol/lexicogram/whatever should be added first/next. (Not saying emoji aren’t also tremendously important/good/what ever additions!!)

  • Iron Lynx
    link
    English
    1820 days ago

    I was not expecting a reference to Ea-nāsir…

  • @Tudsamfa
    link
    English
    4
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    Me and my 4 tribesmen making meters of twine by funnelling fibers through a mamoth femur: “Isn’t technology amazing?”

    1500 years later in Mesopotamia: “Your feedback is highly appreciated, please listen to our lyremen as you wait in line”