• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    23 months ago

    Why not just invest in battery tech? I get that there’s shortcomings atm for power density, but if we’re talking about cutting edge research (what I assume you mean by “I hope the can figure out methenol synthesis”), I’d personally prefer to be investing time and money into battery tech.

    • @ericjmorey
      link
      English
      13 months ago

      Because the battery tech you’re thinking about isn’t the most efficient in all cases. Using hydrocarbons as a battery can be more efficient depending on circumstances.

      • @Cort
        link
        53 months ago

        That’s a fairly extraordinary claim, do you have any sources on hydrocarbon creation being more efficient for round trip electrical storage than batteries?

        • @ericjmorey
          link
          English
          13 months ago

          Terraform is making the claim right now. By eliminating inverters and loss from long distance transmission lines there are opportunities to make solar installation that’s not near existing infrastructure to be economically more viable.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        33 months ago

        Which circumstances?

        Using electricity to create fuels purely for storage is a dead concept AFAIK. eFuels in the medium term will likely only be used where batteries cannot in their current form, e.g. aircraft or shipping. The energy and money cost needed to synthesise on-site with current tech is too high.

        • @ericjmorey
          link
          English
          13 months ago

          Aircraft and shipping would be two very important circumstances.

            • @ericjmorey
              link
              English
              13 months ago

              How is it not? Energy storage for use later in a different location from where it was collected seems like the purpose of a battery to me.