A U.S. Navy chief who wanted the internet so she and other enlisted officers could scroll social media, check sports scores and watch movies while deployed had an unauthorized Starlink satellite dish installed on a warship and lied to her commanding officer to keep it secret, according to investigators.

Internet access is restricted while a ship is underway to maintain bandwidth for military operations and to protect against cybersecurity threats.

The Navy quietly relieved Grisel Marrero, a command senior chief of the littoral combat ship USS Manchester, in August or September 2023, and released information on parts of the investigation this week.

  • @espentan
    link
    English
    332 months ago

    I’d be curious to see the dish install. It’s hard to imagine how someone would think it’d go unnoticed, on a warship, no less.

      • @someguy3
        link
        English
        292 months ago

        Ship officers heard the scuttlebutt about STINKY, of course, and they began asking questions and doing inspections, but they never found the concealed device. On August 18, though, a civilian worker from the Naval Information Warfare Center was installing an authorized SpaceX “Starshield” device and came across the unauthorized SpaceX device hidden on the weatherdeck.

        Heh.

        • teft
          link
          English
          242 months ago

          Why the F were they broadcasting the SSID on a “secret” wifi network? That’s just asking to get caught. If they had hidden the SSID most people would never have known about it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            372 months ago

            You’re expecting intelligence and competence from these people? The ones who thought it would be a good idea to violate a half dozen regulations to even install it in the first place?

            • Subverb
              link
              English
              62 months ago

              Supposedly she was an information and IT specialist… Setting the thing up to not broadcast its SSID should have been one of the first things they thought of. But probably she didn’t know it could be done, which again speaks to her overall incompetence.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            262 months ago

            Extra fun is that the head chief never gave anyone else the password. She logged into each of the other chiefs devices.

            She could have 100% also typed in the ssid at the time. It would have taken almost no extra effort.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              212 months ago

              You can view WiFi passwords for saved networks on pretty much every OS. There’s no reason to be secretive about entering WiFi passwords, at least to the people whose devices you’re entering the password on.

              • @ABCDE
                link
                English
                62 months ago

                Indeed, I can share it from my phone via QR or just see the password plain.

                • @foggenbooty
                  link
                  English
                  52 months ago

                  You think someone stupid enough to make all the above mistakes would be savvy enough to build PKI and a RADIUS server? You’re giving her too much credit.

          • @someguy3
            link
            English
            52 months ago

            The worker still would have found it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 months ago

            You can still see a WiFi network (and tell that it is unique from others) even when it’s not broadcasting SSID. It’s just one less piece of information available when someone is trying to access it.

            Security through obscurity isn’t security, but it’ll keep neighborhood kids from trying to guess the password from across the street. On a warship? They’d have still seen it.

            • @Wispy2891
              link
              English
              102 months ago

              Yes but not as blatant as STINKY

              Everyone with a smartphone would see STINKY and immediately get suspicious, while only techs would have noticed the hidden network and investigated on that

            • @kalleboo
              link
              English
              3
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              On a warship? They’d have still seen it.

              It took 6 months to discover, and even then it was by techs who went to physically install different hardware saw the dish hardware mounted to the ship. That’s the real WTF here, how do these ships not have some kind of passive RF scanning/rogue AP detection??

              It was seen by regular enlisted people who saw the network on their phones and left comment sheets asking WTF it was, but the person in question snatched up the papers before they got to the officers. If they had hidden the SSID, nobody would have seen it because nobody scans for hidden SSIDs on their phones.

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
          link
          English
          42 months ago

          scuttlebutt

          Do US Navy ships even have a scuttlebutt anymore?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            62 months ago

            Yes, they all have drinking fountains. Absolutely no one at all calls them scuttlebutts though.

            • @JustAnotherKay
              link
              English
              52 months ago

              Scuttlebutt in this case refers to gossip, which is also why the water fountains are called scuttlebutt - people would gossip around them

              • teft
                link
                English
                9
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Other way round. Scuttlebutt was the name for the casks of freshwater and then for the fountain. Sometime between those two eras it came to be the word for gossip because of the association with gossip being told around the scuttlebutt.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                32 months ago

                The commentator asked if ships had “a scuttlebutt” anymore. Im well aware it’s the term for gossip, but since gossip isn’t an object, I assumed they asking about the drinking fountains.

                Ships do still have them.

                • @JustAnotherKay
                  link
                  English
                  12 months ago

                  Oh I’m not trying to correct you I just have less than 0 social awareness and saw a word with a funny history so I shared my knowledge on it lol

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    22 months ago

                    No problem mate. Text can be a bit opaque at times, but it’s still a joy to be able to talk to so many people about so many things.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        162 months ago

        Ugh, Elon continues to have the absolute most inane sense of humor on the planet. I’m not sure if it’s him or Zuck who are more clearly aliens wearing human skin

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          92 months ago

          It’s Zuck. Elon is just a perpetual 13yo. TBH, he’s not entirely unlike Peter Pan (from the book).

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 months ago

            To be fair, I also try to be closer to 13yo than my actual age, I think that makes life more fun. But I’m also not the CEO of multiple large organizations, and I would adjust how I behave if I was in that role.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 months ago

        I tough they changed the name to stinky for the lulz but it was the default name imposed by the childbrain. Amazing opsec.

    • snooggums
      link
      English
      212 months ago

      Multiple people were involved, and it was probably mounted in a location where other people were unlikely to know that it was out of place.

    • Admiral Patrick
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yeah, same. It’s not like there were windows they could point it out of, so it would have to be exposed and somehow disguised.

      Lol, in college, some guy on my floor wasn’t happy with the dorm’s cable TV because it didn’t have NFL Sunday Ticket and brought his DirecTV dish/receiver from home. His room was facing the right way, so he was able to set the dish up in the room next to the window. This sortof reminds me of that but without the national security implications.