• @Maalus
    link
    -213 months ago

    A lot of people that aren’t doomers.

    • atro_city
      link
      fedilink
      223 months ago

      I don’t own a house with fortified bunker and a literal ton of food. Can’t buy a house to begin with. Being a doomer is for the rich.

      • @Maalus
        link
        -73 months ago

        Why do you need a house, a bunker? Being a doomer is being pessimistic about global problems, not prepping for the apocalypse.

        • atro_city
          link
          fedilink
          213 months ago

          Ah, indeed. I was mixing up doomer with prepper. Regardless, you don’t have to be a doomer to think the world is shit. You can be hopeful that things will change, but not want to submit an innocent person on pure hope that things will improve.

          • @Maalus
            link
            -123 months ago

            The “innocent person on pure hope that things will improve” is 100% doomerism.

            I live in a box of 6 flats. 4 of the people have kids, the other guy is renting to have a place to come back to when they return from working abroad. All of the flats at 40m2, people earning a fraction of a salary people in the US do, when the cost of living is maybe 80% of the US. Yet nobody is starving, the kids have a great life, parents are happy. Life goes on as it always has, with couples marrying, having kids, growing old together. This isn’t something that’s somehow unique to here, happens everywhere.

            If you want kids, you can get them, support them and give them a bright future. If you don’t want them, fine, just don’t say you can’t have children because the world sucks.

    • @stoly
      link
      23 months ago

      lol ok. You’re looking at everything and then arguing that the people who notice things are bad.